A comparison of five sampling techniques to estimate surface fuel loading in montane forests

Designing a fuel-sampling program that accurately and efficiently assesses fuel load at relevant spatial scales requires knowledge of each sample method’s strengths and weaknesses. We obtained loading values for six fuel components using five fuel load sampling techniques at five locations in western Montana, USA. The techniques included fixed-area plots, planar intersect, photoloads, a photoload macroplot, and a photo series. For each of the six fuels, we compared (1) the relative differences in load values among techniques and (2) the differences in load between each method and a reference sample. Totals from each method were rated for how much they deviated from totals for the reference in each fuel category. The planar-intersect method, which used 2.50 km of transects, was rated best overall for assessing the six fuels. Bootstrapping showed that at least 1.50 km of transect were needed to obtain estimates that approximate the reference sample. A newly developed photoload method, which compared fuel conditions on the forest floor with sets of pictures calibrated for load by fuel type, compared well with the reference and planar intersect. The commonly used photo series consistently produced higher mean load estimates than any other method for total fine woody debris (0.05–0.20 kg m–2) and logs (0.50–1.25 kg m–2).

[1]  James K. Brown,et al.  Handbook for inventorying surface fuels and biomass in the interior West. General technical report , 1982 .

[2]  R. Keenan,et al.  Analysis of sampling methods for coarse woody debris , 2004 .

[3]  Robert E. Keane,et al.  The photoload sampling technique: estimating surface fuel loadings from downward-looking photographs of synthetic fuelbeds , 2007 .

[4]  Jw Van Wagdendonk,et al.  Physical properties of woody fuel particles of Sierra Nevada conifers , 1996 .

[5]  M. R. Reynolds.  Estimating the error in model predictions. , 1984 .

[6]  F. Albini.  Estimating Wildfire Behavior and Effects , 1976 .

[7]  James K. Brown.  A Planar Intersect Method for Sampling Fuel Volume and Surface Area , 1971 .

[8]  W. C. Fischer.  Photo guide for appraising downed woody fuels in Montana forests: Interior ponderosa pine, ponderosa pine - larch - Douglas-fir, larch - Douglas-fir, and interior Douglas-fir cover types , 1981 .

[9]  M. A. Fosberg,et al.  Drying Rates of Heartwood Below Fiber Saturation , 1970 .

[10]  H. Levene.  Robust tests for equality of variances , 1961 .

[11]  Mark H. Hansen,et al.  Line intersect sampling of wooded strips , 1985 .

[12]  Karen L. Waddell,et al.  Sampling coarse woody debris for multiple attributes in extensive resource inventories , 2002 .

[13]  I. Vanha-Majamaa,et al.  Optimal sample and plot size for inventory of field and ground layer vegetation in a mature Myrtillus-type boreal spruce forest , 1998 .

[14]  A. C. Dibble,et al.  Does the Lack of Reference Ecosystems Limit Our Science? A Case Study in Nonnnative Invasive Plants as Forest Fuels , 2005, Journal of Forestry.

[15]  D. H. Knight,et al.  Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology , 1974 .

[16]  Robert E. Keane,et al.  First Order Fire Effects Model: FOFEM 4.0, user's guide , 1997 .

[17]  J. Gove,et al.  Critical point relascope sampling for unbiased volume estimation of downed coarse woody debris , 2005 .

[18]  Philip N. Omi,et al.  Reduction of Fire Hazard Through Thinning/Residue Disposal in the Urban Interface , 1998 .

[19]  De Vries.  Multi-Stage Line Intersect Sampling , 1974 .

[20]  James K. Brown.  Handbook for inventorying downed woody material , 1974 .

[21]  Stephen J. Titus,et al.  Sample size and variability of fuel weight estimates in natural stands of lodgepole pine , 1988 .

[22]  B. Brookshire,et al.  Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project: site history, soils, landforms, woody and herbaceous vegetation, down wood, and inventory methods for the landscape experiment. , 2000 .

[23]  W. G. Warren,et al.  A Line Intersect Technique for Assessing Logging Waste , 1964 .

[24]  Photo series for quantifying forest residues in the coastal Douglas-fir-hemlock type. , 1976 .

[25]  Roger D. Ottmar,et al.  Characterizing fuels in the 21st Century , 2001 .

[26]  G. Ståhl,et al.  Transect relascope sampling: A method for the quantification of coarse woody debris , 1998 .

[27]  Van Wagner.  The Line Intersect Method in Forest Fuel Sampling , 1968 .

[28]  Daniel P. Bebber,et al.  Prism sweeps for coarse woody debris , 2003 .

[29]  Jerry Williams,et al.  Protecting People and Sustaining Resources in Fire-Adapted Ecosystems A Cohesive Strategy , 2000 .

[30]  Duncan C. Lutes.  Comparison of methods for the quantification of coarse woody debris and identification of its spatial scale| A study from the Tenderfoot Creek Experimental Forest, Montana , 1999 .

[31]  Jeffrey H. Gove,et al.  Comparing line-intersect, fixed-area, and point relascope sampling for dead and downed coarse woody material in a managed northern hardwood forest , 2004 .

[32]  Lisa J. Bate,et al.  Performance of sampling methods to estimate log characteristics for wildlife , 2004 .

[33]  W. Laycock,et al.  Evaluation of a technique for measuring canopy volume of shrubs. , 2002 .

[34]  J. Hazard,et al.  Simulation studies on line intersect sampling of forest residue. II , 1986 .

[35]  J. Gove,et al.  Perpendicular distance sampling: an alternative method for sampling downed coarse woody debris , 2003 .

[36]  W. R. Buckland,et al.  Contributions to Probability and Statistics , 1960 .

[37]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Testing the Accuracy , 1977 .