Pattern electroretinogram and psychophysical tests of visual function for discriminating between healthy and glaucoma eyes.

PURPOSE To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the pattern electroretinogram (pattern ERG) to that of standard automated perimetry (SAP), short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP), and frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry for discriminating between healthy and glaucomatous eyes. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. METHODS Eighty-three eyes of 42 healthy recruits and 92 eyes of 54 glaucoma patients (based on optic disc appearance) from the University of California, San Diego, Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study were tested with pattern ERG for glaucoma detection (PERGLA; Lace Elettronica, Pisa, Italy), SAP, SWAP, and FDT within 9 months. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated and compared for pattern ERG amplitude and SAP, SWAP, and FDT mean deviation and pattern standard deviation (PSD). Sensitivities and specificities were compared and agreement among tests was described. RESULTS The area under the ROC curve for pattern ERG amplitude was 0.744 (95% confidence interval = 0.670, 0.818). The ROC curve area was 0.786 (0.720, 0.853) for SAP PSD, 0.732 (0.659, 0.806) for SWAP PSD, and 0.818 (0.758, 0.879) for FDT PSD. At 95% specificity, sensitivities of SAP and FDT PSD were significantly higher than that of pattern ERG amplitude; at 80% specificity, similar sensitivities were observed among tests. Agreement among tests was slight to moderate. CONCLUSION The diagnostic accuracy of the pattern ERG amplitude was similar to that of SAP and SWAP, but somewhat worse than that of FDT. Nevertheless, the pattern ERG may hold some advantage over psychophysical testing because of its largely objective nature.

[1]  A. Fiorentini,et al.  Electroretinographic responses to alternating gratings before and after section of the optic nerve. , 1981, Science.

[2]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[3]  C. Erb,et al.  Detection of optic neuropathy in glaucomatous eyes with normal standard visual fields using a test battery of short-wavelength automated perimetry and pattern electroretinography. , 2002, Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.).

[4]  M. Bach,et al.  Pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma and ocular hypertension , 1989, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[5]  E. Sutter,et al.  M and P Components of the VEP and their Visual Field Distribution , 1997, Vision Research.

[6]  Lori M. Ventura,et al.  Normative data for a user-friendly paradigm for pattern electroretinogram recording. , 2004, Ophthalmology.

[7]  J. Robson,et al.  Evidence for a ganglion cell contribution to the primate electroretinogram (ERG): Effects of TTX on the multifocal ERG in macaque , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[8]  B. Chauhan,et al.  Longitudinal changes in the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma , 2005, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[9]  Ronit Nesher,et al.  The pattern electroretinogram in retinal and optic nerve disease , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[10]  A. James,et al.  Testing for glaucoma with the spatial frequency doubling illusion , 1999, Vision Research.

[11]  W. Swanson,et al.  A new pattern electroretinogram paradigm evaluated in terms of user friendliness and agreement with perimetry. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[12]  A. Tafreshi,et al.  Repeatability of Pattern Electroretinogram Measurements Using a New Paradigm Optimized for Glaucoma Detection , 2009, Journal of glaucoma.

[13]  A J Adams,et al.  Optimum Parameters for Short‐Wavelength Automated Perimetry , 1996, Journal of glaucoma.

[14]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[15]  M. Wall,et al.  Effect of instructions on conventional automated perimetry. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  P. Sample,et al.  Short-wavelength automated perimetry. , 2003, Ophthalmology clinics of North America.

[17]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  Lori M. Ventura,et al.  Pattern electroretinogram abnormality and glaucoma. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[19]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Visual function-specific perimetry to identify glaucomatous visual loss using three different definitions of visual field abnormality. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  A. Tafreshi,et al.  Effect of Operator and Optical Defocus on the Variability of Pattern Electroretinogram Optimized for Glaucoma Detection (PERGLA) , 2010, Journal of glaucoma.

[21]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Performance of efficient test procedures for frequency-doubling technology perimetry in normal and glaucomatous eyes. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  L. Maffei,et al.  Pattern ERG in the monkey after section of the optic nerve , 1986, Behavioural Brain Research.

[23]  C. Baker,et al.  Current source density analysis of linear and non‐linear components of the primate electroretinogram. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  C A Johnson,et al.  Frequency doubling technology perimetry using a 24--2 stimulus presentation pattern. , 1999, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[25]  R. Hitchings,et al.  The pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. , 1992, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[26]  DH Hubel,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  D. Dacey.  Physiology, morphology and spatial densities of identified ganglion cell types in primate retina. , 1994, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[28]  S. Klein,et al.  The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[29]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of the Matrix 24-2 and original N-30 frequency-doubling technology tests compared with standard automated perimetry. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[30]  P. Khaw,et al.  Primary open-angle glaucoma , 2004, The Lancet.

[31]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[32]  A. Tafreshi,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of pattern electroretinogram optimized for glaucoma detection. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[33]  Joseph San Laureano.  When is glaucoma really glaucoma , 2007 .

[34]  R. Anderson.  The psychophysics of glaucoma: Improving the structure/function relationship , 2006, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[35]  H. Rootzén,et al.  A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[36]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[37]  Michael Bach,et al.  Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision , 1991 .

[38]  Douglas R. Anderson,et al.  Reproducibility of pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma patients with a range of severity of disease with the new glaucoma paradigm. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[39]  P A Sample,et al.  Color perimetry for assessment of primary open-angle glaucoma. , 1990, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.