Performance analysis of different search algorithms in optimization of power system operation

A Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS) device such as Static Var Compensator (SVC) in a power system improves the voltage profile, reduces power loss and overall cost of the system. To find optimal location and size of the FACTS device, different search algorithms are used. This study focuses on the comparative performance analysis of Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) algorithm to find optimal location and rated value of SVC for the purpose of optimizing total power loss, total cost and improving voltage profile of the power system. Algorithms' computational efficiency is also investigated. To show validity of the proposed techniques, simulations are carried out on IEEE 14 bus and IEEE 57 bus.

[1]  Bashudeb Chandra Ghosh,et al.  Optimization of power system operation with static var compensator applying ACO algorithm , 2014, 2013 International Conference on Electrical Information and Communication Technology (EICT).

[2]  Pierluigi Siano,et al.  Selection of optimal number and location of thyristor-controlled phase shifters using genetic based algorithms , 2004 .

[3]  T. Malakar,et al.  Optimal location and size determination of FACTS devices by using multiobjective optimal power flow , 2010, TENCON 2010 - 2010 IEEE Region 10 Conference.

[4]  Mehmet Tumay,et al.  Mathematical modeling and analysis of a unified power flow controller: A comparison of two approaches in power flow studies and effects of UPFC location , 2007 .

[5]  Mehrdad Ghandhari,et al.  Use of UPFC for optimal power flow control , 1997 .

[6]  G. T. Heydt,et al.  Power flow control and power flow studies for systems with FACTS devices , 1998 .

[7]  Enrique Acha,et al.  A thyristor controlled series compensator model for the power flow solution of practical power networks , 2000 .

[8]  Narain G. Hingorani,et al.  Power electronics in electric utilities: role of power electronics in future power systems , 1988, Proc. IEEE.

[9]  K.Y. Lee,et al.  Static Voltage Stability Margin Enhancement Using STATCOM, TCSC and SSSC , 2005, 2005 IEEE/PES Transmission & Distribution Conference & Exposition: Asia and Pacific.

[10]  Enrique Acha,et al.  FACTS: Modelling and Simulation in Power Networks , 2004 .

[11]  V. Kamaraj,et al.  Enhancement of Voltage Stability by Optimal Location of Static Var Compensator Using Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization , 2012 .

[12]  K. R. Niazi,et al.  Optimal location of FACTS devices for improving performance of the power systems , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[13]  M. Tavakoli Bina,et al.  Simultaneous application of multi-type FACTS devices to the restructured environment: achieving both optimal number and location , 2010 .

[14]  Mehrdad Ghandhari,et al.  Improving power system dynamics by series-connected FACTS devices , 1997 .

[15]  Narayana Prasad Padhy,et al.  Optimal location and controller design of STATCOM for power system stability improvement using PSO , 2008, J. Frankl. Inst..

[16]  S. Bhowmick,et al.  An Indirect UPFC Model to Enhance Reusability of Newton Power-Flow Codes , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[17]  Azah Mohamed,et al.  Optimal placement and sizing of Static Var Compensators in power systems using Improved Harmony Search Algorithm , 2011 .

[18]  S. Gerbex,et al.  Optimal Location of Multi-Type FACTS Devices in a Power System by Means of Genetic Algorithms , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[19]  Rafael Mihalic,et al.  Transient stability assessment of systems comprising phase-shifting FACTS devices by direct methods , 2004 .

[20]  A. Abur,et al.  Static Security Enhancement via Optimal Utilization of Thyristor Controlled Series Capacitors , 2003, IEEE Power Engineering Review.