Bending the curve: the recent marked slowdown in growth of noninvasive diagnostic imaging.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to determine whether there has been any change in the rapid growth pattern that has characterized noninvasive diagnostic imaging in recent years. MATERIALS AND METHODS The annual nationwide Medicare Part B databases were used. All Current Procedural Terminology codes for discretionary noninvasive diagnostic imaging were identified. The overall utilization rates per 1,000 fee-for-service beneficiaries were calculated from 1998 through 2008, as were rates by modality. Determination was made as to whether studies were interpreted by radiologists or nonradiologist physicians. RESULTS The total utilization rate of noninvasive diagnostic imaging grew at a compound annual growth rate of 4.1% from 1998 to 2005, but this decreased to 1.4% from 2005 to 2008. From 2005 through 2008, the overall growth trends flattened dramatically for MRI and nuclear medicine and abated somewhat for CT, ultrasound, and echocardiography. In ambulatory settings, flattening of the advanced imaging growth curves was seen in both private offices and hospital outpatient facilities. From 1998 to 2005, the compound annual growth rate was 3.4% among radiologists and 6.6% among nonradiologist physicians. From 2005 to 2008, the compound annual growth rate decreased to 0.8% among radiologists and 1.8% among nonradiologists. CONCLUSION There has been a distinct slowing in the growth of discretionary noninvasive diagnostic imaging in the Medicare fee-for-service population since 2005. The slowdown has been most pronounced in MRI and nuclear medicine. This should allay some of the concerns of policymakers and payers. Both before and after 2005, growth was approximately twice as rapid among nonradiologist physicians as among radiologists.

[1]  T. Tosteson,et al.  Growth in the use of PET for six cancer types after coverage by medicare: additive or replacement? , 2012, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[2]  J. Beitler.  American college of radiology appropriateness criteria. , 2011, Oral oncology.

[3]  J. Iglehart.  Health insurers and medical-imaging policy--a work in progress. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  J. T. Martin.  Report to the Congress , 1964 .

[5]  Laurence Parker,et al.  Trends in the utilization of outpatient advanced imaging after the deficit reduction act. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[6]  P. Alagona,et al.  The worldwide environment of cardiovascular disease: prevalence, diagnosis, therapy, and policy issues: a report from the American College of Cardiology. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  D. Friedman,et al.  Variability in study withdrawal rates among academic neuroradiologists participating in a radiology utilization management program. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[9]  J. Jarvik,et al.  Evidence-based imaging and effective utilization: lessons in neuroradiology. , 2012, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[10]  D. Berman,et al.  ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Associa , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  R. Gibbons,et al.  The year in cardiac imaging. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  H. Forman,et al.  Deficit reduction act: effects on utilization of noninvasive musculoskeletal imaging. , 2012, Radiology.

[13]  Laurence Parker,et al.  Noncardiac point-of-care ultrasound by nonradiologist physicians: how widespread is it? , 2011, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[14]  Donald L. Miller,et al.  Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures , 2012, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[15]  Laurence Parker,et al.  The recent downturn in utilization of CT: the start of a new trend? , 2012, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[16]  Manesh R. Patel,et al.  ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[17]  R. Hendel,et al.  The time and place for appropriate radionuclide imaging: Now and everywhere , 2011, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[18]  M. Dolich,et al.  A comparison of thoracic CT and abdominal CT for the identification of thoracic blunt trauma. , 2012, American journal of surgery.

[19]  A. Winter,et al.  Paying accurately for imaging services in medicare. , 2008, Health affairs.

[20]  A. Einstein.  Radiation protection of patients undergoing cardiac computed tomographic angiography. , 2009, JAMA.

[21]  J. Itri,et al.  Identifying benchmarks for discrepancy rates in preliminary interpretations provided by radiology trainees at an academic institution. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[22]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system. , 2008, Health affairs.

[23]  L. Tanoue.  Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure , 2009 .

[24]  D. Levin,et al.  Recent payment and utilization trends in radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging: comparison between self-referral and referral to radiologists. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[25]  A. Elster.  Turf Wars In Radiology: Recent Actions Against Self-Referral by State Governments, Commercial Payers, and Medicare—Hope Is on the Horizon , 2009 .