Supporting tough decisions in Norway: A healthcare system approach

Objectives: We describe, in general, the principles used in priority setting and, in particular, policy processes and decision making in Norway. Methods: A newly established council for setting priorities in health care is presented to illustrate how health technology assessments (HTAs) can support national advisors in complex priority-setting processes. Results and Conclusions: Setting priorities in health care is a complex task. Careful thinking is, therefore, required in determining the components of a system for priority-setting. Based on recent Norwegian experiences, we believe that the following generic parts may provide some of the solution: a common set of values; an organizational structure made up of key stakeholders; supporting mechanisms in the form of HTA organizations and documented best evidence; and loyalty to decisions by stakeholders responsible for implementing national policies.

[1]  Sosial og helsedepartementet.  NOU 1997: 18 , 1997 .

[2]  N. Daniels,et al.  Comprar Setting Limits Fairly Learning to share resources for health | Norman Daniels | 9780195325959 | Oxford University Press , 2008 .

[3]  C. Ham,et al.  Reasonable Rationing: international experience of priority setting in health care , 2003 .

[4]  The history of health technology assessment in Norway , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[5]  D. Banta,et al.  What is technology assessment? , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[6]  Harpreet S. Kohli,et al.  Health Technology Assessment and Health Policy-Making in Europe – Current Status, Challenges and Potential , 2010 .

[7]  Chris Ham,et al.  The 2009 budget and the NHS , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  Paul Aveyard,et al.  Effectiveness and safety of nicotine replacement therapy assisted reduction to stop smoking: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  O. Norheim,et al.  [High-cost medicine--do we lack open and legitimate procedures for prioritising?]. , 2009, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[10]  J. Kitzhaber.  Prioritising health services in an era of limits: the Oregon experience. , 1993, BMJ.

[11]  E. Jonsson,et al.  History of HTA: Introduction , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[12]  M. Drummond,et al.  Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions , 2008, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[13]  Karsten Vrangbæk,et al.  Nordic Health Care Systems: Recent Reforms and Current Policy Challenges , 2009 .

[14]  U. Winblad,et al.  Meeting Rising Public Expectations : The changing roles of patients/citizens , 2009 .

[15]  L. Bouter,et al.  The Use of Societal Criteria in Priority Setting for Health Technology Assessment in the Netherlands: Initial Experiences and Future Challenges , 1998, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[16]  N. Daniels,et al.  Setting Limits Fairly: Learning to Share Resources for Health , 2008 .

[17]  A. Tennant.  Priorities in health care: ethics, economy, implementation , 1996 .