Quantifying pupillary asymmetry through objective binocular pupillometry in the normal and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) populations

Abstract Introduction: Little is known about human inter-ocular pupillary asymmetry (IOPA). Thus, the purpose of the present investigation was to assess objectively static and dynamic IOPA in normals and in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Methods: The pupillary light reflex (PLR) was assessed in an adult population of normals and in those with mTBI using the Neuroptics DP-2000 binocular pupillometer. Four stimulus conditions were used to optimize the assessment. Two aspects of the pupil were assessed: baseline diameter prior to light stimulation and the dynamic amplitude of constriction following light stimulation. Results: There was no statistical difference in either the static or dynamic IOPA between the two groups. Thus, the data were combined for a better global parameter estimate. The mean average static IOPA was 0.26 mm (SD = ± 0.20 mm) or 4.17% (± 3.29%). The mean average dynamic IOPA was dependent on the light stimulus condition, with the average across all four test conditions being 0.11 mm (± 0.10 mm) or 1.84% (± 1.70%). Discussion: The inter-ocular pupillary effects of mTBI appear to be symmetrical rather than asymmetrical in nature. The findings provide clinicians and researchers a useful quantitative guideline to assess normal vs abnormal static and dynamic inter-ocular pupillary asymmetry (IOPA) in these two populations.

[1]  L. Ie.  Simple central" anisocoria: a common condition, seldom recognized. , 1977 .

[2]  L. Levin.  Neuro-ophthalmologic diagnosis and therapy of central nervous system trauma. , 2004, Ophthalmology clinics of North America.

[3]  N. Zasler.  Visual and Vestibular Consequences of Acquired Brain Injury, by Erwin B. Suchoff, Kenneth Tiuffreda and Neera Kapoor, eds. , 2005 .

[4]  Lawrence Stark,et al.  Functional Analysis of Pupil Nonlinearities , 1968 .

[5]  M. Bradley,et al.  The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[6]  R M Burde,et al.  THE PUPIL , 1967, International ophthalmology clinics.

[7]  K. Ciuffreda,et al.  Pupillary responses to light in chronic non-blast-induced mTBI , 2015, Brain injury.

[8]  H. J. Wyatt,et al.  Anisocoria. Variation and clinical observation with different conditions of illumination and accommodation. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  Donald C Hood,et al.  Toward a clinical protocol for assessing rod, cone, and melanopsin contributions to the human pupil response. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  M. P. Poirier.  Concussions: assessment, management, and recommendations for return to activity , 2003 .

[11]  Lawrence Stark,et al.  Neurological Control Systems: Studies in Bioengineering , 1995 .

[12]  I. E. Loewenfeld.  "Simple central" anisocoria: a common condition, seldom recognized. , 1977, Transactions. Section on Ophthalmology. American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology.

[13]  Ellen Richrer Erringer,et al.  Variation and Ciinical Observation With Different Conditions of Illumination and Accommodation , 1991 .

[14]  L. Press.  Vision Rehabilitation: Multidisciplinary Care of the Patient Following Brain Injury , 2011 .

[15]  N. Newman,et al.  Post-traumatic visual loss. , 2008, Reviews in neurological diseases.

[16]  J. Diamond,et al.  Sclerotomy complications following pars plana vitrectomy , 2000, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  A Kawasaki,et al.  Variability of the relative afferent pupillary defect. , 1996, American journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  H. S. Thompson,et al.  The prevalence of simple anisocoria. , 1987, American journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  Thomas G Urosevich,et al.  Visual dysfunctions and symptoms during the subacute stage of blast-induced mild traumatic brain injury. , 2012, Military medicine.

[20]  S. Wu,et al.  Adler's Physiology of the Eye , 2002 .

[21]  J. Jolles,et al.  Neurocognitive fitness in the sub-acute stage after mild TBI: The effect of age , 2006, Brain injury.

[22]  L. Gray,et al.  Is Pupil Diameter Influenced by Refractive Error? , 2015, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[23]  D. Whitaker,et al.  Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.