Categorical versus dimensional approaches to diagnosis: methodological challenges.

The arguments pitting categorical versus dimensional approaches to psychiatric diagnosis have been long ongoing with little sign of imminent resolution. We argue that categorical and dimensional approaches are fundamentally equivalent, but that one or other approach is more appropriate depending on the clinical circumstances and research questions being addressed. This paper aims to demonstrate (a) how these two approaches necessarily interdigitate, (b) to clarify the conditions under which one should utilize one approach over the other, and (c) to alert psychiatric clinicians and researchers to issues in the methodology literature that might facilitate their considerations. Using an example from the Infant Health and Development Program (IHDP), we illustrate the importance of using dimensional approaches for hypothesis testing, identify the problems with power and with interpretation that arise from employing a categorical approach, and underscore the importance of identifying the appropriate cutpoints when a categorical approach is necessitated. We argue that failure to utilize the correct approach under the appropriate circumstances can result in impaired clinical and research decision-making.

[1]  H. Veiel Base-rates, cut-points and interaction effects: the problem with dichotomized continuous variables , 1988, Psychological Medicine.

[2]  H. Kraemer,et al.  Random assignment in clinical trials: issues in planning (Infant Health and Development Program). , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[3]  D. Spiker,et al.  Helping low birth weight, premature babies : the infant health and development program , 1997 .

[4]  H. Kraemer,et al.  Which Alzheimer Patients Are at Risk for Rapid Cognitive Decline? , 2002, Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology.

[5]  A Donner,et al.  Statistical implications of the choice between a dichotomous or continuous trait in studies of interobserver agreement. , 1994, Biometrics.

[6]  L. Robins,et al.  The Validity of psychiatric diagnosis , 1989 .

[7]  D J Kupfer,et al.  Conceptualization and rationale for consensus definitions of terms in major depressive disorder. Remission, recovery, relapse, and recurrence. , 1991, Archives of general psychiatry.

[8]  T. Treat,et al.  Quantifying the information value of clinical assessments with signal detection theory. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[10]  E. Keeler,et al.  Primer on certain elements of medical decision making. , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Jacob Cohen The Cost of Dichotomization , 1983 .

[12]  Helena Chmura Kraemer,et al.  Evaluating Medical Tests: Objective and Quantitative Guidelines , 1992 .

[13]  M. Hamilton A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION , 1960, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[14]  L. Koran,et al.  The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments (second of two parts). , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.