An Extended Kalman Filter for Fetal Heart Location Estimation During Doppler-Based Heart Rate Monitoring

Fetal heart rate (fHR) monitoring using the Doppler ultrasound (US) is a standard clinical practice for assessing fetal well-being before and during labor. For continuous fHR measurements, the US transducer is positioned on the maternal abdomen using a flexible belt. Due to fetal movement, the relative fetal heart location (fHL) with respect to the US transducer can change, leading to frequent periods of signal loss hampering the clinical assessment of fetal health. Consequently, the clinical staff has to repeatedly reposition the US transducer—a cumbersome task affecting clinical workflow. We propose a method to estimate the fHL during fHR monitoring to support clinicians in efficiently repositioning the US transducer. Unlike typical US transducers, which do not provide any information on the spatial fHL, we exploit the fact that multiple transducer elements are present in the array aperture of the US transducer. We developed a novel model that relates the measured Doppler power in the individual transducer elements to the fHL and use it within the probabilistic framework of an extended Kalman filter (EKF). The performance of the EKF algorithm was evaluated in simulations and in in vitro experiments using a dedicated setup of a beating fetal heart. Both simulations and in vitro experiments showed that the fHL can be determined with an accuracy of 4 mm. Furthermore, we demonstrate that when the fetal heart is drifting out of the US beam, the EKF algorithm accurately estimates the fHL up to a radial distance of 34 mm.

[1]  J. A. Crowe,et al.  The information content of Doppler ultrasound signals from the fetal heart , 2001, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[2]  Paul Hamelmann,et al.  Improved ultrasound transducer positioning by fetal heart location estimation during Doppler based heart rate measurements. , 2017, Physiological measurement.

[3]  Janusz Jezewski,et al.  A novel technique for fetal heart rate estimation from Doppler ultrasound signal , 2011, Biomedical engineering online.

[4]  R. Mehra On the identification of variances and adaptive Kalman filtering , 1970 .

[5]  Mahesan Niranjan,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian-Kalman models for regularisation and ARD in sequential learning , 1997 .

[6]  T. Tongsong,et al.  Fetal cardiac dimensions at 14–40 weeks' gestation obtained using cardio‐STIC‐M , 2011, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[7]  Michelle L Murray,et al.  Maternal or fetal heart rate? Avoiding intrapartum misidentification. , 2004, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.

[8]  L Pourcelot,et al.  The Actifetus system: a multidoppler sensor system for monitoring fetal movements. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  R. Berendsen,et al.  Beat-to-beat detection of fetal heart rate: Doppler ultrasound cardiotocography compared to direct ECG cardiotocography in time and frequency domain. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[10]  Hagen Malberg,et al.  Maternal signal estimation by Kalman filtering and Template Adaptation for fetal heart rate extraction , 2013, Computing in Cardiology 2013.

[11]  Denis Ensminger,et al.  A new velocity estimation method using spectral identification of noise , 2008 .

[12]  A. Boulesteix,et al.  What is the “normal” fetal heart rate? , 2013, PeerJ.

[13]  D Paladini,et al.  Sonography in obese and overweight pregnant women: clinical, medicolegal and technical issues , 2009, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[14]  J. Bernardes,et al.  Twenty‐five years after the FIGO guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring: Time for a simplified approach? , 2010, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[15]  Lawrence M Leemis,et al.  Univariate Distribution Relationships , 2008 .

[16]  L. Brodin,et al.  Reference values for fetal tissue velocity imaging and a new approach to evaluate fetal myocardial function , 2013, Cardiovascular Ultrasound.

[17]  Maria G. Signorini,et al.  Monitoring Fetal Heart Rate during Pregnancy: Contributions from Advanced Signal Processing and Wearable Technology , 2014, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.