Results of graft patency by immediate angiography in minimally invasive coronary artery surgery.

BACKGROUND Although minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) is being employed for revascularization of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) with the left internal mammary artery (LIMA), little objective data exist regarding graft patency. Because the procedure is performed on a beating heart through a limited access approach, concerns have been raised regarding the ability to perform as accurate an anastomosis compared with conventional coronary artery bypass (CAB). METHODS A prospective study of consecutive patients undergoing MIDCAB LIMA to LAD was undertaken. All procedures were performed through a limited anterior thoracotomy incision with a stabilization device. Selective angiography of the LIMA graft was performed intraoperatively or in the immediate postoperative period. RESULTS One hundred and three patients underwent the MICAB procedure. Angiographic evaluation of the anastomosis was obtained in 100 patients (97%). Angiographic graft patency was 99%, with perfect graft patency (no stenosis greater than 50%) being 91%. Three grafts were revised in the operating room. One patient underwent reoperation and 3 more underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. There were two noncardiac mortalities (1.9%), both with patent grafts. CONCLUSIONS Immediate graft patency after MIDCAB is acceptable, and comparable with conventional CAB data, although meaningful comparison is difficult. The significance of early angiographic findings and the role for early angiography remain to be defined.

[1]  I. Gill,et al.  Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass: a series with early qualitative angiographic follow-up. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  D. Pennington,et al.  Bypass grafts to the left anterior descending coronary artery: saphenous vein versus internal mammary artery. , 1980, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  J. Stark How to choose a cardiac surgeon , 1996 .

[4]  A. Barsotti,et al.  Left anterior descending coronary artery grafting via left anterior small thoracotomy without cardiopulmonary bypass. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  T. Ivert,et al.  Angiographic studies of internal mammary artery grafts 11 years after coronary artery bypass grafting. , 1988, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[6]  A. Baue,et al.  Early and lage results of coronary revascularization with saphenous vein and internal mammary artery grafts. , 1979, American journal of surgery.

[7]  J. Busby,et al.  Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery: really minimal? , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[8]  H. Barner,et al.  Patency of internal mammary-coronary grafts. , 1976, Circulation.

[9]  M. Bourassa,et al.  Comparison of late changes in internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts in two consecutive series of patients 10 years after operation. , 1984, Circulation.

[10]  W J Keon,et al.  Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  D. Ullyot,et al.  Minimally invasive coronary bypass: a dissenting opinion. , 1998, Circulation.

[12]  W. R. Chitwood,et al.  Intraoperative catheterization of the left internal mammary artery via the left radial artery. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  V. Subramanian Less invasive arterial CABG on a beating heart. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  W. Daniel,et al.  Minimally invasive coronary-artery bypass surgery. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.