Indicator Modelling and Interactive Visualisation for Urban Sustainability Assessment

This chapter presents a novel framework for the integration of the principles of sustainable development within the urban design processes. The framework recognises that decision making for sustainable urban planning is a challenging process: requiring an understanding of the complex interactions amongst environmental, economic, and social issues. Methodologies are required that would support non-experts to become more involved in the urban design process. Towards this, the authors develop an indicator modelling and visualisation tool which comprises 1) indicator selection, 2) modelling techniques that allow spatio-temporal prediction of indicators, 3) interactive 3D virtual world where visualisation techniques are used to present indicator information overlaying the virtual world to facilitate effective communication with a wide range of stakeholders. The sustainability modelling and 3D visualisations are shown to have the potential to enhance community engagement within the planning process, thus enhancing public acceptance and participation within the urban or rural development project.

[1]  T. Saaty Fundamentals of the analytic network process — Dependence and feedback in decision-making with a single network , 2004 .

[2]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics , 2003 .

[3]  Kheir Al-Kodmany,et al.  Visualization Tools and Methods in Community Planning: From Freehand Sketches to Virtual Reality , 2002 .

[4]  Suresh K. Lodha,et al.  Spatio-temporal visualization of urban crimes on a GIS grid , 2000, GIS '00.

[5]  Michelle Graymore,et al.  An Index of Regional Sustainability: A GIS-based multiple criteria analysis decision support system for progressing sustainability , 2009 .

[6]  Suzana Dragicevic,et al.  iCity: A GIS-CA modelling tool for urban planning and decision making , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[7]  Ruth E. Falconer,et al.  Enhancing urban sustainability using 3D visualisation , 2011 .

[8]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Sustainable energy futures: Methodological challenges in combining scenarios and participatory multi-criteria analysis , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Gregory M Peters,et al.  Aggregating sustainability indicators: beyond the weighted sum. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  Ian D. Bishop Location based information to support understanding of landscape futures , 2015 .

[11]  Zoran Kapelan,et al.  Decision-support tools for sustainable urban development , 2005 .

[12]  Steven P. French,et al.  The Future of GIS in Planning: Converging Technologies and Diverging Interests , 2008 .

[13]  Trevor M. Harris,et al.  The application of GIS in urban and regional planning: a review of the North American experience , 1993 .

[14]  Richard Levy Visualization of Urban Alternatives , 1995 .

[15]  Arnis Cirulis,et al.  3D Outdoor Augmented Reality for Architecture and Urban Planning , 2013, VARE.

[16]  Cam Campbell,et al.  The digital workshop: exploring the use of interactive and immersive visualisation tools in participatory planning. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[17]  T. Buchholz,et al.  Sustainability criteria for bioenergy systems: results from an expert survey , 2009 .

[18]  Haim Levkowitz,et al.  Color scales for image data , 1992, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[19]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Interrogation of a dynamic visualization during learning , 2004 .

[20]  John P. Isaacs,et al.  Sustainable Urban Development in Practice: The SAVE Concept , 2014 .

[21]  Marc Levoy,et al.  Interactive visualization of 3D medical data , 1989, Computer.

[22]  John P. Isaacs,et al.  Real-Time Visual Simulation of Urban Sustainability , 2013 .

[23]  S. Sheppard,et al.  Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups , 2005 .

[24]  David Butler,et al.  Making asset investment decisions for wastewater systems that include sustainability , 2008 .

[25]  D. Blackwood,et al.  Sustainable development indicators for major infrastructure projects , 2011 .

[26]  Cevriye Gencer,et al.  Analytic network process in supplier selection: A case study in an electronic firm , 2007 .

[27]  Victoria Interrante,et al.  Weaving Versus Blending: a quantitative assessment of the information carrying capacities of two alternative methods for conveying multivariate data with color , 2007, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[28]  Andrew D.F. Price,et al.  Integrated assessment of urban sustainability , 2005 .

[29]  Marian G. Williams,et al.  Why are geographic information systems hard to use? , 1995, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[30]  Deborah Hix,et al.  User-centered design and evaluation of a real-time battlefield visualization virtual environment , 1999, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316).

[31]  Eckart Lange,et al.  What you see is not always what you get: A qualitative, comparative analysis of ex ante visualizations with ex post photography of landscape and architectural projects , 2015 .

[32]  Markus Starkl,et al.  Feasibility versus sustainability in urban water management. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.