Illustration of Different Disease Transmission Routes in a Pig Trade Network by Monopartite and Bipartite Representation

Simple Summary Besides direct animal movements between farms; indirect transmission routes of pathogens can have an immense impact on network structure and disease spread in animal trade networks. This study integrated these indirect transmission routes between farms via transport companies or feed supply as bipartite networks; which were compared to the monopartite animal movements network representing the direct transmission route. Both bipartite networks were projected on farm level to enable a comparison to the monopartite network. The number of edges increased immensely from the monopartite animal movements network to both projected networks. Thus, farms can be highly connected over indirect connections, although they are not directly trading animals. The ranking of the animals according to their centrality parameters, indicating their importance for the network, showed moderate correlations only between the animal movements and the transportation network. The epidemiological models based on the different network representations revealed significantly more infected farms for the networks including indirect transmission routes compared to the direct animal movements. Indirect transmission routes had an immense impact on the outcome of centrality parameters, as well as on the spreading process within the network. This knowledge is needed to understand disease spread and to establish reliable prevention and control measurements. Abstract Besides the direct transport of animals, also indirect transmission routes, e.g., contact via contaminated vehicles, have to be considered. In this study, the transmission routes of a German pig trade network were illustrated as a monopartite animal movements network and two bipartite networks including information of the transport company and the feed producer which were projected on farm level (n = 866) to enable a comparison. The networks were investigated with the help of network analysis and formed the basis for epidemiological models to evaluate the impact of different transmission routes on network structure as well as on potential epidemic sizes. The number of edges increased immensely from the monopartite animal movements network to both projected networks. The median centrality parameters revealed clear differences between the three representations. Furthermore, moderate correlation coefficients ranging from 0.55 to 0.68 between the centrality values of the animal movements network and the projected transportation network were obtained. The epidemiological models revealed significantly more infected farms for both projected networks (70% to 100%) compared to the animal movements network (1%). The inclusion of indirect transmission routes had an immense impact on the outcome of centrality parameters as well as on the results of the epidemiological models.

[1]  Igor M. Sokolov,et al.  Unfolding accessibility provides a macroscopic approach to temporal networks , 2012, Physical review letters.

[2]  Clifford M. Hurvich,et al.  Regression and time series model selection in small samples , 1989 .

[3]  Kimberly VanderWaal,et al.  Role of animal movement and indirect contact among farms in transmission of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus , 2018, Epidemics.

[4]  G. Schwarz.  Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[5]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Characterization of contact structures for the spread of infectious diseases in a pork supply chain in northern Germany by dynamic network analysis of yearly and monthly networks. , 2015, Transboundary and emerging diseases.

[6]  C Dubé,et al.  Estimating potential epidemic size following introduction of a long-incubation disease in scale-free connected networks of milking-cow movements in Ontario, Canada. , 2011, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[7]  A. Bernstein,et al.  The pig transport network in Switzerland: Structure, patterns, and implications for the transmission of infectious diseases between animal holdings , 2019, PloS one.

[8]  Luca Bolzoni,et al.  The Potential Role of Direct and Indirect Contacts on Infection Spread in Dairy Farm Networks , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  Aric Hagberg,et al.  Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function using NetworkX , 2008, Proceedings of the Python in Science Conference.

[10]  The effects of structural change in agriculture on the spread of animal disease in Finland , 2015 .

[11]  A. de Kruif,et al.  An experimental infection to investigate the indirect transmission of classical swine fever virus by excretions of infected pigs. , 2002, Journal of veterinary medicine. B, Infectious diseases and veterinary public health.

[12]  M. Keeling,et al.  Contact structure and Salmonella control in the network of pig movements in France. , 2011, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[13]  B. Durand,et al.  Structural vulnerability of the French swine industry trade network to the spread of infectious diseases. , 2012, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[14]  ZiNan Chang,et al.  Epidemic spreading in weighted homogeneous networks with community structure , 2014 .

[15]  Jenny Frössling,et al.  Application of network analysis parameters in risk-based surveillance – Examples based on cattle trade data and bovine infections in Sweden , 2012, Preventive Veterinary Medicine.

[16]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Efficient Interruption of Infection Chains by Targeted Removal of Central Holdings in an Animal Trade Network , 2013, PloS one.

[17]  M. Gilbert,et al.  Cattle movements and bovine tuberculosis in Great Britain , 2005, Nature.

[18]  F. Natale,et al.  Network analysis of Italian cattle trade patterns and evaluation of risks for potential disease spread. , 2009, Preventive Veterinary Medicine.

[19]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[20]  Scott Dee,et al.  An assessment of sanitation protocols for commercial transport vehicles contaminated with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. , 2004, Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire.

[21]  Graham W. Taylor,et al.  Dynamic contact networks of swine movement in Manitoba, Canada: Characterization and implications for infectious disease spread. , 2019, Transboundary and Emerging Diseases.

[22]  Matthias Greiner,et al.  Relationship of trade patterns of the Danish swine industry animal movements network to potential disease spread. , 2007, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[23]  Morgane Salines,et al.  Pig movements in France: Designing network models fitting the transmission route of pathogens , 2017, PloS one.

[24]  P. Holme,et al.  Predicting and controlling infectious disease epidemics using temporal networks , 2013, F1000prime reports.

[25]  M C M de Jong,et al.  Rate of inter-herd transmission of classical swine fever virus by different types of contact during the 1997–8 epidemic in The Netherlands , 2002, Epidemiology and Infection.

[26]  R. Christley,et al.  Exploring the role of auction markets in cattle movements within Great Britain. , 2007, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[27]  A de Kruif,et al.  Transmission of classical swine fever. A review , 2004, The Veterinary quarterly.

[28]  R. Christley,et al.  Infection in social networks: using network analysis to identify high-risk individuals. , 2005, American journal of epidemiology.

[29]  I Traulsen,et al.  Epidemic Spreading in an Animal Trade Network - Comparison of Distance-Based and Network-Based Control Measures. , 2016, Transboundary and emerging diseases.

[30]  J Krieter,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of classical swine fever epidemics and control. II. Validation of the model. , 2005, Veterinary microbiology.

[31]  B. Martínez-López,et al.  A novel spatial and stochastic model to evaluate the within- and between-farm transmission of classical swine fever virus. I. General concepts and description of the model. , 2011, Veterinary microbiology.

[32]  Javier Sanchez,et al.  Development of a network based model to simulate the between-farm transmission of the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. , 2015, Veterinary microbiology.

[33]  J Krieter,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of classical swine fever epidemics and control. I. General concepts and description of the model. , 2005, Veterinary microbiology.

[34]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Static network analysis of a pork supply chain in Northern Germany-Characterisation of the potential spread of infectious diseases via animal movements. , 2013, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[35]  M. Nöremark,et al.  Network analysis of cattle and pig movements in Sweden: measures relevant for disease control and risk based surveillance. , 2011, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[36]  S. Holm.  A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[37]  Luca Bolzoni,et al.  When resolution does matter: Modelling indirect contacts in dairy farms at different levels of detail , 2019, PloS one.

[38]  Ruth H. Livingston.  An Introduction , 2019, Contemporary Psychoanalysis.

[39]  M. Bigras-Poulin,et al.  Network analysis of Danish cattle industry trade patterns as an evaluation of risk potential for disease spread. , 2006, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[40]  Philipp Hövel,et al.  Disease Spread through Animal Movements: A Static and Temporal Network Analysis of Pig Trade in Germany , 2016, PloS one.

[41]  A. A. Dijkhuizen,et al.  Introduction of contagious animal diseases into The Netherlands: elicitation of expert opinions , 1998 .

[42]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in very large networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[43]  R. Christley,et al.  Direct and indirect contacts between cattle farms in north-west England. , 2008, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[44]  Jenny Frössling,et al.  A survey of visitors on Swedish livestock farms with reference to the spread of animal diseases , 2013, BMC Veterinary Research.

[45]  L. Danon,et al.  Demographic structure and pathogen dynamics on the network of livestock movements in Great Britain , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  C. Staubach,et al.  Epidemiology of classical swine fever in Germany in the 1990s. , 2000, Veterinary microbiology.

[47]  Zvonimir Poljak,et al.  Epidemiological investigations in regard to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) in Quebec, Canada. Part 1: biosecurity practices and their geographical distribution in two areas of different swine density. , 2012, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[48]  Nicholas J. Savill,et al.  Sheep Movement Networks and the Transmission of Infectious Diseases , 2010, PloS one.

[49]  S. Borgatti.  The Key Player Problem , 2002 .

[50]  N Toft,et al.  Comparing the epidemiological and economic effects of control strategies against classical swine fever in Denmark. , 2009, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[51]  Mark C Thurmond,et al.  Description of an epidemic simulation model for use in evaluating strategies to control an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease. , 2003, American journal of veterinary research.

[52]  C W Revie,et al.  Analysis of Swine Movement in Four Canadian Regions: Network Structure and Implications for Disease Spread. , 2016, Transboundary and emerging diseases.

[53]  A. de Kruif,et al.  Type and frequency of contacts between Belgian pig herds. , 2009, Preventive veterinary medicine.