Antibiotic Bone Cement Cannot Reduce Deep Infection After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Deep infection following total knee arthroplasty is a catastrophic complication. Recently, antibiotic-loaded bone cement has been applied to prevent deep infection after total joint arthroplasty. However, there is still controversy about the prophylactic effect of antibiotic-loaded bone cement after primary total knee arthroplasty. This study reviewed 2293 patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty with 1-year follow-up at the authors' hospital between February 2003 and October 2012 (mean±SD age, 64.8±10.7 years; male-to-female ratio, 1:5). All potential risk factors, including sex, age, height, weight, body mass index, diagnosis (osteoarthritis or other), diabetic status, operative time (categorized as either ≤120 minutes or >120 minutes), bilateral/unilateral procedure, surgeon volume (categorized as either ≥30 cases/year or <30 cases/year), and bone cement type, were collected. A total of 10 patients who had deep infection were identified during follow-up. Rates of deep infection for antibiotic-loaded bone cement and for plain cement were both 0.40%, and the difference was not significant with Fisher's exact test (P=1.000). Adjusted for the unevenly distributed risk factors (age, height, weight, diagnosis, bilateral/unilateral surgery, and operative time) in both groups, the results of logistic analysis showed that antibiotic-loaded bone cement did not reduce the rate of deep infection following primary total knee arthroplasty compared with plain cement (P=.865; odds ratio, 0.835; 95% confidence interval, 0.105-6.713). The study showed that antibiotic-loaded bone cement had no effect on the prevention of deep infection after primary total knee arthroplasty.

[1]  Shaun M. Purcell,et al.  Statistical power and significance testing in large-scale genetic studies , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[2]  M. Inacio,et al.  Risk factors associated with deep surgical site infections after primary total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 56,216 knees. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  P. Guirro,et al.  The use of erythromycin and colistin-loaded cement in total knee arthroplasty does not reduce the incidence of infection: a prospective randomized study in 3000 knees. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  M. Denti,et al.  Prophylactic use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in primary total knee replacement , 2010, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[5]  F. Razak,et al.  Antibiotic bone cement and the incidence of deep infection after total knee arthroplasty. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  D. Fithian,et al.  Outcomes of routine use of antibiotic-loaded cement in primary total knee arthroplasty. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  O. Furnes,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement used in primary total hip arthroplasty. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  Á. Soriano,et al.  Timing of antibiotic prophylaxis for primary total knee arthroplasty performed during ischemia. , 2008, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[9]  J. Block,et al.  Reducing the risk of deep wound infection in primary joint arthroplasty with antibiotic bone cement. , 2005, Orthopedics.

[10]  B. Homey,et al.  Prothesenunverträglichkeit bei Typ-IV-Sensibilisierung gegen Knochenzement , 2004, Der Hautarzt.

[11]  R. Bourne Prophylactic use of antibiotic bone cement: an emerging standard--in the affirmative. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  P. Mertl,et al.  Effectiveness of Gentamicin-Impregnated Cement in the Prevention of Deep Wound Infection After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2003, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[13]  Chuan‐Mu Chen,et al.  The combination of systemic antibiotics and antibiotics impregnated cement in primary total knee arthroplasty in patients of rheumatoid arthritis--evaluation of 60 knees. , 2003, Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA.

[14]  W. Lo,et al.  Cefuroxime-Impregnated Cement in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized Study of Three Hundred and Forty Knees , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  W. Lo,et al.  Cefuroxime-impregnated cement at primary total knee arthroplasty in diabetes mellitus. A prospective, randomised study. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  H. Busscher,et al.  Gentamicin release from polymethylmethacrylate bone cements and Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation , 2000, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[17]  W D Plummer,et al.  Power and sample size calculations for studies involving linear regression. , 1998, Controlled clinical trials.

[18]  David A. Wolff,et al.  Total Knee Replacement Infection After 2-Stage Reimplantation: Results of Subsequent 2-Stage Reimplantation , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  W J Martone,et al.  CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. , 1992, American journal of infection control.

[20]  H. Buchholz,et al.  [Depot effects of various antibiotics mixed with Palacos resins]. , 1970, Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen.

[21]  B. Homey,et al.  [Sensitivity to constituents of bone cement in a patient with joint prosthesis]. , 2004, Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete.

[22]  W. Dupont,et al.  Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. , 1990, Controlled clinical trials.