Perception Meets Examination: Studying Deceptive Behaviors in VR

Students cheating on an exam in an academic setting creates an environment where one person (the student) must reason about the perception of another (the teacher). In exploring the student’s mindset, trends concerning how humans make decisions based on their understanding of another human’s intentions and knowledge can be uncovered. In this work, we study human cheating behavior through simulated examinations in virtual reality, showing that the teacher’s animacy and orientation plays a large part in the student’s reasoning of the teacher’s awareness. By utilizing a virtual classroom setting and accurately tracking a users behavior (through head tracking, eye movement, etc.), we have also demonstrated how a novel virtual reality approach can be used for such experiments involving human behavioral observations, which can be further explored in other cognitive science research experiments.

[1]  Ana Paiva,et al.  The Great Deceivers: Virtual Agents and Believable Lies , 2013, CogSci.

[2]  Julien Pettré,et al.  The Conference in Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2014 ( PED 2014 ) A Virtual Reality Platform to Study Crowd Behaviors , 2014 .

[3]  S. Batool,et al.  Cheating Behavior among Undergraduate Students , 2011 .

[4]  Wei Liang,et al.  Earthquake Safety Training through Virtual Drills , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[5]  Brian J. Scholl,et al.  The psychophysics of chasing: A case study in the perception of animacy , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Gregory J. Cizek,et al.  Detecting and Preventing Classroom Cheating: Promoting Integrity in Assessment. Experts in Assessment. , 2003 .

[7]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  Connecting Learning Goals and Component Cognitive Skills in Digital Games , 2013, CogSci.

[8]  Michail D. Kozlov,et al.  Real Behavior in Virtual Environments: Psychology Experiments in a Simple Virtual-Reality Paradigm Using Video Games , 2010, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[9]  Rineke Verbrugge,et al.  How do adults reason about their opponent? Typologies of players in a turn-taking game , 2015, CogSci.

[10]  Vivek Bhise,et al.  Ergonomics in the Automotive Design Process , 2011 .

[11]  Carlos Eduardo S. Pires,et al.  Detection and Evaluation of Cheating on College Exams using Supervised Classification , 2012, Informatics Educ..

[12]  Wei Liang,et al.  Evaluating Human Cognition of Containing Relations with Physical Simulation , 2015, CogSci.