Cross-Modal Morphological Priming in French

We investigated the lexical representation of morphologically complex words in French using a cross-modal priming experiment. We asked if the lexical representation for derivationally suffixed and prefixed words is morphologically structured and how this relates to the phonological transparency of the surface relationship between stem and affix. Overall we observed a clear effect of the morphological structure for derived words, an effect that is not explicable by a formal effect. Prefixed words prime their stems, even when they have a phonologically opaque relationship, and a prefixed word primes another prefixed word derived from the same stem. However, suffixed words prime their stems only if their relationship is phonologically transparent. Two suffixed words derived from the same stem prime each other. These two latter results differ from those observed in English by Marslen-Wilson, Tyler, Waksler, and Older (1994). We argue that it is the specific properties of the language, such as rhythm, that could explain the differences between the results observed for the two languages and we propose a model where prefixed and suffixed words are decomposed at different stages during their identification process.

[1]  L. Feldman,et al.  Morphological facilitation following prefixed but not suffixed primes: lexical architecture or modality-specific processes? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  J. Segui,et al.  Frequency Effects in Auditory Word Recognition: The Case of Suffixed Words , 1999 .

[3]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Abstractness, Allomorphy, and Lexical Architecture , 1999 .

[4]  J. Segui,et al.  Morphological Priming Effect: The Role of Surface Frequency , 1999, Brain and Language.

[5]  Laurie Beth Feldman,et al.  Morphological aspects of language processing. , 1997 .

[6]  C. Beauvillain,et al.  The Integration of Morphological and Whole-Word Form Information during Eye Fixations on Prefixed and Suffixed Words ☆ , 1996 .

[7]  P. Zwitserlood,et al.  Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  L. Feldman.  Beyond Orthography and Phonology: Differences between Inflections and Derivations , 1994 .

[9]  J. Grainger,et al.  Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. , 1991 .

[10]  S. Bentin,et al.  The Contribution of Morphological and Semantic Relatedness to Repetition Priming at Short and Long Lags: Evidence from Hebrew , 1990, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[11]  L. Katz,et al.  Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: a multilingual comparison. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  D. Bouwhuis,et al.  Attention and performance X : control of language processes , 1986 .

[13]  C. Fowler,et al.  Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[14]  J. Morton,et al.  The effects of priming with regularly and irregularly related words in auditory word recognition. , 1982, British journal of psychology.

[15]  Comrie Bernard.  Language Universals and Linguistic Typology , 1982 .

[16]  R. F. Stanners,et al.  Memory representation for morphologically related words. , 1979 .

[17]  William D Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  L. Manelis,et al.  The processing of affixed words , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[19]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words , 1975 .

[20]  A. Zwicky,et al.  The handbook of morphology , 2001 .

[21]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Morphology in word recognition , 1998 .

[22]  F. Meunier.  Morphologie et traitement du langage parlé , 1997 .

[23]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. , 1994 .

[24]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity , 1992 .

[25]  Alessandro Laudanna,et al.  Chapter 18 Units of Representation for Derived Words in the Lexicon , 1992 .

[26]  Ram Frost,et al.  Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning , 1992 .

[27]  A. Caramazza.  Some aspects of language processing revealed through the analysis of acquired aphasia: the lexical system. , 1988, Annual review of neuroscience.

[28]  Lars Borin,et al.  What is a lexical representation? , 1985, NODALIDA.

[29]  L. Katz,et al.  Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  Bernard Comrie,et al.  Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology , 1981 .