Novel Methods to Enhance Precision and Reliability in Muscle Synergy Identification during Walking

Muscle synergies are hypothesized to reflect modular control of muscle groups via descending commands sent through multiple neural pathways. Recently, the number of synergies has been reported as a functionally relevant indicator of motor control complexity in individuals with neurological movement disorders. Yet the number of synergies extracted during a given activity, e.g., gait, varies within and across studies, even for unimpaired individuals. With no standardized methods for precise determination, this variability remains unexplained making comparisons across studies and cohorts difficult. Here, we utilize k-means clustering and intra-class and between-level correlation coefficients to precisely discriminate reliable from unreliable synergies. Electromyography (EMG) was recorded bilaterally from eight leg muscles during treadmill walking at self-selected speed. Muscle synergies were extracted from 20 consecutive gait cycles using non-negative matrix factorization. We demonstrate that the number of synergies is highly dependent on the threshold when using the variance accounted for by reconstructed EMG. Beyond use of threshold, our method utilized a quantitative metric to reliably identify four or five synergies underpinning walking in unimpaired adults and revealed synergies having poor reproducibility that should not be considered as true synergies. We show that robust and unreliable synergies emerge similarly, emphasizing the need for careful analysis in those with pathology.

[1]  Simon M. Danner,et al.  Human spinal locomotor control is based on flexibly organized burst generators. , 2015, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  Timothy A. Machado,et al.  Primacy of Flexor Locomotor Pattern Revealed by Ancestral Reversion of Motor Neuron Identity , 2015, Cell.

[3]  Andrea d'Avella,et al.  Matrix factorization algorithms for the identification of muscle synergies: evaluation on simulated and experimental data sets. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  The influence of merged muscle excitation modules on post-stroke hemiparetic walking performance. , 2013, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  Lena H Ting,et al.  Task-level feedback can explain temporal recruitment of spatially fixed muscle synergies throughout postural perturbations. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Dario Farina,et al.  Extracting Signals Robust to Electrode Number and Shift for Online Simultaneous and Proportional Myoelectric Control by Factorization Algorithms , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  D. Winter,et al.  EMG profiles during normal human walking: stride-to-stride and inter-subject variability. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  Emilio Bizzi,et al.  Representation of Muscle Synergies in the Primate Brain , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Muscle synergies and complexity of neuromuscular control during gait in cerebral palsy , 2015, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[10]  Sylvain Dorel,et al.  Smoothing of electromyographic signals can influence the number of extracted muscle synergies , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  Emilio Bizzi,et al.  Adjustments of motor pattern for load compensation via modulated activations of muscle synergies during natural behaviors. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Five basic muscle activation patterns account for muscle activity during human locomotion , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  Benjamin J. Fregly,et al.  Persons with Parkinson’s disease exhibit decreased neuromuscular complexity during gait , 2013, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  Emilio Bizzi,et al.  The neural origin of muscle synergies , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[15]  Lena H Ting,et al.  Long-term Training Modifies the Modular Structure and Organization of Walking , 2015 .

[16]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  Merging of healthy motor modules predicts reduced locomotor performance and muscle coordination complexity post-stroke. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization , 1999, Nature.

[18]  A. d’Avella,et al.  Locomotor Primitives in Newborn Babies and Their Development , 2011, Science.

[19]  Kyung Koh,et al.  Deficits in motor abilities for multi-finger force control in hemiparetic stroke survivors , 2016, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Francesco Lacquaniti,et al.  Motor Control Programs and Walking , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[21]  Jae Kun Shim,et al.  Cutaneous sensory feedback plays a critical role in agonist–antagonist co-activation , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  D. Kerrigan,et al.  Rectus femoris: its role in normal gait. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  Steven A. Kautz,et al.  Evaluation of Abnormal Synergy Patterns Poststroke: Relationship of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment to Hemiparetic Locomotion , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[24]  Dario Farina,et al.  Impulses of activation but not motor modules are preserved in the locomotion of subacute stroke patients. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  John Guckenheimer,et al.  Synaptic patterning of left-right alternation in a computational model of the rodent hindlimb central pattern generator , 2011, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[26]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Central and Sensory Contributions to the Activation and Organization of Muscle Synergies during Natural Motor Behaviors , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Yee Lee Shing,et al.  Within-person trial-to-trial variability precedes and predicts cognitive decline in old and very old age: Longitudinal data from the Berlin Aging Study , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  F Lacquaniti,et al.  Muscle activation patterns are bilaterally linked during split-belt treadmill walking in humans. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Jeffrey P. Gill,et al.  Motor neuronal activity varies least among individuals when it matters most for behavior. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Dario Farina,et al.  Motor modules of human locomotion: influence of EMG averaging, concatenation, and number of step cycles , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[31]  Matthew C. Tresch,et al.  The number and choice of muscles impact the results of muscle synergy analyses , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[32]  Jessica L. Allen,et al.  Neuromechanical Principles Underlying Movement Modularity and Their Implications for Rehabilitation , 2015, Neuron.

[33]  François Hug,et al.  Can muscle coordination be precisely studied by surface electromyography? , 2011, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[34]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Major role for sensory feedback in soleus EMG activity in the stance phase of walking in man , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[35]  Stacie A. Chvatal,et al.  Voluntary and Reactive Recruitment of Locomotor Muscle Synergies during Perturbed Walking , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Emilio Bizzi,et al.  Combinations of muscle synergies in the construction of a natural motor behavior , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.