Misleading consequences of omitting vital factors when attempting assessments of radiation risks in terms of absorbed dose
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Hewitt,et al. Malignant disease in childhood and diagnostic irradiation in utero. , 1956, Lancet.
[2] H. Kato,et al. Lung cancer incidence among Japanese A-bomb survivors, 1950-80. , 1987, Journal of radiation research.
[3] J. Hamstra. The radiological consequences and reactions in western Europe caused by the Chernobyl reactor accident as evidence to advocate reconsidering the present-day control of exposures to low-level ionising radiation , 1988 .
[4] E. Knox,et al. Pregnancy x-rays and childhood cancers: effects of exposure age and radiation dose , 1988 .
[5] E. Knox,et al. Prenatal irradiation and childhood cancer , 1987 .
[6] J. Rotblat. TECHNICAL NOTE: The cancer risk from low doses of radiation: What can be learned from the A-bomb survivors? , 1988 .
[7] D L Preston,et al. Studies of the mortality of A-bomb survivors. 8. Cancer mortality, 1950-1982. , 1987, Radiation research.
[8] R. Mole,et al. Reflections on the terms stochastic and non-stochastic as currently used in radiological protection. , 1982, The British journal of radiology.
[9] E. Knox,et al. Background radiation and childhood cancers , 1988 .