Time Pressure, Time Saving And Online Shopping: Exploring A Contradiction

Previous survey research revealed that consumers perceived online shopping and buying to be a time saving practice. Paradoxically, they only rarely reported using that tactic to save time, introducing a contradiction. Focus group research and unstructured interviews among active, time-pressured consumers provide partial solutions to the puzzle. Two types of online shopping benefits appeal to two types of consumers: Those experiencing situational time pressure respond well to "time-saving" appeals. Another, larger proportion, whose personal inclinations or personality traits result in time pressure are more interested in doing more tasks quickly or engaging in polychronic activities. These findings suggest online merchants simultaneously promote both time-saving and quicker accomplishment of more tasks. Though they are two sides of the same coin, time-pressured consumers tend to see only one side or the other. Both types of time-pressured shoppers eschew Websites requiring substantial "up-front" investment of time; complex, multi-option initial or home pages, and early insistence for "registration" that requires revealing personal information. This suggests clean, clear, uncluttered introductory pages and delay in urging registration until rapport has been established. Inexpensive, rapid delivery times and liberal return privileges were also highly valued by all time-pressured participants. Cost restrictions limit the degree to which online merchants can accommodate these preferences.

[1]  Amanda J. Broderick,et al.  The application of physiological observation methods to emotion research , 2007 .

[2]  Tracy L. Tuten,et al.  Personality determinants of online shopping : Explaining online purchase intentions using a hierarchical approach , 2007 .

[3]  Jianhua Shao,et al.  Privacy and e-commerce: a consumer-centric perspective , 2007, Electron. Commer. Res..

[4]  Elliot Rabinovich,et al.  Managing Internet Product Returns: A Focus on Effective Service Operations , 2007, Decis. Sci..

[5]  Glenn I. Roisman,et al.  The Adult Attachment Interview and self-reports of attachment style: an empirical rapprochement. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  S. Richbell,et al.  Night shoppers in the “open 24 hours” supermarket: a profile , 2007 .

[7]  Lina Zhou,et al.  ONLINE SHOPPING ACCEPTANCE MODEL — A CRITICAL SURVEY OF CONSUMER FACTORS IN ONLINE SHOPPING , 2007 .

[8]  Jae-Hyeon Ahn,et al.  Management of trust in the e-marketplace: the role of the buyer's experience in building trust , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[9]  Carol C. Bienstock,et al.  How do customers judge quality in an e-tailer? , 2006 .

[10]  Karl Reiner Lang,et al.  Consumer Search Behavior in Online Shopping Environments , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  Nina Koiso-Kanttila,et al.  Time, attention, authenticity and consumer benefits of the Web , 2005 .

[12]  June Cotte,et al.  The Times of Their Lives: Phenomenological and Metaphorical Characteristics of Consumer Timestyles , 2004 .

[13]  Carol Kaufman-Scarborough,et al.  Polychronic tendency analysis: a new approach to understanding women's shopping behaviors , 2004 .

[14]  Pamela L. Alreck,et al.  The hurried consumer: Time-saving perceptions of Internet and catalogue shopping , 2002 .

[15]  Stacy L. Wood Remote Purchase Environments: The Influence of Return Policy Leniency on Two-Stage Decision Processes , 2001 .

[16]  Margaret Mietus Sanik,et al.  The effects of time allocation on parental stress , 1993 .

[17]  M. Lavin Wives’ employment, time pressure, and mail/phone order shopping: An exploratory study , 1993 .

[18]  Brent Baum Open 24 Hours , 1989 .