Performance Analysis of Various Routing Protocols for Motorway Surveillance System Cameras' Network

The Motorway Surveillance System (MSS) is one of the most important technologies used to collect information about road conditions and then provide that collected information to motorway users. The routing in networks used by these systems is a critical task due to the highly dynamic environments. This paper presents performance evaluations, comparisons, and analysis for three routing protocols (AODV, DSR, and OLSR) on a selected MSS scenario. The evaluation and analysis were performed for several different performance metrics and under varying network conditions. The results demonstrate that, under various vehicle speeds and several different traffic loads, AODV outperforms DSR and OLSR protocols, with respect to network throughput (by 36.7% and 9.1%, respectively) and protocol overhead (by 23% and 45.2%, respectively). In contrast, the packet transmission delay when using DSR is shorter than when using AODV (by 26.7%) and OLSR (by 17.1%). The conclusions of this study are important to provide a qualitative assessment of the applicability of these protocols to real-world motorway surveillance systems, and also as a basis for developing new ways to improve routing performance in this type of systems.

[1]  Ahmed Helmy,et al.  Towards mobility-rich analysis in ad hoc networks: using contraction, expansion and hybrid models , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37577).

[2]  Subir Kumar Sarkar,et al.  Scenario based Performance Analysis of AODV and OLSR in Mobile Ad hoc Networks , 2007 .

[3]  S. Tamilarasan,et al.  Performance Analysis and Comparison of Different Routing Protocols in MANET , 2011 .

[4]  S. Bhatia,et al.  Performance of mobile ad hoc networking routing protocols in realistic scenarios , 2003, IEEE Military Communications Conference, 2003. MILCOM 2003..

[5]  Raúl Aquino-Santos,et al.  Performance evaluation of routing protocols in vehicular ad-hoc networks , 2005, Int. J. Ad Hoc Ubiquitous Comput..

[6]  S. Jaap,et al.  Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks in City Traffic Scenarios , 2005 .

[7]  Geetha Jayakumar,et al.  Performance Comparison of Two On-demand Routing Protocols for Ad-hoc Networks based on Random Way Point Mobility Model , 2008 .

[8]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks , 2001, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[9]  David A. Maltz,et al.  A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols , 1998, MobiCom '98.

[10]  Scott F. Midkiff,et al.  A framework for wireless ad hoc routing protocols , 2003, 2003 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking, 2003. WCNC 2003..

[11]  Philippe Jacquet,et al.  Comparative Study of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-hoc NETworks , 2002 .

[12]  Wen-Tsuen Chen,et al.  Design and Implementation of a Real Time Video Surveillance System with Wireless Sensor Networks , 2008, VTC Spring 2008 - IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference.

[13]  A. Varga,et al.  Using the OMNeT++ discrete event simulation system in education , 1999 .

[14]  Bartosz Mielczarek,et al.  Scenario-based performance analysis of routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc networks , 1999, MobiCom.

[15]  Bo Yan,et al.  Measurement study on wireless camera networks , 2008, 2008 Second ACM/IEEE International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras.

[16]  Philippe Jacquet,et al.  Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR) , 2003, RFC.

[17]  M. Elshaikh,et al.  Measurement study on the end-to-end data transmission in motorways surveillance system using Wireless Ad Hoc Camera Networks (WAHCN) , 2011, 2011 2nd International Conference on Engineering and Industries (ICEI).

[18]  Lars Wolf,et al.  Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks in Typical Road Traffic Scenarios , 2005 .