Direct bronchoprovocation test methods: history 1945–2018

ABSTRACT Introduction: Bronchoprovocation inhalation challenge tests with direct acting stimuli (e.g. methacholine) are widely used clinically to aid in the diagnosis of asthma. Areas covered: The history of direct challenges with histamine and muscarinic agonists is reviewed. This began with parenteral administration of stimuli with responses monitored clinically and by VC, progressing to inhalation dose-response challenges monitored by FEV1 and FEV1/VC ratio, both (the challenge method and the technology to measure FEV1) developed by Robert Tiffeneau in the mid-1940s. Careful standardization of methods has become appreciated albeit after-the-fact. Recent guidelines recommend standardizing the methacholine PD20 at 400 μg above which a methacholine challenge is considered negative. Conclusions: The methacholine inhalation test is highly sensitive for a diagnosis of current asthma when symptoms under evaluation are clinically current and when methacholine is inhaled without deep inhalations. Under these circumstances, a methacholine PD20 > 400 μg excludes current asthma with reasonable certainty. PD20 values >25 μg and ≤400 μg will have a variable specificity and positive predictive value for asthma which increases the lower the PD20 and the higher the pre-test probability for a diagnosis of asthma. A PD20 ≤25 μg has high specificity and low sensitivity for asthma.

[1]  A. Coates,et al.  Characterizing Nebulizer Performance for Methacholine Challenge Tests. , 2018, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[2]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  Bronchoprotective effect of vilanterol against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in mild asthmatics: A randomized three-way crossover study. , 2018, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.

[3]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  Methacholine Challenge Testing: A Novel Method for Measuring PD20 , 2017, Chest.

[4]  L. Boulet,et al.  Methacholine Challenge: Comparison of Airway Responsiveness Produced by a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus a Jet Nebulizer. , 2017, Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery.

[5]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  The effect of glycopyrronium and indacaterol, as monotherapy and in combination, on the methacholine dose-response curve of mild asthmatics: a randomized three-way crossover study , 2017, Respiratory Research.

[6]  A. Coates,et al.  ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: general considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests , 2017, European Respiratory Journal.

[7]  A. Coates,et al.  The PD20 but not the PC20 in a methacholine challenge test is device independent. , 2017, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.

[8]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  Duration of bronchoprotection of the long-acting muscarinic antagonists tiotropium & glycopyrronium against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in mild asthmatics. , 2016, Respiratory medicine.

[9]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  Comparison of the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 between the AeroEclipse II breath-actuated nebulizer and the wright nebulizer in adult subjects with asthma. , 2015, Annals of the American Thoracic Society.

[10]  P. O'Byrne,et al.  Asthma induced by cold air and its relation to nonspecific bronchial responsiveness to methacholine. , 2015, The American review of respiratory disease.

[11]  A. Beaupré,et al.  Influence of the previous deep inspiration on the spirometric measurement of provoked bronchoconstriction in asthma. , 2015, The American review of respiratory disease.

[12]  A. Coates,et al.  Provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 should be used to interpret methacholine challenge tests with modern nebulizers. , 2015, Annals of the American Thoracic Society.

[13]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  Effect of ingested H₁ antihistamines on methacholine challenge. , 2015, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[14]  A. Coates,et al.  Developing alternative delivery systems for methacholine challenge tests. , 2014, Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery.

[15]  E. Herrmann,et al.  Methacholine challenge in young children as evaluated by spirometry and impulse oscillometry. , 2012, Respiratory medicine.

[16]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  The effect of caffeinated coffee on airway response to methacholine and exhaled nitric oxide. , 2011, Respiratory medicine.

[17]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  Histamine and methacholine challenge cut points. , 2010, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.

[18]  L. Boulet,et al.  Prolonged bronchoprotection against inhaled methacholine by inhaled BI 1744, a long-acting beta(2)-agonist, in patients with mild asthma. , 2009, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[19]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  Direct and indirect challenges in the clinical assessment of asthma. , 2009, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.

[20]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  Duration of bronchoprotection of inhaled ipratropium against inhaled methacholine. , 2009, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.

[21]  J. Marín,et al.  Differences in the response to methacholine between the tidal breathing and dosimeter methods: influence of the dose of bronchoconstrictor agent delivered to the mouth. , 2008, Chest.

[22]  S. Weiss,et al.  Airway responsiveness in mild to moderate childhood asthma: sex influences on the natural history. , 2008, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[23]  A. Kozyrskyj,et al.  Diagnosing asthma in children: What is the role for methacholine bronchoprovocation testing? , 2008, Pediatric pulmonology.

[24]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  The bronchoprotective effect of inhaling methacholine by using total lung capacity inspirations has a marked influence on the interpretation of the test result. , 2006, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[25]  E M Tansey,et al.  Henry Dale and the discovery of acetylcholine. , 2006, Comptes rendus biologies.

[26]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  Difference between dosimeter and tidal breathing methacholine challenge: contributions of dose and deep inspiration bronchoprotection. , 2005, Chest.

[27]  R. Ruffolo,et al.  Drug discovery , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[28]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  Methacholine challenge: comparison of two methods. , 2005, Chest.

[29]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  Dosimeter methacholine challenge: comparison of maximal versus submaximal inhalations. , 2004, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[30]  S. Chesrown,et al.  Methacholine challenge testing: comparison of the two American Thoracic Society-recommended methods. , 2004, Chest.

[31]  S. Anderson,et al.  Indirect airway challenges , 2003, European Respiratory Journal.

[32]  S. Anderson,et al.  Exercise in elite summer athletes: Challenges for diagnosis. , 2002, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[33]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  Methacholine challenge: test-shortening procedures. , 2001, Chest.

[34]  A. Togias,et al.  Deep inspiration-induced bronchoprotection is stronger than bronchodilation. , 2000, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[35]  A. Togias,et al.  Potent bronchoprotective effect of deep inspiration and its absence in asthma. , 2000, Journal of applied physiology.

[36]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  Calculation of Provocative Concentration Causing a 20% Fall in FEV1 , 2000 .

[37]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  Dose versus concentration of methacholine. , 1999, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.

[38]  R. Pellegrino,et al.  Assessing the effect of deep inhalation on airway calibre: a novel approach to lung function in bronchial asthma and COPD. , 1998, The European respiratory journal.

[39]  T. Similowski,et al.  Expiration forcée : Quelques concepts actuels, 50 ans après Robert Tiffeneau , 1997 .

[40]  E. Juniper,et al.  Standardized challenge testing with pharmacological, physical and sensitizing stimuli in adults , 1993, European Respiratory Journal.

[41]  E. Mitchell,et al.  The interrelationship among bronchial hyperresponsiveness, the diagnosis of asthma, and asthma symptoms. , 1990, The American review of respiratory disease.

[42]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  Airway hyperresponsiveness. Relevance of random population data to clinical usefulness. , 1990, The American review of respiratory disease.

[43]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  Importance of evaporative water losses during standardized nebulized inhalation provocation tests. , 1989, Chest.

[44]  R. Pauwels,et al.  Bronchial hyperresponsiveness is not bronchial hyperresponsiveness is not bronchial asthma , 1988, Clinical allergy.

[45]  P. O'Byrne,et al.  Bronchoalveolar cell profiles of asthmatic and nonasthmatic subjects. , 1987, The American review of respiratory disease.

[46]  E. Juniper,et al.  Histamine inhalation tests: inhalation of aerosol via a facemask versus a valve box with mouthpiece. , 1984, Thorax.

[47]  A. Woolcock,et al.  Rapid method for measurement of bronchial responsiveness. , 1983, Thorax.

[48]  J. Malo,et al.  Histamine dose-response curves in asthma: reproducibility and sensitivity of different indices to assess response. , 1983, Thorax.

[49]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  Standardization of inhalation provocation tests. Dose vs concentration of histamine. , 1982, Chest.

[50]  F. Hargreave,et al.  Bronchial responsiveness to histamine: relationship to diurnal variation of peak flow rate, improvement after bronchodilator, and airway calibre , 1982, Thorax.

[51]  E. Juniper,et al.  Airway responsiveness to histamine and methacholine: relationship to minimum treatment to control symptoms of asthma. , 1981, Thorax.

[52]  E. Juniper,et al.  Standardization of inhalation provocation tests: influence of nebulizer output, particle size, and method of inhalation. , 1981, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[53]  P. Frith,et al.  Standardization of inhalation provocation tests: two techniques of aerosol generation and inhalation compared. , 1981, The American review of respiratory disease.

[54]  R. Schoeffel,et al.  Comparison of bronchial reactivity to histamine and methacholine in asthmatics , 1980, Clinical allergy.

[55]  P. Frith,et al.  Determinants of allergen-induced asthma: dose of allergen, circulating IgE antibody concentration, and bronchial responsiveness to inhaled histamine. , 1979, The American review of respiratory disease.

[56]  J. Malo,et al.  Comparison of histamine bronchial challenges with the Wright nebulizer and the dosimeter , 1979, Clinical allergy.

[57]  P. Frith,et al.  Bronchial responsiveness to inhaled histamine and exercise. , 1979, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[58]  P. Frith,et al.  Reproducibility and comparison of responses to inhaled histamine and methacholine. , 1978, Thorax.

[59]  F. Hargreave,et al.  Bronchial reactivity to inhaled histamine: a method and clinical survey , 1977, Clinical allergy.

[60]  J. Nadel,et al.  Mechanisms of bronchial hyperreactivity in normal subjects after upper respiratory tract infection. , 1976, The American review of respiratory disease.

[61]  S. Spector,et al.  Standardization of bronchial inhalation challenge procedures. , 1975, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[62]  R. Altounyan VARIATION OF DRUG ACTION ON AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION IN MAN. , 1967, Thorax.

[63]  S. Makino,et al.  Clinical significance of bronchial sensitivity to acetylcholine and histamine in bronchial asthma. , 1966, The Journal of allergy.

[64]  C. E. Reed,et al.  METHACHOLINE AEROSOL AS TEST FOR BRONCHIAL ASTHMA. , 1965, Archives of internal medicine.

[65]  R. Townley,et al.  COMPARATIVE ACTION ON ACETYL-BETA-METHYLCHOLINE, HISTAMINE, AND POLLEN ANTIGENS IN SUBJECTS WITH HAY FEVER AND PATIENTS WITH BRONCHIAL ASTHMA. , 1965, The Journal of allergy.

[66]  R. Altounyan Variation of Drug Action on Airway Obstruction in Man , 1964 .

[67]  R. Tiffeneau,et al.  [Acetylcholine aerosols in respiration function tests; study of their motor and sensory effects; practical application]. , 1955, Le Poumon et le coeur.

[68]  J. J. Curry,et al.  COMPARATIVE ACTION OF ACETYL-BETA-METHYL CHOLINE AND HISTAMINE ON THE RESPIRATORY TRACT IN NORMALS, PATIENTS WITH HAY FEVER, AND SUBJECTS WITH BRONCHIAL ASTHMA. , 1947, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[69]  J. J. Curry,et al.  THE ACTION OF HISTAMINE ON THE RESPIRATORY TRACT IN NORMAL AND ASTHMATIC SUBJECTS. , 1946, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[70]  H. Moll The Action of Parasympathetic-Mimetic Drugs in Asthma , 1940 .

[71]  I. Starr,et al.  ACETYL-β‐METHYLCHOLIN I. THE ACTION ON NORMAL PERSONS. WITH A NOTE ON THE ACTION OF THE ETHYL ETHER OF β‐METHYLCHOLIN , 1933 .

[72]  G. P. Robb,et al.  The velocity of blood flow in health and disease as measured by the effect of histamine on the minute vessels , 1929 .

[73]  H. Alexander,et al.  BRONCHIAL ASTHMA: RESPONSE TO PILOCARPIN AND EPINEPHRIN , 1921 .

[74]  H. Dale,et al.  The physiological action of β‐iminazolylethylamine , 1910 .

[75]  G. E. Peters,et al.  Comparison of doubling and quadrupling methacholine concentration regimens using the tidal volume method. , 2011, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.

[76]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  Effect of a single dose of montelukast sodium on methacholine chloride PC20. , 2005, Canadian respiratory journal.

[77]  J. Hankinson,et al.  Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. , 2000, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[78]  T. Similowski,et al.  [Forced expiration. Various current concepts, 50 years after Robert Tiffeneau]. , 1997, Revue des maladies respiratoires.

[79]  S. Anderson,et al.  Airway responsiveness : standardized challenge testing with pharmacological, physical and sensitizing stimuli in adults , 1993 .

[80]  S. Spector,et al.  Bronchial inhalation procedures in asthmatics. , 1974, The Medical clinics of North America.

[81]  de VRIES,et al.  Changes during 24 hours in the lung function and histamine hyperreactivity of the bronchial tree in asthmatic and bronchitic patients. , 1962, International archives of allergy and applied immunology.

[82]  J. J. Curry,et al.  Measurement of vital capacity in asthmatic subjects receiving histamine and acetyl-beta-methyl choline; a clinical study. , 1948, The Journal of allergy.

[83]  R. Major,et al.  PREPARATION AND PROPERTIES OF ALPHA- AND BETA- METHYLCHOLINE AND GAMMA-HOMOCHOLINE1 , 1932 .

[84]  H H Dale,et al.  The physiological action of beta-iminazolylethylamine. , 2022, The Journal of physiology.