RBE-LET relationship for the survival of V79 cells irradiated with low energy protons.

The survival of V79 Chinese hamster cells irradiated with proton beams with energies of 0.73, 0.84, 1.16, 1.70 and 3.36 MeV, corresponding to LET values, evaluated at the cell midplane, of 34.5, 30.4, 23.9, 17.8 and 10.6 keV/micron respectively, have been studied in the dose range 0.5-6.0 Gy. As a reference, the survival curve obtained with 200 kV X-rays was used. The initial shoulder, typical of survival curves obtained with sparsely ionizing radiation, decreases as the LET increases and completely disappears at 23.9 keV/micron. This value corresponds to the maximum of the RBE, expressed as the initial slope ratio. In the energy range we have considered, the RBEs for protons are higher than those reported for other ions of comparable LET and the RBE-LET relationship results shifted to lower LET values. Our data seem to indicate that the RBE-LET curve depends on the type of radiation and this could imply that LET is not a good reference for the dose-effectiveness relationship.

[1]  D. E. Watt,et al.  Biophysical Mechanism of Radiation Damage to Mammalian Cells by X- and γ-rays , 1985 .

[2]  C. Geard,et al.  Inactivation of synchronized Chinese Hamster V79 cells with charged-particle track segments. , 1980, Radiation research.

[3]  D. Goodhead,et al.  Inactivation and mutation of cultured mammalian cells by aluminium characteristic ultrasoft X-rays. I. Properties of aluminium X-rays and preliminary experiments with Chinese hamster cells. , 1977, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[4]  D. Goodhead,et al.  Mutation and inactivation of mammalian cells by various ionising radiations , 1977, Nature.

[5]  Joseph F. Janni,et al.  Energy loss, range, path length, time-of-flight, straggling, multiple scattering, and nuclear interaction probability , 1982 .

[6]  C. Tobias The Future of Heavy-Ion Science in Biology and Medicine , 1985 .

[7]  P. R. Bevington,et al.  Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences , 1969 .

[8]  D. Goodhead,et al.  Radiobiology of ultrasoft X rays. I. Cultured hamster cells (V79). , 1987, Radiation research.

[9]  S. B. Field,et al.  The effect of oxygen on impairment of the proliferative capacity of human cells in culture by ionizing radiations of different LET. , 1966, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[10]  D T Goodhead,et al.  Effectiveness of 0.3 keV carbon ultrasoft X-rays for the inactivation and mutation of cultured mammalian cells. , 1979, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[11]  Maria Antonella Tabocchini,et al.  Proton irradiation facility for radiobiological studies at a 7 MV Van de Graaff accelerator , 1987 .

[12]  A. Kellerer,et al.  Criteria for the applicability of LET. , 1975, Radiation research.

[13]  Dudley T. Goodhead,et al.  1 – Relationship of Microdosimetric Techniques to Applications in Biological Systems , 1987 .

[14]  E. Sideris,et al.  Biological effectiveness of low energy protons. I. Survival of Chinese hamster cells. , 1986, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[15]  G. W. Barendsen,et al.  RESPONSES OF CULTURED CELLS, TUMOURS, AND NORMAL TISSUES TO RADIATIONS OF DIFFERENT LINEAR ENERGY TRANSFER. , 1968 .

[16]  J. Lyman,et al.  Inactivation of human kidney cells by high-energy monoenergetic heavy-ion beams. , 1979, Radiation research.

[17]  M Raju,et al.  Heavy Particle Radiotherapy , 1980 .

[18]  M. R. Raju CHAPTER 4 – PROTONS , 1980 .