Access control via coalitional power game

This paper considers the problem of access control in the uplink transmission of an OFDMA femtocell network. An underlying noncooperative power game has been devised, based on which a coalition game is formulated by taking a suitable value function. Only two complementary coalitions are allowed to exist in order to reflect the set of transmitters connected to either the macro base station or the femto access point. The transmitters in the same coalition cooperate by operating on non-interfering subchannels, while those in the complementary coalition are assumed to operate so as to cause maximum jamming. The value of a coalition is obtained as the max-min of utility sum of each individual in the given coalition. In the process, we also examine the optimal jamming strategy of the complementary coalition. Finally, we argue that the obtained value function cannot be super-additive. Since the super-additivity property is required for some of the solutions of cooperative game theory, we resort to the Shapley value solution, for which the super-additivity need not hold, to allocate the payoff to each user in a given coalition. Assuming that the transmitters want to be in the coalition that maximizes their payoff, we form a Markov model to obtain the stable coalition structure. We take these stable coalition structures as the required solution of our access control problem.

[1]  Jie Zhang,et al.  OFDMA Femtocells: Intracell Handover for Interference and Handover Mitigation in Two-Tier Networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE Wireless Communication and Networking Conference.

[2]  Ulrich Schwalbe,et al.  Dynamic Coalition Formation and the Core , 2002 .

[3]  Essam Sourour,et al.  A study of access methods effect on the performance of two-tier LTE femtocell networks , 2011, 2011 28th National Radio Science Conference (NRSC).

[4]  Zhu Han,et al.  Coalitional game theory for communication networks , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[5]  R. J. Aumann,et al.  Cooperative games with coalition structures , 1974 .

[6]  Dusit Niyato,et al.  Game Theory in Wireless and Communication Networks: Fundamentals of game theory , 2011 .

[7]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Limited access to OFDMA femtocells , 2009, 2009 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[8]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Downlink Femtocell Networks: Open or Closed? , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[9]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Game theory - Analysis of Conflict , 1991 .

[10]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Access control mechanisms for femtocells , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[11]  Walid Saad,et al.  Game Theory in Wireless and Communication Networks: Applications of game theory in communications and networking , 2011 .

[12]  Mokshay M. Madiman,et al.  Cores of Cooperative Games in Information Theory , 2008, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[13]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Femtocell networks: a survey , 2008, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[14]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Access methods to WiMAX femtocells: A downlink system-level case study , 2008, 2008 11th IEEE Singapore International Conference on Communication Systems.

[15]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Open vs. Closed Access Femtocells in the Uplink , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[16]  Zhu Han,et al.  Game Theory in Wireless and Communication Networks: Theory, Models, and Applications , 2011 .