Dissecting the logical types of network control in gene expression profiles

BackgroundIn the bacterium Escherichia coli the transcriptional regulation of gene expression involves both dedicated regulators binding specific DNA sites with high affinity and also global regulators – abundant DNA architectural proteins of the bacterial nucleoid binding multiple sites with a wide range of affinities and thus modulating the superhelical density of DNA. The first form of transcriptional regulation is predominantly pairwise and specific, representing digitial control, while the second form is (in strength and distribution) continuous, representing analog control.ResultsHere we look at the properties of effective networks derived from significant gene expression changes under variation of the two forms of control and find that upon limitations of one type of control (caused e.g. by mutation of a global DNA architectural factor) the other type can compensate for compromised regulation. Mutations of global regulators significantly enhance the digital control, whereas in the presence of global DNA architectural proteins regulation is mostly of the analog type, coupling spatially neighboring genomic loci. Taken together our data suggest that two logically distinct – digital and analog – types of control are balancing each other.ConclusionBy revealing two distinct logical types of control, our approach provides basic insights into both the organizational principles of transcriptional regulation and the mechanisms buffering genetic flexibility. We anticipate that the general concept of distinguishing logical types of control will apply to many complex biological networks.

[1]  R. Lenski,et al.  Long-Term Experimental Evolution in Escherichia coli. XII. DNA Topology as a Key Target of Selection , 2005, Genetics.

[2]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Genomic analysis of the hierarchical structure of regulatory networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  C. Dorman H-NS: a universal regulator for a dynamic genome , 2004, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[4]  Javier Arsuaga,et al.  Genomic transcriptional response to loss of chromosomal supercoiling in Escherichia coli , 2004, Genome Biology.

[5]  Araceli M. Huerta,et al.  Regulatory network of Escherichia coli: consistency between literature knowledge and microarray profiles. , 2003, Genome research.

[6]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[7]  Markus J. Herrgård,et al.  Reconciling gene expression data with known genome-scale regulatory network structures. , 2003, Genome research.

[8]  F. Baquero,et al.  H-NS and RpoS regulate emergence of Lac Ara+ mutants of Escherichia coli MCS2 , 1997, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  Gregory Bateson,et al.  THE ROLE OF SOMATIC CHANGE IN EVOLUTION , 1963 .

[10]  P. Bork,et al.  Evolution of new protein function: recombinational enhancer Fis originated by horizontal gene transfer from the transcriptional regulator NtrC , 1998, FEBS letters.

[11]  Richard A Stein,et al.  Organization of supercoil domains and their reorganization by transcription , 2005, Molecular microbiology.

[12]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Genomic analysis of regulatory network dynamics reveals large topological changes , 2004, Nature.

[13]  Julio Collado-Vides,et al.  RegulonDB (version 5.0): Escherichia coli K-12 transcriptional regulatory network, operon organization, and growth conditions , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[14]  Andrew Travers,et al.  DNA supercoiling — a global transcriptional regulator for enterobacterial growth? , 2005, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[15]  Jean,et al.  The Computer and the Brain , 1989, Annals of the History of Computing.

[16]  S. Busby,et al.  Association of nucleoid proteins with coding and non-coding segments of the Escherichia coli genome , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  Andrew Travers,et al.  Bacterial chromatin. , 2005, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[18]  N R Cozzarelli,et al.  Topoisomerase IV, not gyrase, decatenates products of site-specific recombination in Escherichia coli. , 1997, Genes & development.

[19]  A I Saeed,et al.  TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. , 2003, BioTechniques.

[20]  C. D. Hardy,et al.  Topological domain structure of the Escherichia coli chromosome. , 2004, Genes & development.

[21]  Marcel Geertz,et al.  Homeostatic regulation of supercoiling sensitivity coordinates transcription of the bacterial genome , 2006, EMBO reports.

[22]  Arkady B Khodursky,et al.  Spatial patterns of transcriptional activity in the chromosome of Escherichia coli , 2004, Genome Biology.

[23]  Daniel Segrè,et al.  Chromosomal periodicity of evolutionarily conserved gene pairs , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  C. D. Hardy,et al.  A genetic selection for supercoiling mutants of Escherichia coli reveals proteins implicated in chromosome structure , 2005, Molecular microbiology.

[25]  François Képès,et al.  Periodic transcriptional organization of the E.coli genome. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  Richard E. Lenski,et al.  Experimental Tests for an Evolutionary Trade‐Off between Growth Rate and Yield in E. coli , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[27]  C. Dorman H-NS, the genome sentinel , 2007, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[28]  G. Church,et al.  A computational analysis of whole-genome expression data reveals chromosomal domains of gene expression , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[29]  Bernhard O. Palsson,et al.  Long-Range Periodic Patterns in Microbial Genomes Indicate Significant Multi-Scale Chromosomal Organization , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[30]  R. Lenski,et al.  The population genetics of ecological specialization in evolving Escherichia coli populations , 2000, Nature.

[31]  George M Church,et al.  A microarray-based antibiotic screen identifies a regulatory role for supercoiling in the osmotic stress response of Escherichia coli. , 2003, Genome research.