Representational similarity of actions in the human brain

Visual processing of actions is supported by a network of brain regions in occipito-temporal, parietal, and premotor cortex in the primate brain, known as the Action Observation Network (AON). What remain unclear are the representational properties of each node of this network. In this study, we investigated the representational content of brain areas in AON using fMRI, representational similarity analysis (RSA), and modeling. Subjects were shown video clips of three agents performing eight different actions during fMRI scanning. We then computed the representational dissimilarity matrices (RDMs) for each brain region, and compared them with that of two sets of model representations that were constructed based on computer vision and semantic attributes. Our findings reveal that different nodes of the AON have different representational properties. PSTS as the visual area of the AON represents high level visual features such as movement kinematics. As one goes higher in the AON hierarchy, representations become more abstract and semantic as our results revealed that parietal cortex represents several aspects of actions such as action category, intention of the action, and target of the action. These results suggest that during visual processing of actions, pSTS pools information from visual cortex to compute movement kinematics, and passes that information to higher levels of AON coding semantics of actions such as action category, intention of action, and target of action, consistent with computational models of visual action recognition.

[1]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Human action recognition by learning bases of action attributes and parts , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[2]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[3]  L. Tyler,et al.  Object-Specific Semantic Coding in Human Perirhinal Cortex , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Recognizing action at a distance , 2003, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[5]  Carlo Tomasi,et al.  Good features to track , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[6]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[8]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Deep Supervised, but Not Unsupervised, Models May Explain IT Cortical Representation , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[10]  T. Poggio,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  G. Orban,et al.  Coding observed motor acts: different organizational principles in the parietal and premotor cortex of humans. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  James W. Davis,et al.  The Recognition of Human Movement Using Temporal Templates , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  Guy A. Orban,et al.  The organization of the posterior parietal cortex devoted to upper limb actions: An fMRI study , 2015, Human brain mapping.