Real-time computer modeling of weakness following stroke optimizes robotic assistance for movement therapy

This paper describes the development of a novel control system for a robotic arm orthosis for assisting patients in motor training following stroke. The robot allows naturalistic motion of the arm and is as mechanically compliant as a human therapist's arms. This compliance preserves the connection between effort and error that appears essential for motor learning, but presents a challenge: accurately creating desired movements requires that the robot form a model of the patient's weakness, since the robot cannot simply stiffly drive the arm along the desired path. We show here that a standard model-based adaptive controller allows the robot to form such a model of the patient and complete movements accurately. However, we found that the human motor system, when coupled to such an adaptive controller, reduces its own participation, allowing the adaptive controller to take over the performance of the task. This presents a problem for motor training, since active engagement by the patient is important for stimulating neuroplasticity. We show that this problem can be solved by making the controller continuously attempt to reduce its assistance when errors are small. The resulting robot successfully assists stroke patients in moving in desired patterns with very small errors, but also encourages intense participation by the patient. Such robot assistance may optimally provoke neural plasticity, since it intensely engages both descending and ascending motor pathways.

[1]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[2]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robotic Devices for Movement Therapy After Stroke: Current Status and Challenges to Clinical Acceptance , 2002, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[3]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Robot dynamics and control , 1989 .

[4]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robotics and other devices in the treatment of patients recovering from stroke , 2004, Current neurology and neuroscience reports.

[5]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  A pneumatic robot for re-training arm movement after stroke: rationale and mechanical design , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[6]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Robot-enhanced motor learning: accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  R A Scheidt,et al.  Learning to move amid uncertainty. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  R. Riener,et al.  ARMin - design of a novel arm rehabilitation robot , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[9]  L. Cohen,et al.  Role of voluntary drive in encoding an elementary motor memory. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  R. Seliktar,et al.  Design and testing of WREX , 2004 .

[11]  J. Patton,et al.  Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  J. Schaechter Motor rehabilitation and brain plasticity after hemiparetic stroke , 2004, Progress in Neurobiology.

[14]  M. J. D. Powell,et al.  Radial basis functions for multivariable interpolation: a review , 1987 .

[15]  B. Dobkin Strategies for stroke rehabilitation , 2004, The Lancet Neurology.

[16]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Human-robot cooperative movement training: Learning a novel sensory motor transformation during walking with robotic assistance-as-needed , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[18]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Control of a Pneumatic Orthosis for Upper Extremity Stroke Rehabilitation , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[19]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[20]  P. Crago,et al.  Effects of voluntary force generation on the elastic components of endpoint stiffness , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Tariq Rahman,et al.  16 Design and Testing of WREX , 2004 .

[22]  K. Furie,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2007, Circulation.

[23]  H. Gomi,et al.  Task-Dependent Viscoelasticity of Human Multijoint Arm and Its Spatial Characteristics for Interaction with Environments , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  C. Braun,et al.  Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  Robert Riener,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities , 2005, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[26]  G. Kwakkel Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation.

[27]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Robotic movement training as an optimization problem: designing a controller that assists only as needed , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[28]  R A Scheidt,et al.  Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  J. Krakauer Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. , 2006, Current opinion in neurology.

[30]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. , 1997, Science.

[31]  Lakmal Seneviratne,et al.  Adaptive Control Of Robot Manipulators , 1992, Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[32]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[33]  S. Hesse,et al.  Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control , 2003, Current opinion in neurology.

[34]  L. Lippman,et al.  Consequences of error production in a perceptual-motor task. , 1997, The Journal of general psychology.

[35]  J. Burdick,et al.  Implications of Assist-As-Needed Robotic Step Training after a Complete Spinal Cord Injury on Intrinsic Strategies of Motor Learning , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.