Complementary configuration and operation of a CCHP-ORC system

The electricity to thermal energy output ratio is an important impact factor for the operating modes and performances of combined cooling, heating and power (CCHP) systems. If the energy requirements of users are managed to just match this ration, the system efficiency would reach the maximum. However, due to the randomness of load demands, this situation is rare to be achieved in practice. To solve this problem, a complementary CCHP-ORC system is configured in this paper. The salient feature of this system is that its electricity to thermal energy output ratio can be adjusted by changing the loads of electric chiller and organic Rankine cycle (ORC) dynamically. For this system, an optimal operation strategy and a corresponding implemented decision making process are presented within a wide load range. Case studies based on a hypothetical CCHP-ORC system for a hotel in Beijing are implemented. The results show that the primary energy consumption, the carbon dioxide emissions and the operation cost of the proposed CCHP-ORC system are all better than those of the conventional CCHP system.

[1]  Yang Shi,et al.  A Novel Optimal Operational Strategy for the CCHP System Based on Two Operating Modes , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Pedro J. Mago,et al.  Analysis and optimization of CCHP systems based on energy, economical, and environmental considerations , 2009 .

[3]  Nelson Fumo,et al.  Analysis of combined cooling, heating, and power systems based on source primary energy consumption , 2010 .

[4]  Antonio Piacentino,et al.  Optimal design of CHCP plants in the civil sector by thermoeconomics , 2007 .

[5]  Chia-Chin Chuang,et al.  Engineering design and exergy analyses for combustion gas turbine based power generation system , 2004 .

[6]  Fahad A. Al-Sulaiman,et al.  Performance comparison of three trigeneration systems using organic rankine cycles , 2011 .

[7]  Sau Man Lai,et al.  Feasibility and flexibility for a trigeneration system , 2009 .

[8]  Asfaw Beyene,et al.  Sizing CCHP Systems for Variable and Non-coincident Loads , 2008 .

[9]  Antonio Piacentino,et al.  Energy saving in airports by trigeneration. Part I: Assessing economic and technical potential , 2006 .

[10]  You-Yin Jing,et al.  Multi-objective optimization design and operation strategy analysis of BCHP system based on life cycle assessment , 2012 .

[11]  G. Chicco,et al.  From cogeneration to trigeneration: profitable alternatives in a competitive market , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[12]  Ruzhu Wang,et al.  COMBINED COOLING, HEATING AND POWER: A REVIEW , 2006 .

[13]  Asfaw Beyene,et al.  Sizing CCHP Systems for Variable and Non-coincident Loads, Part 2: Operating Strategies , 2008 .

[14]  Pierluigi Mancarella,et al.  Matrix modelling of small-scale trigeneration systems and application to operational optimization , 2009 .

[15]  Antonio Piacentino,et al.  Energy saving in airports by trigeneration. Part II: Short and long term planning for the Malpensa 2000 CHCP plant , 2006 .

[16]  K.M. Nor,et al.  Optimal Sizing for a Gas-Fired Grid-Connected Cogeneration System Planning , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[17]  Pierluigi Mancarella,et al.  Assessment of the greenhouse gas emissions from cogeneration and trigeneration systems. Part I: Models and indicators , 2008 .

[18]  Vincent Lemort,et al.  Technological and Economical Survey of Organic Rankine Cycle Systems , 2009 .

[19]  F. Freschi,et al.  Optimal energy management , 2009, IEEE Industry Applications Magazine.

[20]  Pedro J. Mago,et al.  Analysis and optimization of the use of CHP–ORC systems for small commercial buildings , 2010 .