The Paradoxical Effects of Digital Artifacts on Innovation Practices

ABSTRACT Digital artefacts are increasingly used for supporting innovation practices, implying a growing need to better understand their role in different contexts. In this paper, we study how digital artefacts enable and constrain innovation practices by means of an in-depth, multi-year qualitative field study at a software firm. Analysing the usage of PowerPoint, as a dominant digital innovation artefact, we identify three paradoxes – conflicting yet interdependent tensions of digital artefacts in innovation practices: (1) Freedom and Captivity, (2) Clarity and Ambiguity, and (3) Scarcity and Abundance. Via a dialectic synthesis of the three paradoxes and an extension to modelling tools, we develop a substantive theory of the paradoxical effects of digital artefacts on innovation practices. We discuss theoretical implications for research on affordances and outline a path for research on IT paradoxes. We also offer practical implications by illustrating the paradoxical effects of using digital innovation artefacts and suggesting appropriate coping strategies.

[1]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World , 2017, MIS Q..

[3]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic equilibrium Model of Organizing , 2011 .

[4]  Richard V. McCarthy,et al.  Does UML make the grade? Insights from the software development community , 2005, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[5]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  The cognitive style of PowerPoint , 2003 .

[6]  Jochen Runde,et al.  Technological Objects, Social Positions, and the Transformational Model of Social Activity , 2013, MIS Q..

[7]  Alexander Richter,et al.  Malleable End-User Software , 2013, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[8]  Allison W. McCulloch,et al.  Developing and Using a Codebook for the Analysis of Interview Data: An Example from a Professional Development Research Project , 2011 .

[9]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993, CACM.

[10]  Mark Zachry,et al.  Communicative Practices in Workplaces and the Professions: Cultural Perspectives on the Regulation of Discourse and Organizations , 2007 .

[11]  Karen Locke,et al.  Appealing Work: An Investigation of How Ethnographic Texts Convince , 1993 .

[12]  J. Yates.  The PowerPoint Presentation and Its Corollaries: How Genres Shape Communicative Action in Organizations , 2004 .

[13]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  Bodies, Technologies and Action Possibilities , 2010 .

[14]  A. Thakor,et al.  Competing Values Leadership: Creating Value in Organizations , 2006 .

[15]  David E. Avison,et al.  The paradox of information systems: strategic value and low status , 1999, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Ai Yu,et al.  Social Media, Institutional Innovation and Affordances: The Case of Free Lunch for Children in China , 2014, ICIS.

[17]  David Stark,et al.  PowerPoint in Public , 2008 .

[18]  J. Ford,et al.  Organizational change in and out of dualities and paradox. , 1988 .

[19]  Florian Matthes,et al.  Generating Visualizations of Enterprise Architectures using Model Transformations , 2007, Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Archit. Int. J. Concept. Model..

[20]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[21]  S. Faraj,et al.  The Materiality of Technology: An Affordance Perspective , 2013 .

[22]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity , 2008, MIS Q..

[23]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Paradox Research in Management Science: Looking Back to Move Forward , 2016 .

[24]  Constantine Andriopoulos,et al.  Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[25]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[26]  Peter Ping Li,et al.  Toward an integrative framework of indigenous research: The geocentric implications of Yin-Yang Balance , 2011, Asia Pacific Journal of Management.

[27]  H. Rheinberger.  Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube , 1997 .

[28]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies , 2011, MIS Q..

[29]  Joseph T Rouse,et al.  Practice Theory , 2006 .

[30]  Runtian Jing,et al.  A Yin-Yang Model of Organizational Change: The Case of Chengdu Bus Group , 2014, Management and Organization Review.

[31]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[32]  三嶋 博之.  The theory of affordances , 2008 .

[33]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[34]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[35]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[36]  A. Bullinger,et al.  Integrating Inside and Outside Innovators: A Sociotechnical Systems Perspective , 2009 .

[37]  Norbert Seyff,et al.  FLEXISKETCH TEAM: Collaborative Sketching and Notation Creation on the Fly , 2015, 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering.

[38]  W. Orlikowski.  Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[39]  Amany R. Elbanna,et al.  From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures , 2001 .

[40]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[41]  Rachel K. E. Bellamy,et al.  Flexible modeling tools for pre-requirements analysis: conceptual architecture and research challenges , 2010, OOPSLA.

[42]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  A Foundation for the Study of IT Effects: A New Look at DeSanctis and Poole's Concepts of Structural Features and Spirit , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Yiannis Gabriel.  Against the Tyranny of PowerPoint: Technology-in-Use and Technology Abuse , 2008 .

[44]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[45]  D. Silverman.  Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction , 1994 .

[46]  A. H. van de Ven,et al.  Integrating Dialectical and Paradox Perspectives on Managing Contradictions in Organizations , 2017 .

[47]  Erik Kamsties,et al.  Taming Ambiguity in Natural Language Requirements , 2005 .

[48]  Kevin C. Desouza.  Intrapreneurship: Managing Ideas Within Your Organization , 2011 .

[49]  Wendy K. Smith.  Dynamic Decision Making: A Model of Senior Leaders Managing Strategic Paradoxes , 2014 .

[50]  Marianne W. Lewis.  Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide , 2000 .

[51]  Jan Muntermann,et al.  Paradoxes and the Nature of Ambidexterity in IT Transformation Programs , 2015, Inf. Syst. Res..

[52]  Robert DeLine,et al.  Let's go to the whiteboard: how and why software developers use drawings , 2007, CHI.

[53]  Erik Kamsties,et al.  Surfacing ambiguity in natural language requirements , 2001 .

[54]  C. Weston,et al.  Analyzing Interview Data: The Development and Evolution of a Coding System , 2001 .

[55]  Alexander Richter,et al.  From Process to Practice: Towards a Practice-based Model of Digital Innovation , 2017, ICIS.

[56]  Remco M. Dijkman,et al.  Formal Semantics and Analysis of BPMN Process Models using Petri Nets , 2007 .

[57]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Managing the Paradoxes of Mobile Technology , 2005, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[58]  Jacky Swan,et al.  Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[59]  Paul Tracey,et al.  Adding Complexity to Theories of Paradox, Tensions, and Dualities of Innovation and Change: Introduction to Organization Studies Special Issue on Paradox, Tensions, and Dualities of Innovation and Change , 2017 .

[60]  Alexander Richter,et al.  When Prototyping Meets Storytelling: Practices and Malpractices in Innovating Software Firms , 2017, 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice Track (ICSE-SEIP).

[61]  Line Dubé,et al.  Surviving the paradoxes of virtual teamwork , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[62]  Moshe Farjoun.  Beyond Dualism: Stability and Change As a Duality , 2010 .

[63]  K. Eisenhardt.  Paradox, Spirals, Ambivalence: the New Language of Change and Pluralism , 2000 .

[64]  T. Brown,et al.  Change by Design , 2011 .

[65]  Rachel K. E. Bellamy,et al.  Sketching tools for ideation: NIER track , 2011, 2011 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE).

[66]  P. Leonardi,et al.  Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World , 2013 .

[67]  Sarah Kaplan,et al.  Strategy and PowerPoint: An Inquiry into the Epistemic Culture and Machinery of Strategy Making , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[68]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Computing in Everyday Life: A Call for Research on Experiential Computing , 2010, MIS Q..

[69]  K. K. Cetina,et al.  The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory , 2001 .

[70]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other? , 2001, MIS Q..

[71]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[72]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design , 2006, First Monday.

[73]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[74]  Alexander Richter,et al.  Communicating Ideas Purposefully - toward a Design Theory of Innovation Artifacts , 2014, ECIS.

[75]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories , 1989 .

[76]  R. G. Fichman,et al.  Digital Innovation as a Fundamental and Powerful Concept in the Information Systems Curriculum , 2014, MIS Q..

[77]  Michel Avital,et al.  Designing interviews to generate rich data for information systems research , 2011, Inf. Organ..

[78]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Slip-Sliding-Away , 2015 .

[79]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Doing interpretive research , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[80]  R. Weber.  Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[81]  Dennis Schoeneborn,et al.  The Pervasive Power of PowerPoint: How a Genre of Professional Communication Permeates Organizational Communication , 2013 .

[82]  Ali Selamat,et al.  Information and Software Technology , 2014 .

[83]  Kai Riemer,et al.  Rethinking the place of the artefact in IS using Heidegger's analysis of equipment , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[84]  Jörg Becker,et al.  Guidelines of Business Process Modeling , 2000, Business Process Management.

[85]  Robert Winter,et al.  From Expert Discipline to Common Practice: A Vision and Research Agenda for Extending the Reach of Enterprise Modeling , 2018, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[86]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[87]  Sebastian Raisch,et al.  Pathways to Ambidexterity: A Process Perspective on the Exploration–Exploitation Paradox , 2017 .

[88]  Joseph A. Dawson.  Communicative Practices in Workplaces and the Professions: Cultural Perspectives on the Regulation of Discourse and Organizations , 2010 .

[89]  Mayuram S. Krishnan,et al.  The Personalization Privacy Paradox: An Empirical Evaluation of Information Transparency and the Willingness to be Profiled Online for Personalization , 2006, MIS Q..

[90]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Knowledge Collaboration in Online Communities , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[91]  Arie Y. Lewin,et al.  Management and Organization Review , 2013 .

[92]  P. Carlile.  How matter matters : objects, artifacts, and materiality in organization studies , 2013 .