Spatial Transferability of Person-Level Daily Activity Generation and Time Use Models

An empirical assessment is made of the spatial transferability of person-level daily activity generation and time use models in regions in Florida and between Florida and California. The empirical models are for unemployed adults and are based on the multiple discrete-continuous extreme value structure. The prediction properties of the model are examined first. The results shed new light on the prediction properties of the multiple discrete-continuous extreme value model that have implications for transferability and that provide insight into how the model structure could be improved. Two approaches to transferring models are evaluated—naïve transfer and updating model constants—with measures such as log likelihood–based metrics, aggregate predictive ability, and model sensitivity to changes in demographic characteristics. Results suggest that accurate prediction of aggregate observed patterns is not an adequate yardstick with which to assess transferability; emphasis should be placed on model sensitivity to changes in explanatory variables. Updating of constants improves a transferred model's aggregate prediction ability, but not necessarily its policy sensitivity. The extent of transferability between regions within a state is greater than that across states. Within Florida, there is greater transferability between urban regions (especially between Southeast Florida and Central Florida) than between urban and rural regions.

[1]  Roosbeh Nowrouzian,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Spatial Transferability of Tour-Generation Models , 2012 .

[2]  R. Pendyala,et al.  Coast-to-Coast Comparison of Time Use and Activity Patterns , 2000 .

[3]  Frank S. Koppelman,et al.  TRANSFERABILITY ANALYSIS OF DISAGGREGATE CHOICE MODELS , 1982 .

[4]  Frank S. Koppelman,et al.  TRANSFER MODEL UPDATING WITH DISAGGREGATE DATA , 1985 .

[5]  Khandker Nurul Habib,et al.  Modelling daily activity program generation considering within-day and day-to-day dynamics in activity-travel behaviour , 2008 .

[6]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  TRANSFERABILITY AND UPDATING OF DISAGGREGATE TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS , 1976 .

[7]  Stephane Hess,et al.  Review of Evidence for Temporal Transferability of Mode-Destination Models , 2010 .

[8]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  TESTS OF THE SCALING APPROACH TO TRANSFERRING DISAGGREGATE TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS , 1985 .

[9]  Chandra Bhat,et al.  Computationally efficient forecasting procedures for Kuhn-Tucker consumer demand model systems: Application to residential energy consumption analysis , 2021, Journal of Choice Modelling.

[10]  Khandker Nurul Habib,et al.  Modeling Daily Activity Program Generation Considering Within-Day and Day-to-Day Dynamics in Activity-Travel Behavior , 2007 .

[11]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A household-level activity pattern generation model with an application for Southern California , 2013 .

[12]  C. Bhat The multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model : Role of utility function parameters, identification considerations, and model extensions , 2008 .

[13]  Nina Karasmaa,et al.  Evaluation of Transfer Methods for Spatial Travel Demand Models , 2007 .

[14]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  Spatial Transferability of the Albatross Model System: Empirical Evidence from Two Case Studies , 2002 .

[15]  J. LaFountain Inc. , 2013, American Art.

[16]  Sujan Sikder,et al.  Spatial transferability of travel forecasting models: a review and synthesis , 2013 .