Creative contests: knowledge generation and underlying learning dynamics for idea generation

ABSTRACT Due to the heterogeneous nature of the crowd in online crowdsourcing, one key question discussed by academics and practitioners is whether participants are skilled enough to make valuable contributions. This research studies learning processes underlying idea generation in creative contests. Based on qualitative findings triangulating participants’ and brands’ perspectives, we identify six incoming and outgoing user skills which contribute to the development of valuable contributions and determine participation in future contests. Building on three types of brand instructions which emerge from the data, findings show how value is added by the collectivity and two complementary dynamics: (1) social learning and (2) learning from experience. From a managerial perspective, results provide guidance in designing successful crowdsourcing competitions by taking benefit from a multi-competent crowd.

[1]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Crowdsourcing As a Solution to Distant Search , 2012 .

[2]  Johann Füller,et al.  A Comparison of Creative Behaviours in Online Communities Across Cultures , 2011 .

[3]  Fred H. Siller Thinking Inside the Box : Why Consumers Enjoy Constrained Creative Experiences , 2007 .

[4]  James Surowiecki The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations Doubleday Books. , 2004 .

[5]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[6]  Yi Xu,et al.  Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Richard C. Becherer,et al.  The Impact of Instruction Understanding on Satisfaction and Switching Intentions , 2003 .

[9]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency , 2024, Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo.

[10]  Karim R Lakhani,et al.  Using the crowd as an innovation partner. , 2013, Harvard business review.

[11]  Kathy Ellem Doing Qualitative Research in Social Work , 2015 .

[12]  Tuomas Ahola,et al.  A network perspective on idea and innovation crowdsourcing in industrial firms , 2014 .

[13]  Eric Schenk,et al.  Towards a characterization of crowdsourcing practices , 2011 .

[14]  Christian Grönroos,et al.  Conceptualising value co-creation: A journey to the 1970s and back to the future , 2012 .

[15]  FüllerJohann,et al.  Community based innovation , 2006 .

[16]  Jagdip Singh,et al.  Pragmatic Learning Theory: An Inquiry-Action Framework for Distributed Consumer Learning in Online Communities , 2010 .

[17]  Thomas S. Wurster,et al.  Blown to Bits: How the New Economics of Information Transforms Strategy , 1999 .

[18]  Daren C. Brabham,et al.  Recruiting Individuals to a Crowdsourcing Community: Applying Motivational Categories to an Ad Copy Test , 2015 .

[19]  J. Füller,et al.  The dark and the bright side of co-creation: Triggers of member behavior in online innovation communities , 2013 .

[20]  A. Bandura,et al.  Social learning and personality development , 1964 .

[21]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[22]  A. Bullinger,et al.  Community-Based Innovation Contests: Where Competition Meets Cooperation , 2010 .

[23]  Mitzi M. Montoya,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Creativity in Product Innovation Teams , 2013 .

[24]  Kimmy Wa Chan,et al.  Fostering Customer Ideation in Crowdsourcing Community: The Role of Peer-to-peer and Peer-to-firm Interactions , 2015 .

[25]  Dominik Walcher,et al.  Toolkits for Idea Competitions: A Novel Method to Integrate Users in New Product Development , 2006 .

[26]  Kirsimarja Blomqvist,et al.  MY IDEA IS OUR IDEA! SUPPORTING USER-DRIVEN INNOVATION ACTIVITIES IN CROWDSOURCING COMMUNITIES , 2013 .

[27]  Tore Nilssen,et al.  Learning by doing in contests , 2010 .

[28]  Daren C. Brabham THE MYTH OF AMATEUR CROWDS , 2012 .

[29]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace , 1993 .

[30]  Michael Vitale,et al.  The Wisdom of Crowds , 2015, Cell.

[31]  Fernando González-Ladrón-de-Guevara,et al.  Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition , 2012, J. Inf. Sci..

[32]  Matthias Sutter,et al.  Social Learning in Beauty-Contest Games , 2014 .

[33]  Tommy Høyvarde Clausen,et al.  The role of institutional arbitrage in the search for product innovation: Firm level evidence from Norway , 2014 .

[34]  H. Simon,et al.  The Processes of Creative Thinking , 1959 .

[35]  A. Edmondson,et al.  METHODOLOGICAL FIT IN MANAGEMENT FIELD RESEARCH. , 2007 .

[36]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[37]  Olivier Toubia,et al.  Improving Online Idea Generation Platforms and Customizing the Task Structure on the Basis of Consumers' Domain-Specific Knowledge , 2015 .

[38]  K. Ruyter,et al.  Social Capital Production in a Virtual P3 Community , 2008 .

[39]  S. Baron,et al.  How customers ‘learn’ to work for retailers , 2015 .

[40]  R. Kozinets,et al.  The Wisdom of Consumer Crowds , 2008 .

[41]  Dahui Li,et al.  Task Design, Motivation, and Participation in Crowdsourcing Contests , 2011, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[42]  R. Morgan,et al.  Customer and competitor insights, new product development competence, and new product creativity: differential, integrative, and substitution effects , 2015 .

[43]  Risto Rajala,et al.  From Idea Crowdsourcing to Managing User Knowledge , 2013 .

[44]  S. Harvey Creative Synthesis: Exploring the Process of Extraordinary Group Creativity , 2014 .

[45]  Christoph Fuchs,et al.  Customer Empowerment in New Product Development , 2011 .

[46]  Anna Fyrberg Yngfalk ‘It’s not us, it’s them!’– Rethinking value co-creation among multiple actors , 2013 .

[47]  N. Nummela,et al.  Intercultural competences and interaction schemes — Four forces regulating dyadic encounters in international business , 2015 .

[48]  Ann Højbjerg Clarke,et al.  Knowledge sharing in heterogeneous teams through collaboration and cooperation: Exemplified through Public–Private-Innovation partnerships , 2014 .

[49]  Jingjiang Liu,et al.  Innovation Performance in New Product Development Teams in China's Technology Ventures: The Role of Behavioral Integration Dimensions and Collective Efficacy , 2013 .

[50]  Jaihak Chung,et al.  How Do Interaction Activities among Customers and between Customers and Firms Influence Market Performance and Continuous Product Innovation? An Empirical Investigation of the Mobile Application Market , 2015 .

[51]  Daren C. Brabham MOVING THE CROWD AT THREADLESS , 2010 .

[52]  J. Füller Refining Virtual Co-Creation from a Consumer Perspective , 2010 .

[53]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Idea Generation and the Quality of the Best Idea , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[54]  Param Vir Singh,et al.  Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas Under Consumer Learning , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[55]  Daren C. Brabham Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: Leveraging the collective intelligence of online communities for public good , 2010 .

[56]  Kathrin M. Möslein,et al.  Innovation Contests - Where are we? , 2010, AMCIS.

[57]  Souad Djelassi,et al.  Customers' participation in product development through crowdsourcing: Issues and implications , 2013 .

[58]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  Communitition: The Tension between Competition and Collaboration in Community-Based Design Contests , 2011 .

[59]  E. Schwarz,et al.  Everybody Is Invited but not Everybody Will Come — The Influence of Personality Dispositions on Users’ Entry Decisions for Crowdsourcing Competitions , 2016, Managing Innovation.

[60]  Martin Schreier,et al.  The Value of Crowdsourcing: Can Users Really Compete with Professionals in Generating New Product Ideas? , 2009 .

[61]  W. Powell Learning from Collaboration: Knowledge and Networks in the Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries , 1998 .

[62]  Anthonius J.M. de Jong,et al.  Types and qualities of knowledge , 1993 .

[63]  Bill Tomlinson,et al.  Who are the Turkers? Worker Demographics in Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2009 .

[64]  Barry L. Bayus,et al.  Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[65]  David J. Silverman,et al.  Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook , 1999 .

[66]  I. Shaw,et al.  Doing Qualitative Research in Social Work , 2014 .

[67]  Marian Garcia Martinez Solver engagement in knowledge sharing in crowdsourcing communities: Exploring the link to creativity , 2015 .

[68]  Christian Lüthje,et al.  Whom Should Firms Attract to Open Innovation Platforms? The Role of Knowledge Diversity and Motivation , 2011 .

[69]  J. Teasdale Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change? , 1978 .

[70]  Philip T. Roundy,et al.  Qualitative data: Cooking without a recipe , 2012 .

[71]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  Walking the tight rope of coopetition: Impact of competition and cooperation intensities and balance on firm innovation performance , 2014 .

[72]  Kirsimarja Blomqvist,et al.  User Motivation And Knowledge Sharing In Idea Crowdsourcing , 2014 .

[73]  M. Sawhney,et al.  Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation , 2005 .

[74]  Daren C. Brabham Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects , 2009 .