Price competition and technology licensing in a dynamic duopoly

Abstract Decisions regarding product innovations are inherently dynamic because for consumers to perceive constant improvement in product innovation, innovation must be current and continuously updated. Moreover, firms’ price and innovation decisions interact over time, adding to their dynamic nature. In this study, we examine price and innovation decisions in a dynamic duopoly of an innovating firm and a non-innovating firm. The innovating firm competes with the non-innovating firm on price and determines the innovation level that improves its consumers’ product valuation. The non-innovating firm lacks the technology to innovate but can obtain innovation by licensing. Consumer perceptions of product innovations evolve over time. In our study, we derive and characterize firms’ subgame-perfect Nash equilibrium decisions and profits. Additionally, we analyze the effects of technology licensing on firms’ instantaneous and steady-state equilibrium behaviors and on consumer perceptions of innovation. The analysis shows that firms’ myopia leads to a low innovation level and severe price competition, thereby reducing firm profits. Licensing is effective in mitigating the intensity of price competition and is beneficial for the innovating firm but not always for the non-innovating firm. Consumer perceptions of product similarity and capability to utilize technology stimulate the non-innovating firm to accept licensing.

[1]  R. Garud,et al.  Changing competitive dynamics in network industries: An exploration of sun microsystems' open systems strategy , 1993 .

[2]  Munirul H. Nabin,et al.  Licensing under Vertical Product Differentiation: Price vs. Quantity Competition , 2014 .

[3]  Ashish Arora,et al.  Patent Protection, Complementary Assets, and Firms' Incentives for Technology Licensing , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[4]  A. Velasco,et al.  Banks, debt maturity and financial crises , 2000 .

[5]  Boleslaw Tolwinski,et al.  Technology sharing cartels and industrial structure , 1997 .

[6]  Fouad El Ouardighi,et al.  Quality improvement and goodwill accumulation in a dynamic duopoly , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Yang Liu,et al.  Prisoner’s dilemma on behavioral choices in the presence of sticky prices: Farsightedness vs. myopia , 2017 .

[8]  Jay Pil Choi,et al.  Cooperative R&D with product market competition , 1993 .

[9]  M. Farhana,et al.  Design Driven Innovation as a Differentiation Strategy: in the Context of Automotive Industry , 2015 .

[10]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Quantity and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with technology licensing , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Luca Lambertini,et al.  Dynamic Oligopoly with Sticky Prices: Closed-Loop, Feedback, and Open-Loop Solutions , 2004 .

[12]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Boiling Frogs: Pricing Strategies for a Manufacturer Adding a Direct Channel that Competes with the Traditional Channel , 2006 .

[13]  Lihui Lin,et al.  Impact of Licensing on Investment and Financing of Technology Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Heiner Evanschitzky,et al.  Success Factors of Product Innovation: An Updated Meta‐Analysis , 2012 .

[15]  Gerard J. Tellis,et al.  Make, Buy, or Ally? Choice of and Payoff from Announcements of Alternate Strategies for Innovations , 2014, Mark. Sci..

[16]  Mark E. Ferguson,et al.  The Effect of Competition on Recovery Strategies , 2006 .

[17]  Minghe Sun,et al.  A differential oligopoly game for optimal production planning and water savings , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Remanufacturing as a Marketing Strategy , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[19]  Giorgos Stamatopoulos,et al.  Licensing under general demand and cost functions , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  C. Shapiro,et al.  R&D Rivalry with Licensing or Imitation , 1987 .

[21]  Baohong Sun,et al.  Product Strategy for Innovators in Markets with Network Effects , 2004 .

[22]  Liming Liu,et al.  Dynamic Competitive Newsvendors with Service-Sensitive Demands , 2007, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[23]  Urbancová Hana Competitive Advantage Achievement through Innovation and Knowledge , 2013 .

[24]  Luca Lambertini,et al.  A differential oligopoly game with differentiated goods and sticky prices , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Peter M. Kort,et al.  Autonomous and advertising-dependent 'word of mouth' under costly dynamic pricing , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Georges Zaccour,et al.  Capacity investments in a stochastic dynamic game: Equilibrium characterization , 2013, Oper. Res. Lett..

[27]  Fernando Hervas Soriano,et al.  The 2015 EU Survey on Industrial R&D Investment Trends , 2015 .

[28]  Raghu Garud,et al.  CHARGING COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS IN NETWORK INDUSTRIES: AN EXPLORATION OF SUM MICROSYSTEMS' OPEN , 1993 .

[29]  Claudio A. Piga,et al.  Competition in a duopoly with sticky price and advertising , 2000 .

[30]  Saeed M. Z. A. Tarabieh,et al.  GAINING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE THROUGH CUSTOMER ORIENTATION, INNOVATION DIFFERENTIATION AND MARKET DIFFERENTIATION , 2011 .

[31]  Xiaojun Pan,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics Dynamic optimal control of process – product innovation with learning by doing , 2015 .

[32]  Chaim Fershtman,et al.  Patents, Imitation and Licensing in an Asymmetric Dynamic R&D Race , 2006 .

[33]  Suresh P. Sethi,et al.  Optimal Pricing and Advertising in a Durable-Good Duopoly , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  Rainer Schlosser Stochastic Dynamic Pricing and Advertising in Isoelastic Oligopoly Models , 2015 .

[35]  Yuri Levin,et al.  Dynamic Pricing in the Presence of Strategic Consumers and Oligopolistic Competition , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[36]  Raymond De Bondt,et al.  Spillovers and innovative activities , 1997 .

[37]  Emeric Henry,et al.  Competition and the Efficiency of Markets for Technology , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[38]  C. Fershtman,et al.  Dynamic Duopolistic Competition with Sticky Prices , 1987 .

[39]  Bert De Reyck,et al.  Step by Step: The Benefits of Stage-based R&D Licensing Contracts , 2014 .

[40]  Hubert Pun,et al.  The value of partnership under competition: When competitors may be R&D joint-venture and supply-chain partners for a critical component , 2016 .

[41]  Keith E. Maskus,et al.  Intellectual property rights, licensing, and innovation in an endogenous product-cycle model , 2001 .

[42]  Aniruddha Bagchi,et al.  Technology licensing in a differentiated oligopoly , 2014 .