Hybrid ODE/SSA Model of the Budding Yeast Cell Cycle Control Mechanism with Mutant Case Study

The budding yeast cell cycle is regulated by complex and multi-scale control mechanisms, and is subject to inherent noise in a cell, resulted from low copy numbers of species such as critical mRNAs. Conventional deterministic models cannot capture this inherent noise. Although stochastic models can generate simulation results to better represent inherent noise in system dynamics, the stochastic approach is often computationally too expensive for complex systems, which exhibit multiscale features in two aspects: species with different scales of abundances and reactions with different scales of firing frequencies. To address this challenge, one promising solution is to adopt a hybrid approach. It replaces the single mathematical representation of either discrete-stochastic formulation or continuous deterministic formulation with an integration of both methods, so that the corresponding advantageous features in both methods are well kept to achieve a trade-off between accuracy and efficiency. In this work, we propose a hybrid stochastic model that represents the regulatory network of the budding yeast cell cycle control mechanism, respectively, by Gillespie's stochastic simulation algorithm (SSA) and ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Simulation results of our model were compared with published experimental measurement on the budding yeast cell cycle. The comparison demonstrates that our hybrid model well represents many critical characteristics of the budding yeast cell cycle, and reproduces more than 100 phenotypes of mutant cases. Moreover, the model accounts for partial viability of certain mutant strains. The last but not the least, the proposed scheme is shown to be considerably faster in both modeling and simulation than the equivalent stochastic simulation.

[1]  Junzhou Huang,et al.  Seq2seq Fingerprint: An Unsupervised Deep Molecular Embedding for Drug Discovery , 2017, BCB.

[2]  D O Morgan,et al.  A late mitotic regulatory network controlling cyclin destruction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1998, Molecular biology of the cell.

[3]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Quantification of protein half-lives in the budding yeast proteome , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  L. Hartwell,et al.  Asymmetrical division of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1980, Journal of bacteriology.

[5]  T M Murali,et al.  From START to FINISH: computational analysis of cell cycle control in budding yeast , 2015, npj Systems Biology and Applications.

[6]  Katherine C. Chen,et al.  Integrative analysis of cell cycle control in budding yeast. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[7]  J. Rawlings,et al.  Approximate simulation of coupled fast and slow reactions for stochastic chemical kinetics , 2002 .

[8]  Linda R. Petzold,et al.  Improved leap-size selection for accelerated stochastic simulation , 2003 .

[9]  J. Tyson,et al.  Regulation of the eukaryotic cell cycle: molecular antagonism, hysteresis, and irreversible transitions. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  R. Steuer Effects of stochasticity in models of the cell cycle: from quantized cycle times to noise-induced oscillations. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  John J. Tyson,et al.  Temporal Organization of the Cell Cycle , 2008, Current Biology.

[12]  Katherine C. Chen,et al.  Kinetic analysis of a molecular model of the budding yeast cell cycle. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[13]  Jean Peccoud,et al.  Measurement and modeling of transcriptional noise in the cell cycle regulatory network , 2013, Cell cycle.

[14]  Andrea Ciliberto,et al.  Antagonism and bistability in protein interaction networks. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  Minping Qian,et al.  Stochastic model of yeast cell-cycle network , 2006, q-bio/0605011.

[16]  J. Tyson,et al.  A stochastic, molecular model of the fission yeast cell cycle: role of the nucleocytoplasmic ratio in cycle time regulation. , 2001, Biophysical chemistry.

[17]  C. Rao,et al.  Stochastic chemical kinetics and the quasi-steady-state assumption: Application to the Gillespie algorithm , 2003 .

[18]  John J. Tyson,et al.  The coordination of cell growth and division — intentional or Incidental? , 1985 .

[19]  Michio Ito,et al.  The Cell Cycle in the Fission Yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe . I. Relationship between Cell Size and Cycle Time , 1978 .

[20]  D. Gillespie A General Method for Numerically Simulating the Stochastic Time Evolution of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1976 .

[21]  F. Cross,et al.  The effects of molecular noise and size control on variability in the budding yeast cell cycle , 2007, Nature.

[22]  John J. Tyson,et al.  A Hybrid Stochastic Model of the Budding Yeast Cell Cycle Control Mechanism , 2016, BCB.

[23]  Frederick R. Cross,et al.  The effects of molecular noise and size control on variability in the budding yeast cell cycle , 2007, Nature.

[24]  John J Tyson,et al.  Exploring the roles of noise in the eukaryotic cell cycle , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Katherine C. Chen,et al.  A Model of Yeast Cell-Cycle Regulation Based on a Standard Component Modeling Strategy for Protein Regulatory Networks , 2016, PloS one.

[26]  L. Johnston,et al.  The Swi5 transcription factor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae has a role in exit from mitosis through induction of the cdk-inhibitor Sic1 in telophase. , 1997, Genetics.

[27]  John J. Tyson,et al.  Stochastic exit from mitosis in budding yeast , 2011, Cell cycle.

[28]  Michael A. Gibson,et al.  Efficient Exact Stochastic Simulation of Chemical Systems with Many Species and Many Channels , 2000 .

[29]  J. Tyson Modeling the cell division cycle: cdc2 and cyclin interactions. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Attila Csikász-Nagy,et al.  Stochastic Petri Net extension of a yeast cell cycle model. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[32]  Zhen Liu,et al.  Hybrid modeling and simulation of stochastic effects on progression through the eukaryotic cell cycle. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[33]  D. Gillespie Approximate accelerated stochastic simulation of chemically reacting systems , 2001 .

[34]  John J Tyson,et al.  A model of yeast cell-cycle regulation based on multisite phosphorylation , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[35]  Stefan Bornholdt,et al.  Superstability of the yeast cell-cycle dynamics: ensuring causality in the presence of biochemical stochasticity. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.