Optimization of X-ray Investigations in Dentistry Using Optical Coherence Tomography

The most common imaging technique for dental diagnoses and treatment monitoring is X-ray imaging, which evolved from the first intraoral radiographs to high-quality three-dimensional (3D) Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Other imaging techniques have shown potential, such as Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). We have recently reported on the boundaries of these two types of techniques, regarding. the dental fields where each one is more appropriate or where they should be both used. The aim of the present study is to explore the unique capabilities of the OCT technique to optimize X-ray units imaging (i.e., in terms of image resolution, radiation dose, or contrast). Two types of commercially available and widely used X-ray units are considered. To adjust their parameters, a protocol is developed to employ OCT images of dental conditions that are documented on high (i.e., less than 10 μm) resolution OCT images (both B-scans/cross sections and 3D reconstructions) but are hardly identified on the 200 to 75 μm resolution panoramic or CBCT radiographs. The optimized calibration of the X-ray unit includes choosing appropriate values for the anode voltage and current intensity of the X-ray tube, as well as the patient’s positioning, in order to reach the highest possible X-rays resolution at a radiation dose that is safe for the patient. The optimization protocol is developed in vitro on OCT images of extracted teeth and is further applied in vivo for each type of dental investigation. Optimized radiographic results are compared with un-optimized previously performed radiographs. Also, we show that OCT can permit a rigorous comparison between two (types of) X-ray units. In conclusion, high-quality dental images are possible using low radiation doses if an optimized protocol, developed using OCT, is applied for each type of dental investigation. Also, there are situations when the X-ray technology has drawbacks for dental diagnosis or treatment assessment. In such situations, OCT proves capable to provide qualitative images.

[1]  Ralph Alexandru Erdelyi,et al.  Optimization of radiation doses and patients’ risk in dental radiography , 2019 .

[2]  Roshan Dsouza,et al.  Clinical translation of handheld optical coherence tomography: practical considerations and recent advancements , 2017, Journal of biomedical optics.

[3]  Axel Ruprecht,et al.  Oral and maxillofacial radiology: then and now. , 2008, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[4]  Adrian Bradu,et al.  Assessment of Ductile, Brittle, and Fatigue Fractures of Metals Using Optical Coherence Tomography , 2018 .

[5]  Daniel Fried,et al.  Imaging artificial caries under composite sealants and restorations. , 2004, Journal of biomedical optics.

[6]  J B Ludlow,et al.  Effective dose of dental CBCT-a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. , 2015, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[7]  R. Taboryski,et al.  Comparison of optical methods for surface roughness characterization , 2015 .

[8]  Conrado Aparicio,et al.  Assessing near infrared optical properties of ceramic orthodontic brackets using cross-polarization optical coherence tomography. , 2014, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[9]  Martin F. Kraus,et al.  Handheld ultrahigh speed swept source optical coherence tomography instrument using a MEMS scanning mirror. , 2013, Biomedical optics express.

[10]  J. Duker,et al.  Optical coherence tomography – current and future applications , 2013, Current Opinion in Ophthalmology.

[11]  Jui-che Tsai,et al.  Dental Optical Coherence Tomography , 2013, Sensors.

[12]  Changhuei Yang,et al.  Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. , 2003, Optics express.

[13]  A. Bradu,et al.  Dental Diagnosis and Treatment Assessments: Between X-rays Radiography and Optical Coherence Tomography , 2020, Materials.

[14]  S. L. Campello,et al.  Marginal analysis of resin composite restorative systems using optical coherence tomography. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[15]  B. Poppe,et al.  Dose-area product measurements in panoramic dental radiology. , 2007, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[16]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Comparison of Four Dental Pulp-Capping Agents by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Histological Techniques—A Split-Mouth Design Ex Vivo Study , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[17]  J. Rolland,et al.  Optimization of galvanometer scanning for optical coherence tomography. , 2015, Applied Optics.

[18]  Adrian Bradu,et al.  Design and testing of prototype handheld scanning probes for optical coherence tomography , 2014, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[19]  Marco Migliorati,et al.  2D vs. 3D Radiological Methods for Dental Age Determination around 18 Years: A Systematic Review , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[20]  Alireza Sadr,et al.  Non-invasive quantification of resin-dentin interfacial gaps using optical coherence tomography: validation against confocal microscopy. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[21]  Felix Krause,et al.  Dental Applications of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) in Cariology , 2017 .

[22]  M. Cohnen,et al.  Radiation dose in dental radiology , 2002, European Radiology.

[23]  Om P Kharbanda,et al.  Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs , 2003, Australian orthodontic journal.

[24]  Adrian Bradu,et al.  Handheld scanning probes for optical coherence tomography , 2015 .

[25]  R. Weiss,et al.  Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review , 2019, Dentistry journal.

[26]  B. Kang,et al.  Reference dose levels for dental panoramic radiography in Gwangju, South Korea. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[27]  T. Gambichler,et al.  Optical coherence tomography in dermatology: technical and clinical aspects , 2011, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[28]  V. Mikla,et al.  Advances in Imaging from the First X-Ray Images , 2014 .

[29]  Angelika Unterhuber,et al.  Optical coherence tomography today: speed, contrast, and multimodality , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[30]  Adrian Bradu,et al.  Effects of Temperature Variations during Sintering of Metal Ceramic Tooth Prostheses Investigated Non-Destructively with Optical Coherence Tomography , 2017 .

[31]  Orlando Frazão,et al.  New Trends in Dental Biomechanics with Photonics Technologies , 2015 .

[32]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical Coherence Tomography , 1991 .

[33]  V. Duma,et al.  Laser scanners with oscillatory elements: Design and optimization of 1D and 2D scanning functions , 2019, Applied Mathematical Modelling.

[34]  Sandro Barone,et al.  Creation of 3D Multi-Body Orthodontic Models by Using Independent Imaging Sensors , 2013, Sensors.

[35]  Oswaldo de Vasconcellos Vilella,et al.  2D / 3D Cone-Beam CT images or conventional radiography: which is more reliable? , 2010 .

[36]  Mihir S. Wagh,et al.  Endoscopic Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT): Advances in Gastrointestinal Imaging , 2014, Gastroenterology research and practice.

[37]  Adrian Bradu,et al.  Assessment of the sealant/tooth interface using optical coherence tomography , 2015 .

[38]  A. Bradu,et al.  Optical Coherence Tomography Investigations and Modeling of the Sintering of Ceramic Crowns , 2019, Materials.

[39]  Alireza Sadr,et al.  Diagnosis of Occlusal Caries with Dynamic Slicing of 3D Optical Coherence Tomography Images , 2020, Sensors.

[40]  Chih-Yuan Yao,et al.  Interactive OCT-Based Tooth Scan and Reconstruction , 2019, Sensors.

[41]  S. Carlo,et al.  Validation of an Intra-Oral Scan Method Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography Superimposition to Assess the Accuracy between Planned and Achieved Dental Implants: A Randomized In Vitro Study , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[42]  D. Theisen-Kunde,et al.  An Intraoral OCT Probe to Enhanced Detection of Approximal Carious Lesions and Assessment of Restorations , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[43]  Adrian Bradu,et al.  Master-slave interferometry for parallel spectral domain interferometry sensing and versatile 3D optical coherence tomography. , 2013, Optics express.

[44]  H. Shin,et al.  Effective doses from panoramic radiography and CBCT (cone beam CT) using dose area product (DAP) in dentistry. , 2014, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[45]  Adrian Bradu,et al.  Surface imaging of metallic material fractures using optical coherence tomography. , 2014, Applied optics.