论文信息 - TRISS methodology: an inappropriate tool for comparing outcomes between trauma centers. - 字舞流文

TRISS methodology: an inappropriate tool for comparing outcomes between trauma centers.

D. Demetriades | L. Chan | J. Sava | T. Berne | C. Preston | G. Gruzinski | G. V. Velmanos | Christy Preston | George V Velmanos

[1] D. McArthur,et al. Patient volume per surgeon does not predict survival in adult level I trauma centers. , 2001, The Journal of trauma.

[2] W. Shoemaker,et al. TRISS methodology in trauma: the need for alternatives , 1998, The British journal of surgery.

[3] S P Baker,et al. A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring. , 1997, The Journal of trauma.

[4] Kagan Rj,et al. The impact of the volume of neurotrauma experience on mortality after head injury. , 1994 .

[5] G. Rozycki,et al. Results of a multi-institutional outcome assessment: results of a structured peer review of TRISS-designated unexpected outcomes. , 1992, The Journal of trauma.

[6] P. Kalman,et al. Is outcome worse in a small volume Canadian trauma centre? , 1991, The Journal of trauma.

[7] C. Cayten,et al. Limitations of the TRISS method for interhospital comparisons: a multihospital study. , 1990, The Journal of trauma.

[8] T A Gennarelli,et al. A revision of the Trauma Score. , 1989, The Journal of trauma.