Applicant perceptions of selection methods for health professions education: Rationales and subgroup differences

Applicant perceptions of selection methods can affect motivation, performance and withdrawal and may therefore be of relevance in the context of widening access. However, it is unknown how applicant subgroups perceive different selection methods.

[1]  M. Groenier,et al.  Selection tools and student diversity in health professions education: a multi-site study , 2023, Advances in Health Sciences Education.

[2]  L. Grierson,et al.  Research experiences for Canadian aspiring physicians: a descriptive analysis of medical school admission policies concerning research involvement in Canada , 2022, BMC medical education.

[3]  Eddymurphy U. Akwiwu,et al.  Selection for health professions education leads to increased inequality of opportunity and decreased student diversity in The Netherlands, but lottery is no solution: A retrospective multi-cohort study , 2022, Medical teacher.

[4]  O. ten Cate Rationales for a Lottery Among the Qualified to Select Medical Trainees: Decades of Dutch Experience. , 2021, Journal of graduate medical education.

[5]  M. Born,et al.  Student ethnicity predicts social learning experiences, self‐regulatory focus and grades , 2021, Medical education.

[6]  R. Kusurkar,et al.  “As an ethnic minority, you just have to work twice as hard.” Experiences and motivation of ethnic minority students in medical education , 2021, Perspectives on Medical Education.

[7]  S. Schreurs Selection for Medical School : the quest for validity , 2020 .

[8]  M. Born,et al.  Influence of response instructions and response format on applicant perceptions of a situational judgement test for medical school selection , 2018, BMC medical education.

[9]  S. O’Flynn,et al.  A systematic review of stakeholder views of selection methods for medical schools admission , 2018, BMC medical education.

[10]  B. Burford,et al.  Widening interest, widening participation: factors influencing school students’ aspirations to study medicine , 2018, BMC medical education.

[11]  K. Stegers‐Jager Lessons learned from 15 years of non‐grades‐based selection for medical school , 2017, Medical education.

[12]  J. Cohen-schotanus,et al.  Students’ approaches to medical school choice: relationship with students’ characteristics and motivation , 2017, International journal of medical education.

[13]  R. Kusurkar,et al.  Motivation of Dutch high school students from various backgrounds for applying to study medicine: a qualitative study , 2017, BMJ Open.

[14]  J. Tendeiro,et al.  Applying Organizational Justice Theory to Admission into Higher Education: Admission from a Student Perspective , 2017 .

[15]  Sarah S. Conrad,et al.  Holistic Review in Medical School Admissions and Selection: A Strategic, Mission-Driven Response to Shifting Societal Needs , 2016, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[16]  R. Meijer,et al.  Selection of medical students on the basis of non-academic skills: is it worth the trouble? , 2016, Clinical medicine.

[17]  J. Parry,et al.  Population‐based longitudinal analyses of offer likelihood in UK medical schools: 1996–2012 , 2016, Medical education.

[18]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  Predicting performance: relative importance of students’ background and past performance , 2015, Medical education.

[19]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Ethnic and social disparities in performance on medical school selection criteria , 2015, Medical education.

[20]  M. Henderson,et al.  Medical student depression, anxiety and distress outside North America: a systematic review , 2014, Medical education.

[21]  R. D. de Vries,et al.  What must I do to succeed?: narratives from the US premedical experience. , 2014, Social science & medicine.

[22]  J. Lemay,et al.  "What Do They Want Me To Say?" The hidden curriculum at work in the medical school selection process: a qualitative study , 2012, BMC medical education.

[23]  J. Lemay,et al.  “A Chance To Show Yourself” – how do applicants approach medical school admission essays? , 2011, Medical teacher.

[24]  Barbara M. Wildemuth,et al.  Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science , 2009 .

[25]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[26]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Qualitative Analysis of Content by , 2005 .

[27]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  “Not a university type”: focus group study of social class, ethnic, and sex differences in school pupils' perceptions about medical school , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  Donald M. Truxillo,et al.  The Importance of Organizational Justice in Personnel Selection: Defining When Selection Fairness Really Matters , 2004 .

[29]  K. McIntosh,et al.  Use of the Paired-Comparison Technique to Determine the Most Valued Qualities of the McMaster Medical Programme Admissions Process , 2004, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[30]  M. A. Campion,et al.  APPLICANT REACTIONS TO SELECTION: DEVELOPMENT OF THE SELECTION PROCEDURAL JUSTICE SCALE (SPJS) , 2001 .

[31]  A. Ryan,et al.  The Effect of Selection Ratio on Perceptions of the Fairness of a Selection Test Battery , 1997 .

[32]  N. Schmitt,et al.  Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  S. Gilliland The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An Organizational Justice Perspective , 1993 .