A HOME RANGE MODEL INCORPORATING BIOLOGICAL ATTRACTION POINTS

SUMMARY (1) A distinction is made between the domain and utilization distribution of an animal's space-use pattern, and the need for a reappraisal of model-based approaches to the description of utilization distributions is indicated. In particular, the symmetry of the widely used bivariate normal model is considered to provide an inadequate characterization of individual space-use intensity in many ecological situations. (2) A field worker is often aware of the position of biological attraction points, termed nuclei, of which there may be several for a particular home range. There is evidence that such nuclei have important influences over the space utilization intensity of a given individual. The home range model proposed here assumes a circular normal distribution of activity about each nucleus. The strength and range of the attractive fields about each nucleus are parameters which may be estimated. (3) Independent fixes of an individual's locations are used to obtain model parameter estimates using the Maximum Likelihood method, enabling a description of the utilization distribution, and calculation of probability domains. (4) The model is applied to field data collected from the grey squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis, Gmelin) and a hypothetical data set. The resulting domain and utilization distribution properties are discussed in relation to the bivariate normal model, and various advantages of the present model are demonstrated.

[1]  J. M. Inglis,et al.  Home Range of White-Tailed Deer in Texas Coastal Prairie Brushland , 1979 .

[2]  Ernest Thompson Seton,et al.  Life-histories of northern animals , 1909 .

[3]  C. Terman Some Dynamics of Spatial Distribution within Seminatural Populations of Prairie Deermice , 1961 .

[4]  Lucille F. Stickel,et al.  A Comparison of Certain Methods of Measuring Ranges of Small Mammals , 1954 .

[5]  W. H. Burt Territoriality and Home Range Concepts as Applied to Mammals , 1943 .

[6]  K. Dixon,et al.  Harmonic mean measure of animal activity areas , 1980 .

[7]  R. Tanaka Truthfulness of the delimited-area concept of home range in small mammals. , 1963 .

[8]  Glen C. Sanderson,et al.  The Study of Mammal Movements: A Review , 1966 .

[9]  M Mazurkiewicz Elliptical modification of the home range pattern. , 1969, Bulletin de l'Academie polonaise des sciences. Serie des sciences biologiques.

[10]  T. Getty Analysis of Central‐Place Space‐Use Patterns: The Elastic Disc Revisited , 1981 .

[11]  D. W. Krumme,et al.  The analysis of space use patterns. , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  Don W. Hayne,et al.  Calculation of Size of Home Range , 1949 .

[13]  James E. Dunn,et al.  Analysis of Radio Telemetry Data in Studies of Home Range , 1977 .

[14]  Michael H. Smith,et al.  Validity of the Center of Activity Concept , 1973 .

[15]  G. W. Snedecor Statistical Methods , 1964 .

[16]  S. Waldschmidt The Effect of Statistically Based Models on Home Range Size Estimate in Uta stansburiana , 1979 .

[17]  D. W. Macdonald,et al.  The Evaluation of Home Range Size and Configuration Using Radio Tracking Data , 1980 .

[18]  S. Kaye Movements of Harvest Mice Tagged with Gold-198 , 1961 .

[19]  E. Parzen Nonparametric Statistical Data Modeling , 1979 .

[20]  Lowell Adams,et al.  The Internal Anatomy of Home Range , 1967 .

[21]  M. J. Fryer A Review of Some Non-parametric Methods of Density Estimation , 1977 .

[22]  W. V. Winkle COMPARISON OF SEVERAL PROBABILISTIC HOME-RANGE MODELS' , 1975 .

[23]  Ernest D. Ables,et al.  Home-Range Studies of Red Foxes (Vulpes Vulpes) , 1969 .

[24]  R. Jennrich,et al.  Measurement of non-circular home range. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  W. G. Cochran Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests , 1954 .

[26]  M. Mazurkiewicz,et al.  Shape, size and distribution of home ranges of Clethrionomys glareolus (Schreber, 1780) , 1971 .

[27]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..