Transparent optical network dimensioning for self-organizing routing

While transparent optical networks become more and more popular as the basis of the next generation Internet (NGI) infrastructure, such networks raise many security issues, which do not exist in traditional optoelectronic networks. The existing protection schemes which rely heavily on fault detection with the use of network monitoring performed by optoelectronic conversion at the switching nodes, is not sufficient to provide security assurance for all optical networks that lack the massive use of optoelectronic monitoring and require timely protection from malicious sabotage as well as inadvertent faults. In order to increase the security of future networks, they will need to use reactive mechanisms and self-organize through multipath routing (MPR) to protect themselves from potential failures caused by malicious new attacks and ordinary reliability problems. In this paper we are proposing a method for network dimensioning when self-organizing routing as MPR is used as an instinct immediate network reaction to failures and attacks in transparent networks.

[1]  Muriel Médard,et al.  Distributed Algorithms for Attack Localization in All-Optical Networks , 1998, NDSS.

[2]  Jean-Yves Le Boudec,et al.  Self Organized Terminode Routing , 2002, Cluster Computing.

[3]  W. Cerroni,et al.  Routing techniques in optical packet-switched networks , 2005, Proceedings of 2005 7th International Conference Transparent Optical Networks, 2005..

[4]  S.L. Danielsen,et al.  Optical packet switched network layer without optical buffers , 1998, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[5]  A.E. Willner,et al.  Optical performance monitoring , 2004, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[6]  Ozan K. Tonguz,et al.  Failure location algorithm for transparent optical networks , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[7]  Ozan K. Tonguz,et al.  Security in All-Optical Networks: Self-Organization and Attack Avoidance , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[8]  Ioannis Tomkos,et al.  Performance engineering of metropolitan area optical networks through impairment constraint routing , 2004, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[9]  Marco Listanti,et al.  Dimensioning Models of Shared Resources for Optical Packet Switching in Unbalanced Input/Output Traffic Scenarios , 2006, IEICE Trans. Commun..

[10]  Lakshman Tamil,et al.  Optical packet switching with multiple path routing , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[11]  Gerardo A. Castanon Performance requirements for semitransparent DWDM networks , 2004, SPIE Optics East.

[12]  Ozan K. Tonguz,et al.  On the design of self-organized cellular wireless networks , 2005, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[13]  David Hales,et al.  SLACER: a self-organizing protocol for coordination in peer-to-peer networks , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[14]  Franco Callegati,et al.  QoS differentiation in optical packet-switched networks , 2006, Comput. Commun..

[15]  G. Castanon,et al.  Security in all-optical networks: Failure and attack avoidance using self-organization , 2008, 2008 2nd ICTON Mediterranean Winter.

[16]  S. Sarwar,et al.  Dimensioning an optical packet/burst switch — More interconnections or more delay lines? , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling.

[17]  Muriel Médard,et al.  Attack Detection Methods for All-Optical Networks , 1998, NDSS.