Diagnostic image quality of a comprehensive high-pitch dual-spiral cardiothoracic CT protocol in patients with undifferentiated acute chest pain.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate diagnostic image quality of high-pitch dual source comprehensive cardiothoracic CT protocol in patients presenting with acute undifferentiated chest pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive symptomatic subjects (n=51) with undifferentiated acute chest pain underwent ECG-synchronized high-pitch dual-spiral chest CT angiography (Definition Flash, Siemens Medical Solutions, 2 × 100 kVp or 2 × 120 kV if BMI>30, collimation: 128 × 0.6mm, pitch: 3.2). Independent investigators determined the image quality of each cardiac and pulmonary vessel segment, measured contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR), and determined radiation exposure. In addition, the prevalence of CT findings (pulmonary embolism (PE), aortic dissection (AD) and significant coronary stenosis (≥ 50%)) was determined. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to determine the subpopulation with highest diagnostic quality. RESULTS Among 51 subjects (66% male, average age: 63 ± 15.8), the prevalence of positive CT findings was moderate (overall: 11.7%). Overall, image quality of the pulmonary, aortic and coronary vasculature was good (1.26 ± 0.43 and CNR: 2.52) with an average radiation dose of 3.82 mSv and 3.2% of segments rated non-evaluable. The image quality was lowest in the coronary arteries (p=0.02), depending on the heart rate (r=0.52, p<0.001). In subjects with a heart rate of ≤ 65 bpm (n=30) subjective image quality and CNR of the coronary arteries were higher (1.6 ± 0.5 vs. 2.1 ± 0.5, p=0.03 and 1.21 ± 0.3 vs. 1.02 ± 0.3, p=0.05) with only 1.5% segments classified as non-evaluable. CONCLUSION High-pitch dual-spiral comprehensive cardiothoracic CT provides low radiation exposure with excellent image quality at heart rates ≤ 65 bpm. In subjects with higher heart rates, image quality of the aortic and pulmonary vasculature remains excellent, while the assessment of the coronary arteries degrades substantially.

[1]  Shaoxiong Zhang,et al.  Comparison of image quality and arterial enhancement with a dedicated coronary CTA protocol versus a triple rule-out coronary CTA protocol. , 2009, Academic radiology.

[2]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  A systematic review on diagnostic accuracy of CT-based detection of significant coronary artery disease. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[3]  F. Bamberg,et al.  CT Coronary Angiography Is the Most Accurate and Effective Noninvasive Imaging Tool for Evaluating Patients Presenting With Chest Pain to the Emergency Department , 2009 .

[4]  M. Lauer.  Elements of danger--the case of medical imaging. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  D. Fleischmann.  Use of high concentration contrast media: principles and rationale-vascular district. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[6]  J. W. Schaeffer,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction—summary article , 2002 .

[7]  J. Mayo,et al.  Radiation exposure at chest CT: a statement of the Fleischner Society. , 2003, Radiology.

[8]  Mark Kelemen,et al.  Chest pain evaluation in the emergency department: can MDCT provide a comprehensive evaluation? , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  William Wijns,et al.  Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis. , 2007, Radiology.

[10]  F. Bamberg,et al.  Is Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography the Most Accurate and Effective Noninvasive Imaging Tool to Evaluate Patients With Acute Chest Pain in , 2009 .

[11]  Zhonghua Sun,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64 multislice CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[12]  吉田 悟.  Thoracic involvement of type A aortic dissection and intramural hematoma : diagnostic accuracy : comparison of emergency helical CT and surgical findings , 2004 .

[13]  Walter Huda,et al.  Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT. , 2008, Radiology.

[14]  Carl J Pepine,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  Alexander Crispin,et al.  Subsegmental pulmonary emboli: improved detection with thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT. , 2002, Radiology.

[16]  M. Prins,et al.  A simple diagnostic strategy in hospitalized patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism , 2006, Journal of internal medicine.

[17]  Randall C. Thompson,et al.  Radiation Dose to Patients From Cardiac Diagnostic Imaging , 2007, Circulation.

[18]  Simon Wildermuth,et al.  Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. , 2006, Radiology.

[19]  M. Reiser,et al.  Saving Dose in Triple-Rule-Out Computed Tomography Examination Using a High-Pitch Dual Spiral Technique , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[20]  R. Cury,et al.  A Comprehensive Electrocardiogram-Gated 64-Slice Multidetector Computed Tomography Imaging Protocol to Visualize the Coronary Arteries, Thoracic Aorta, and Pulmonary Vasculature in a Single Breath Hold , 2009, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[21]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Low Dose High-Pitch Spiral Acquisition 128-Slice Dual-Source Computed Tomography for the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patency , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[22]  M. Reiser,et al.  ECG-gated 64-MDCT angiography in the differential diagnosis of acute chest pain. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  S. Abbara.  Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for Early Triage of Patients with Acute Chest Pain: The ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) Trial , 2010 .

[24]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Electrocardiographically gated multi-detector row CT for assessment of valvular morphology and calcification in aortic stenosis. , 2002, Radiology.

[25]  R. Cury,et al.  Predictors of image quality of coronary computed tomography in the acute care setting of patients with chest pain. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[26]  M. Reiser,et al.  Dual-source CT for chest pain assessment , 2007, European Radiology.

[27]  W. Kalender,et al.  High-Pitch Electrocardiogram-Triggered Computed Tomography of the Chest: Initial Results , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[28]  E. Halpern,et al.  Triple-rule-out CT angiography for evaluation of acute chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome. , 2009, Radiology.

[29]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Optimization of Contrast Material Administration for Electrocardiogram-gated Computed Tomographic Angiography of the Chest , 2007, Journal of computer assisted tomography.