Clinical trials of health information technology interventions intended for patient use: Unique issues and considerations

Background Despite the proliferation of health information technology (IT) interventions, descriptions of the unique considerations for conducting randomized trials of health IT interventions intended for patient use are lacking. Purpose Our purpose is to describe the protocol to evaluate Pocket PATH® (Personal Assistant for Tracking Health), a novel health IT intervention, as an exemplar of how to address issues that may be unique to a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate health IT intended for patient use. Methods An overview of the study protocol is presented. Unique considerations for health IT intervention trials and strategies are described to maintain equipoise, to monitor data safety and intervention fidelity, and to keep pace with changing technology during such trials. Lessons Learned The sovereignty granted to technology, the rapid pace of changes in technology, ubiquitous use in health care, and obligation to maintain the safety of research participants challenge researchers to address these issues in ways that maintain the integrity of intervention trials designed to evaluate the impact of health IT interventions intended for patient use. Conclusions Our experience evaluating the efficacy of Pocket PATH may provide practical guidance to investigators about how to comply with established procedures for conducting RCTs and include strategies to address the unique issues associated with the evaluation of health IT for patient use.

[1]  James R. Lewis,et al.  IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  Annette N. Markham,et al.  Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research: Version 2.0 Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee , 2012 .

[3]  S. Studer,et al.  Evaluation of the Electronic Version of the Questionnaire for Lung Transplant Patients , 2007 .

[4]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[5]  A. De Vito Dabbs,et al.  Evaluation of the electronic version of the questionnaire for lung transplant patients. , 2007, Progress in transplantation.

[6]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[7]  Shumaila Y. Yousafzai,et al.  Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 2 , 2007 .

[8]  Omer Rana,et al.  Simultaneous trend analysis for evaluating outcomes in patient-centred health monitoring services , 2008, Health care management science.

[9]  Lauren Terhorst,et al.  An Intervention Fidelity Framework for Technology-Based Behavioral Interventions , 2011, Nursing research.

[10]  M. Dew,et al.  Evaluation of a hand‐held, computer‐based intervention to promote early self‐care behaviors after lung transplant , 2009, Clinical transplantation.

[11]  William R. King,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[12]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  Richard J. Holden,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[14]  Ronald E. Anderson ACM code of ethics and professional conduct , 1992, CACM.

[15]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[16]  John C. Norcross,et al.  Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct , 2013 .

[17]  M. Sandelowski,et al.  Development of a tool to assess fidelity to a psycho-educational intervention. , 2010, Journal of advanced nursing.

[18]  C. Spurr,et al.  Informed consent: Patient information forms in chemotherapy trials , 1984, American journal of clinical oncology.

[19]  Annette Devito Dabbs,et al.  Data safety and monitoring for research involving remote health monitoring. , 2011, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[20]  W. Nilsen,et al.  Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? , 2011, Translational behavioral medicine.

[21]  Runze Li,et al.  Design of experiments with multiple independent variables: a resource management perspective on complete and reduced factorial designs. , 2009, Psychological methods.

[22]  Arnold Pacey,et al.  Culture technology , 1986, CABI Compendium.

[23]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[24]  The empowered patient. Preparing for a new patient interaction. , 2010, Journal of AHIMA.

[25]  Josef Stehlik,et al.  The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Twenty-eighth Adult Heart Transplant Report--2011. , 2011, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[26]  P. Munkholm,et al.  Ethical aspects of clinical trials: the attitudes of participants in two non‐cancer trials , 2000, Journal of internal medicine.

[27]  F. Perrone,et al.  Informed versus randomised consent to clinical trials , 1995, The Lancet.

[28]  Charles D. Barrett Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[29]  John E. Ware,et al.  Expanding Patient Involvement in Care , 1985 .

[30]  J. Briceño,et al.  Predicting mortality after lung transplantation. , 2001, Transplantation proceedings.

[31]  P. Munkholm,et al.  Ethical aspects of clinical trials: the attitudes of participants in two non-cancer trials. , 2000 .

[32]  MORAL IMPERATIVES,et al.  ACM code of ethics and professional conduct , 1991, CSOC.

[33]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. , 1985, Annals of internal medicine.

[34]  Neil Postman,et al.  Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology , 1993 .

[35]  S. Reiser,et al.  Medicine and the reign of technology , 1978 .

[36]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[37]  Harry Cayton,et al.  The flat-pack patient? Creating health together. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[38]  S. Murphy,et al.  An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[39]  P. Butow,et al.  Attitudes to randomized clinical trials amongst out‐patients attending a medical oncology clinic , 1999, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[40]  Qingxiong Ma,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Findings , 2004, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[41]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[42]  B. Rounsaville,et al.  A general system for evaluating therapist adherence and competence in psychotherapy research in the addictions. , 2000, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[43]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[44]  B. Lindgren,et al.  Facilitators and barriers to adherence with home monitoring using electronic spirometry. , 2001, AACN clinical issues.

[45]  Donald Gotterbarn,et al.  Using the new ACM code of ethics in decision making , 1993, CACM.

[46]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[47]  S. Murphy,et al.  The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): new methods for more potent eHealth interventions. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[48]  E. Robinson,et al.  The impact of describing clinical trial treatments as new or standard. , 2004, Patient education and counseling.

[49]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[50]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[51]  E. Lusk,et al.  Attitudes toward clinical trials among patients and the public. , 1982, JAMA.

[52]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. , 2001, BMJ.

[53]  Claude Doom,et al.  Usability and acceptance of e-learning in statistics education, based on the compendium platform , 2008 .

[54]  K McPherson,et al.  Incorporating patient preferences into clinical trials , 1998, BMJ.

[55]  Younghwa Lee,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[56]  M. Hagen,et al.  Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[57]  B. Freedman Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.