Exploring the evolution of a trade-off between vigilance and foraging in group-living organisms

Even though grouping behaviour has been actively studied for over a century, the relative importance of the numerous proposed fitness benefits of grouping remain unclear. We use a digital model of evolving prey under simulated predation to directly explore the evolution of gregarious foraging behaviour according to one such benefit, the ‘many eyes’ hypothesis. According to this hypothesis, collective vigilance allows prey in large groups to detect predators more efficiently by making alarm signals or behavioural cues to each other, thereby allowing individuals within the group to spend more time foraging. Here, we find that collective vigilance is sufficient to select for gregarious foraging behaviour as long there is not a direct cost for grouping (e.g. competition for limited food resources), even when controlling for confounding factors such as the dilution effect. Furthermore, we explore the role of the genetic relatedness and reproductive strategy of the prey and find that highly related groups of prey with a semelparous reproductive strategy are the most likely to evolve gregarious foraging behaviour mediated by the benefit of vigilance. These findings, combined with earlier studies with evolving digital organisms, further sharpen our understanding of the factors favouring grouping behaviour.

[1]  Randal S. Olson,et al.  Critical interplay between density-dependent predation and evolution of the selfish herd , 2013, GECCO '13.

[2]  Kartik Shanker,et al.  Why do birds participate in mixed-species foraging flocks? A large-scale synthesis , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  Hanna Kokko,et al.  The tragedy of the commons in evolutionary biology. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  W. Foster,et al.  Group size and anti-predator strategies in a marine insect , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  Steven Hamblin,et al.  Genetic algorithms and non-ESS solutions to game theory models , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  A. Houston,et al.  Capital breeding and income breeding: their meaning, measurement, and worth. , 2009, Ecology.

[7]  Christoph Adami Boldly Going Beyond Mathematics , 2012, Science.

[8]  StevenHamblin,et al.  On the practical usage of genetic algorithms in ecology and evolution , 2013 .

[9]  Michel Treisman,et al.  Predation and the evolution of gregariousness. II. An economic model for predator-prey interaction , 1975, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  Randal S. Olson,et al.  Exploring Conditions That Select for the Evolution of Cooperative Group Foraging , 2014 .

[11]  D. Krakauer Groups confuse predators by exploiting perceptual bottlenecks: a connectionist model of the confusion effect , 1995, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[12]  Arend Hintze,et al.  Integrated Information Increases with Fitness in the Evolution of Animats , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  M. Whittingham,et al.  Good foragers can also be good at detecting predators , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  David B. Knoester,et al.  The Evolution of Division of Labor , 2009, ECAL.

[15]  B. Bertram,et al.  Vigilance and group size in ostriches , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  Arend Hintze,et al.  Predator confusion is sufficient to evolve swarming behaviour , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[17]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  The contingencies of group size and vigilance , 2007 .

[18]  E. Fernández-Juricic,et al.  The visual fields of two ground-foraging birds, House Finches and House Sparrows, allow for simultaneous foraging and anti-predator vigilance , 2008 .

[19]  C. Hemelrijk,et al.  On prey grouping an predator confusion in artificial fish schools , 2006 .

[20]  Arend Hintze,et al.  Risk sensitivity as an evolutionary adaptation , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[21]  L. Munari How the body shapes the way we think — a new view of intelligence , 2009 .

[22]  W. Foster,et al.  Evidence for the dilution effect in the selfish herd from fish predation on a marine insect , 1981, Nature.

[23]  A. W. F. Edwards,et al.  The statistical processes of evolutionary theory , 1963 .

[24]  I. Couzin Collective cognition in animal groups , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  G. Beauchamp What is the magnitude of the group-size effect on vigilance? , 2008 .

[26]  Thomas Caraco,et al.  Time Budgeting and Group Size: A Test of Theory , 1979 .

[27]  G. Beauchamp,et al.  False alarms and the evolution of antipredator vigilance , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  M. Feldman,et al.  Evolution of learned strategy choice in a frequency-dependent game , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  Graeme D Ruxton,et al.  The application of genetic algorithms in behavioural ecology, illustrated with a model of anti-predator vigilance. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[30]  J. W. Wekesa,et al.  Effect of body size on swarming behavior and mating success of maleAnopheles freeborni (Diptera: Culicidae) , 1993, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[31]  W. Foster,et al.  Group transmission of predator avoidance behaviour in a marine insect: The trafalgar effect , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  Jens Krause,et al.  The confusion effect—from neural networks to reduced predation risk , 2008 .

[33]  M. Elgar,et al.  PREDATOR VIGILANCE AND GROUP SIZE IN MAMMALS AND BIRDS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE , 1989, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[34]  Guy Beauchamp,et al.  Group-size effects on vigilance: a search for mechanisms , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[35]  R. Tollrian,et al.  Prey swarming: which predators become confused and why? , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[37]  J. Krebs,et al.  Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach , 1978 .

[38]  J. Lind,et al.  Vigilance benefits and competition costs in groups: do individual redshanks gain an overall foraging benefit? , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[39]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  On prey grouping and predator confusion in artifical fish schools , 2006 .

[40]  I. Couzin,et al.  Predatory Fish Select for Coordinated Collective Motion in Virtual Prey , 2012, Science.

[41]  F. Dobson,et al.  Mechanisms of the group-size effect on vigilance in Columbian ground squirrels: dilution versus detection , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  H. Pulliam,et al.  On the advantages of flocking. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[43]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Collective detection of predatory attack by social foragers: fraught with ambiguity? , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[44]  Pulliam Hr,et al.  On the advantages of flocking , 1973 .

[45]  T. Caraco,et al.  Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? , 1984 .

[46]  Randal S. Olson,et al.  Evolution of Swarming Behavior Is Shaped by How Predators Attack , 2013, Artificial Life.

[47]  George V. N. Powell,et al.  Experimental analysis of the social value of flocking by starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in relation to predation and foraging , 1974 .

[48]  P. Moran,et al.  The statistical processes of evolutionary theory. , 1963 .

[49]  A. Houston,et al.  Evolutionarily stable levels of vigilance as a function of group size , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  Eben Goodale,et al.  ALARM CALLING IN SRI LANKAN MIXED-SPECIES BIRD FLOCKS , 2005 .

[51]  A. E. Eiben,et al.  Introduction to Evolutionary Computing , 2003, Natural Computing Series.

[52]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[53]  G. Roberts Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[54]  John R. Krebs,et al.  Predation and group living , 1987 .

[55]  Thomas Caraco,et al.  The scanning behavior of juncos: A game-theoretical approach , 1982 .

[56]  C. Clark,et al.  The evolutionary advantages of group foraging , 1986 .

[57]  W. Hamilton Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[58]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Tragedy of the commons in Melipona bees , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[59]  P. Abrams Life History and the Relationship Between Food Availability and Foraging Effort , 1991 .

[60]  Michel Treisman,et al.  Predation and the evolution of gregariousness. I. Models for concealment and evasion , 1975, Animal Behaviour.

[61]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  Jens Krause,et al.  Influence of prey foraging posture on flight behavior and predation risk: predators take advantage of unwary prey , 1996 .

[63]  Robert E. Kenward,et al.  HAWKS AND DOVES: FACTORS AFFECTING SUCCESS AND SELECTION IN GOSHAWK ATTACKS ON WOODPIGEONS. , 1978 .

[64]  Arend Hintze,et al.  The Evolution of Representation in Simple Cognitive Networks , 2012, Neural Computation.

[65]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Back to the basics of antipredatory vigilance: can nonvigilant animals detect attack? , 1999, Animal Behaviour.