Electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation: the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction by morphologic analysis of the ST segment.

UNLABELLED Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of many causes of ST-segment elevation (STE) in emergency department (ED) chest pain (CP) patients. The morphology of STE may assist in the correct determination of its cause, with concave patterns in non-AMI syndromes and non-concave waveforms in AMI. OBJECTIVES To determine the impact of STE morphologic analysis on AMI diagnosis and the ability of this technique to separate AMI from non-infarction causes of STE. METHODS The electrocardiograms (ECGs) of consecutive ED adult CP patients (with three serial troponin I determinations) were interpreted in two-step fashion by six attending emergency physicians (EPs): 1) the determination of STE by three EPs followed by 2) STE morphologic analysis (either concave or non-concave) in those patients with STE. The impact of STE morphology analysis was investigated in the identification of AMI and non-AMI causes of STE. Acute myocardial infarction was diagnosed by abnormal serum troponin I values (>0.1 mg/dL) followed by a rise and fall of the serum marker; STE diagnoses of non-AMI causes were determined by medical record review. Interobserver reliability concerning STE morphology was determined. Study inclusion criteria included at least three troponin values performed in serial fashion no more frequently than every three hours, initial ED ECG, ED diagnosis, and final hospital diagnosis. RESULTS Five hundred ninety-nine CP patients were entered in the study, with 171 (29%) individuals having STE on their ECGs. Of the 171 patients who had STE, 56 had AMI, 50 had unstable angina pectoris (USAP), and 65 had non-coronary final diagnoses. Forty-nine patients had non-concave STE, 46 with AMI and three with USAP; no patient with a non-coronary diagnosis had a non-concave STE morphology. The sensitivity and specificity of the non-concave STE morphology for AMI diagnoses were 77% and 97%, respectively; the positive and negative predictive values for non-concave morphology in AMI diagnoses were 94% and 88%, respectively. Interobserver reliability in the STE morphology determination revealed a kappa coefficient of 0.87. CONCLUSIONS A non-concave STE morphology is frequently encountered in AMI patients. While the sensitivity of this pattern for AMI diagnosis is not particularly helpful, the presence of this finding in adult ED chest pain patients with STE strongly suggests AMI. This technique produces consistent results among these EPs.

[1]  Hugo A. Katus,et al.  Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. , 2000, European heart journal.

[2]  Frans Van de Werf,et al.  An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  M W Krucoff,et al.  Multilead ST-segment monitoring in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a consensus statement for healthcare professionals. ST- Segment Monitoring Practice Guideline International Working Group. , 1999, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[4]  F. Fesmire,et al.  ECG diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block in patients undergoing continuous ECG monitoring. , 1995, Annals of emergency medicine.

[5]  G. Wagner,et al.  Early electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the presence of ventricular paced rhythm. GUSTO-I investigators. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  B. Drew,et al.  12-lead ST-segment monitoring vs single-lead maximum ST-segment monitoring for detecting ongoing ischemia in patients with unstable coronary syndromes. , 1998, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[7]  P. Kligfield,et al.  Relationship of prior myocardial infarction to false-positive electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute injury in patients with chest pain. , 1987, Archives of internal medicine.

[8]  L. Wallentin,et al.  ST-segment monitoring with continuous 12-lead ECG improves early risk stratification in patients with chest pain and ECG nondiagnostic of acute myocardial infarction. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  L. Goldman,et al.  Candidates for thrombolysis among emergency room patients with acute chest pain. Potential true- and false-positive rates. , 1989, Annals of internal medicine.

[10]  F. Fesmire,et al.  Instability of ST segments in the early stages of acute myocardial infarction in patients undergoing continuous 12-lead ECG monitoring. , 1995, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[11]  R. Califf,et al.  Mortality Within 24 Hours of Thrombolysis for Myocardial Infarction: The Importance of Early Reperfusion , 1994, Circulation.

[12]  E. Topol,et al.  Selection of patients with acute myocardial infarction for thrombolytic therapy. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[13]  G S Wagner,et al.  Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Investigators. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  R Roberts,et al.  Electrocardiographic and clinical criteria for recognition of acute myocardial infarction based on analysis of 3,697 patients. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  T. Aufderheide,et al.  Evaluation of ST segment elevation criteria for the prehospital electrocardiographic diagnosis fo acute myocardial infarction. , 1994, Annals of emergency medicine.

[16]  O. Tochikubo,et al.  Value of ST-segment elevation pattern in predicting infarct size and left ventricular function at discharge in patients with reperfused acute anterior myocardial infarction. , 1999, American heart journal.

[17]  T. Aufderheide,et al.  Cause of ST segment abnormality in ED chest pain patients. , 2001, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[18]  F. Fesmire Which chest pain patients potentially benefit from continuous 12-lead ST-segment monitoring with automated serial ECG? , 2000, The American journal of emergency medicine.