Simplified detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum using smear microscopy and PCR with molecular beacons.

The prompt diagnosis of smear-negative cases is a prerequisite to controlling tuberculosis (TB). Several new laboratory approaches, including nucleic acid amplification (NAA), are being evaluated in various disease settings to meet this challenge. However, NAA needs simplification before it is widely accepted. Furthermore, a supporting smear result improves confidence in and reliability of PCR. In this context, an asymmetric devR PCR assay using two molecular beacon probes for visual or fluorimetric end-point detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis was developed. The assays reproducibly detected 25 fg M. tuberculosis DNA versus 100 fg by conventional gel electrophoresis (henceforth referred to as gel assay). The devR and IS6110 PCR assays were blindly evaluated on sputum specimens obtained from a directly observed-treatment short-course centre. Universal sample processing (USP) smear microscopy and culture were used as a supportive test and the 'gold' standard, respectively. Among the 148 specimens analysed, 120 were M. tuberculosis culture-positive. Amongst the 122 direct smear-negative samples, 96 were culture-positive, of which 61 were detected by USP smear microscopy. All 35 USP smear-negative samples were positive by three or more PCR methods. devR PCR had a sensitivity of 92.5 % in the fluorimetric assay versus 86.7 % by visual inspection and 90.8 % by the gel method. IS6110 PCR performed at almost equivalent levels. devR visual and fluorimetric assays considered together yielded an increased sensitivity of 95 % without compromising on a specificity of 92.9 %. The results suggest that the USP smear test is useful for diagnosing direct smear-negative TB and judiciously restricting PCR testing to only smear-negative samples. When used together, these tests can provide rapid diagnosis of smear-negative TB in a cost-effective manner.

[1]  T. Schaberg,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis PCR assay , 1995, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[2]  Sanjay Tyagi,et al.  Molecular Beacons: Probes that Fluoresce upon Hybridization , 1996, Nature Biotechnology.

[3]  K. Feldmann,et al.  Utility of PCR in diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis , 1996, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[4]  J. Bates,et al.  Specificity of IS6110-based amplification assays for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex , 1996, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[5]  Amalio Telenti,et al.  Molecular beacon sequence analysis for detecting drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis , 1998, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  K. Radhakrishnan,et al.  Utility of PCR Assay in Diagnosis of En-Plaque Tuberculoma of the Brain , 1999, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[7]  Thomas D. Y. Chung,et al.  A Simple Statistical Parameter for Use in Evaluation and Validation of High Throughput Screening Assays , 1999, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[8]  Neetu J. Jain,et al.  Comparison of in house polymerase chain reaction with conventional techniques for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in granulomatous lymphadenopathy , 2000, Journal of clinical pathology.

[9]  Guo-Yan Luan,et al.  Molecular Beacon-Based Homogeneous Fluorescence PCR Assay for the Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases , 2000 .

[10]  D. Enarson,et al.  Technical guide: sputum examination for tuberculosis by direct microscopy in low income countries , 2000 .

[11]  P. Venkatesan,et al.  Evaluation of PCR Using TRC4 and IS6110 Primers in Detection of Tuberculous Meningitis , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[12]  R. Gandhi Implications of Low Frequency of IS6110 in Fingerprinting Field Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Kerala, India , 2001 .

[13]  Gang Bao,et al.  Shedding light on health and disease using molecular beacons. , 2003, Briefings in functional genomics & proteomics.

[14]  C. Dye,et al.  Global tuberculosis control: surveillance planning financing. WHO report 2003. , 2003 .

[15]  V. Katoch Infections due to non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). , 2004, The Indian journal of medical research.

[16]  S. Chakravorty,et al.  Detection of Acid-Fast Bacilli in Postlysis Debris of Clinical Specimens Improves the Reliability of PCR , 2005, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[17]  S. Chakravorty,et al.  Utility of Universal Sample Processing Methodology, Combining Smear Microscopy, Culture, and PCR, for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis , 2005, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[18]  S. Chakravorty,et al.  Novel Multipurpose Methodology for Detection of Mycobacteria in Pulmonary and Extrapulmonary Specimens by Smear Microscopy, Culture, and PCR , 2005, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[19]  S. Chakravorty,et al.  Diagnosis of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis by Smear, Culture, and PCR Using Universal Sample Processing Technology , 2005, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[20]  PCR amplification of shorter fragments from the devR (Rv3133c) gene significantly increases the sensitivity of tuberculosis diagnosis. , 2006, FEMS microbiology letters.