Digital echocardiographic laboratory: where do we stand?

The transition to an all-digital echocardiographic laboratory has been slow despite the advantages of digital echocardiography, the dramatic improvement in computer technology, and the acceptance by all major vendors and professional organizations of the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine image-formatting standard. This review article examines some current issues in digital echocardiography, including types of digital output, disk versus network exchange, digital and clinical compression techniques, and the choice of image storage format. Although specific exceptions exist, we conclude that the optimal solution will be one based on a network exchange of formatted images that follow the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine standard, now available from several manufacturers. For a clinical interpretation, modest compression with the Joint Photography Expert Group algorithm appears acceptable, though possible enhancements to this compression standard are also discussed. We hope this review will enable the echocardiographic community to make more intelligent choices as digital storage and transmission products become available in the marketplace.

[1]  J. Thomas,et al.  Digital storage and retrieval: the future in echocardiography , 1997, Heart.

[2]  Joseph P. Murgo,et al.  Is a Full Digital Echocardiography Laboratory Feasible for Routine Daily Use? , 1996, Echocardiography.

[3]  J D Thomas,et al.  Digital formatting standards in medical imaging: a primer for echocardiographers. , 1994, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[4]  Gregory K. Wallace,et al.  JPEG still picture compression algorithm , 1991 .

[5]  J D Thomas,et al.  Digital compression of echocardiograms: impact on quantitative interpretation of color Doppler velocity. , 1996, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[6]  J D Thomas,et al.  Digital storage of echocardiograms offers superior image quality to analog storage, even with 20:1 digital compression: results of the Digital Echo Record Access Study. , 1996, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[7]  J D Thomas,et al.  The DICOM Image Formatting Standard: what it means for echocardiographers. , 1995, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[8]  James D. Thomas,et al.  Digital Storage and Analysis of Color Doppler Echocardiograms , 1997, Echocardiography.

[9]  Didier Le Gall,et al.  MPEG: a video compression standard for multimedia applications , 1991, CACM.

[10]  J D Thomas,et al.  JPEG compression of digital echocardiographic images: impact on image quality. , 1995, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[11]  H Feigenbaum,et al.  Digital recording, display, and storage of echocardiograms. , 1988, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[12]  H. Feigenbaum A digital echocardiographic laboratory. , 1994, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography.