Spherical harmonic analysis of paleomagnetic data: The case of linear mapping

We consider the problem of describing the ancient magnetic field as completely as possible using paleomagnetic data. One of the best ways to do this is to represent the field by the use of Gauss coefficients. Unlike ordinary cases, however, spherical harmonic analysis of paleomagnetic data is a complicated problem because (1) the data cannot be considered as contemporaneous and (2) they are mostly available only in the form of directions. If the mapping between the model parameters (Gauss coefficients) and the data is linear (e.g., the three components of the field), there is one-to-one correspondence between the means of the parameters and the means of the data. Conventional least squares techniques can be applied to the means as the relations between the data and parameters are the same as in the instantaneous case. One-to-one correspondence also exists between the variances of the parameters and the variances of the data. However, the functions appearing in these relations are not orthogonal to each other, and the matrix to be inverted is quite ill conditioned. For magnetic field directions that are nonlinearly related to Gauss coefficients, one-to-one correspondence is completely absent between the means (variances) of the parameters and those of the data. This means that inversion becomes quite complicated because the mean of such data contains information on both the mean and fluctuations of the parameters. We applied inversion to the paleointensity data of the past 5 Myr and obtained the means and variances of Gauss coefficients for that period. The means are well determined and show that the time-averaged field is dominated by the axial dipole component. It is more axisymmetric than the recent field, suggesting that equatorial dipole components are largely averaged out as assumed by paleomagnetic dipole hypothesis. Inversion of the variances gave less well determined results. Among the variances of Gauss coefficients that are significantly different from zero that of the axial dipole is much larger than those of other coefficients, indicating that the observed variation in paleointensity is largely due to the fluctuation of the magnitude of the dipole moment.

[1]  Jeremy Bloxham,et al.  Time‐dependent mapping of the magnetic field at the core‐mantle boundary , 1992 .

[2]  M. Kono Uniqueness Problems in the Spherical Harmonic Analysis of the Geomagnetic Field Direction Data , 1976 .

[3]  Catherine Constable,et al.  Palaeosecular variation recorded by lava flows over the past five million years , 1996, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[4]  Distributions of paleomagnetic directions and poles , 1997 .

[5]  R. Wilson Dipole Offset-The Time-Average Palaeomagnetic Field Over the Past 25 Million Years , 1971 .

[6]  David Gubbins,et al.  Persistent patterns in the geomagnetic field over the past 2.5 Myr , 1993, Nature.

[7]  David Gubbins,et al.  Geomagnetic field analysis ‐ I. Stochastic inversion , 1983 .

[8]  Jeremy Bloxham,et al.  Geomagnetic field analysis—III. Magnetic fields on the core—mantle boundary , 1985 .

[9]  E. Thellier,et al.  Sur l'intensite du champ magnetique terrestre dans le passe historique et geologique , 1959 .

[10]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  Long‐term geometry of the geomagnetic field for the last five million years: An updated secular variation database , 1994 .

[11]  D. Jackson The use of a priori data to resolve non‐uniqueness in linear inversion , 1979 .

[12]  Vincent Courtillot,et al.  On low-degree spherical harmonic models of paleosecular variation , 1996 .

[13]  M. Kono,et al.  PALEOSECULAR VARIATION OF FIELD INTENSITIES AND DIPOLE MOMENTS , 1996 .

[14]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  Uniqueness of mainly dipolar magnetic fields recovered from directional data , 1997 .

[15]  C. E. Barton,et al.  International Geomagnetic Reference Field : The seventh generation , 1997 .

[16]  M. Proctor,et al.  Analysis of Geomagnetic Directinal Data , 1990 .

[17]  Catherine Constable,et al.  The time‐averaged geomagnetic field: global and regional biases for 0–5 Ma , 1997 .

[18]  Catherine Constable,et al.  The time-averaged geomagnetic field as recorded by lava flows over the past 5 Myr , 1995 .

[19]  Masaru Kono,et al.  Paleointensity database provides new resource , 1994 .

[20]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  On the interpretation of virtual geomagnetic pole (VGP) scatter curves , 1996 .

[21]  W. Lowrie,et al.  On the Representation of the Quaternary and Late Tertiary Geomagnetic Fields in Terms of Dipoles and Quadrupoles , 1973 .

[22]  D. Gubbins,et al.  The geomagnetic field over the past 5 million years , 1997 .

[23]  Catherine Constable,et al.  Statistics of the geomagnetic secular variation for the past 5 m.y. , 1988 .

[24]  Masaru Kono,et al.  Mapping the Gauss Coefficients to the Pole and the Models of Paleosecular Variation , 1995 .

[25]  Robert A. Langel,et al.  A geomagnetic field spectrum , 1982 .

[26]  George E. Backus,et al.  Non‐uniqueness of the external geomagnetic field determined by surface intensity measurements , 1970 .

[27]  M. Kono Paleosecular Variation in Field Directions Due to Randomly Varying Gauss Coefficients. , 1997 .