A Nonlinear Charge Controller With Tunable Precision for Highly Linear Operation of Piezoelectric Stack Actuators

Piezoelectric stack actuators, which have been widely used in precise positioning applications, suffer from the well-known hysteresis effect. Although numerous approaches such as sensor-based control and feedforward control have been proved to be effective, the resulting high cost and system complexity limit their use in industry. In this paper, the design and validation of a nonlinear charge controller (NCC) is presented for achieving highly linear operation of the actuator in a sensorless way, without modeling hysteretic nonlinearity. In the proposed scheme, the output voltage of traditional linear charge controller (LCC), which contains information of hysteresis, has been processed and utilized as feedback signals. As a result, controller outputs with tunable nonlinearity have been achieved, aiming to improve the observed overcompensation effect. Experimental results show that the dynamic tracking performance of the NCC is superior to LCC approach. The positioning error has been reduced to 0.4% of the travel range, corresponding to a nonlinearity reduction of 97%.

[1]  Karl Johan Åström,et al.  Design and Modeling of a High-Speed AFM-Scanner , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[2]  C. Newcomb,et al.  Improving the linearity of piezoelectric ceramic actuators , 1982 .

[3]  Q. Yang,et al.  A Monolithic Compliant Piezoelectric-Driven Microgripper: Design, Modeling, and Testing , 2013, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[4]  Y. Gourinat,et al.  Simultaneous compensation of hysteresis and creep in a single piezoelectric actuator by open-loop control for quasi-static space active optics applications , 2014 .

[5]  Hanz Richter,et al.  Modeling Nonlinear Behavior in a Piezoelectric Actuator , 2001 .

[6]  Tatsuo Arai,et al.  High-Speed Automated Manipulation of Microobjects Using a Two-Fingered Microhand , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[7]  Patrice Seers,et al.  Development of a simplified dynamic model for a piezoelectric injector using multiple injection strategies with biodiesel/diesel-fuel blends , 2014 .

[8]  N Hosseini,et al.  A monolithic MEMS position sensor for closed-loop high-speed atomic force microscopy. , 2016, Nanotechnology.

[9]  Santosh Devasia,et al.  Feedback-Linearized Inverse Feedforward for Creep, Hysteresis, and Vibration Compensation in AFM Piezoactuators , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[10]  A. Fleming Charge drive with active DC stabilization for linearization of piezoelectric hysteresis , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[11]  Tien-Fu Lu,et al.  Implementation and analysis of an innovative digital charge amplifier for hysteresis reduction in piezoelectric stack actuators. , 2014, The Review of scientific instruments.

[12]  Ping Ge,et al.  Tracking control of a piezoceramic actuator , 1996, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[13]  Srinivasa M. Salapaka,et al.  Design methodologies for robust nano-positioning , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[14]  Sergej Fatikow,et al.  Proxy-Based Sliding-Mode Tracking Control of Piezoelectric-Actuated Nanopositioning Stages , 2015, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[15]  Robert J. Veillette,et al.  A charge controller for linear operation of a piezoelectric stack actuator , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[16]  Qingsong Xu,et al.  Robust Impedance Control of a Compliant Microgripper for High-Speed Position/Force Regulation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[17]  T. Ando,et al.  High-speed atomic force microscopy for nano-visualization of dynamic biomolecular processes , 2008 .

[18]  Qingsong Xu,et al.  Rate-Dependent Hysteresis Modeling and Control of a Piezostage Using Online Support Vector Machine and Relevance Vector Machine , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[19]  Yu Ting Ma,et al.  Switched capacitor charge pump reduces hysteresis of piezoelectric actuators over a large frequency range. , 2010, The Review of scientific instruments.

[20]  Li-Min Zhu,et al.  Modeling and Compensation of Asymmetric Hysteresis Nonlinearity for Piezoceramic Actuators With a Modified Prandtl–Ishlinskii Model , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[21]  Qingsong Xu,et al.  Piezoelectric Nanopositioning Control Using Second-Order Discrete-Time Terminal Sliding-Mode Strategy , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[22]  Wei Zhu,et al.  Modeling and control of a two-axis fast steering mirror with piezoelectric stack actuators for laser beam tracking , 2015 .

[23]  K. Leang,et al.  Design and Control of a Three-Axis Serial-Kinematic High-Bandwidth Nanopositioner , 2012, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[24]  Andrew J Fleming,et al.  Quantitative scanning probe microscope topographies by charge linearization of the vertical actuator. , 2010, The Review of scientific instruments.

[25]  Anthony N. Sinclair,et al.  Development of a Piezoelectric Fuel Injector , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[26]  A. Fleming,et al.  A grounded-load charge amplifier for reducing hysteresis in piezoelectric tube scanners , 2005 .

[27]  H. Kaizuka,et al.  A Simple Way to Reduce Hysteresis and Creep When Using Piezoelectric Actuators , 1988 .

[28]  Sergej Fatikow,et al.  Modeling and Control of Piezo-Actuated Nanopositioning Stages: A Survey , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[29]  Andrew J. Fleming,et al.  Evaluation of charge drives for scanning probe microscope positioning stages , 2008, ACC.

[30]  Santosh Devasia,et al.  A Survey of Control Issues in Nanopositioning , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.