BACKGROUND
Although fluoxetine is the most frequently prescribed antidepressant drug in the United States, its safety in pregnant women has not been established.
METHODS
From 1989 through 1995, we prospectively identified 228 pregnant women taking fluoxetine. We compared the outcomes of their pregnancies with those of 254 women identified in a similar manner who were not taking fluoxetine.
RESULTS
The rate of spontaneous pregnancy loss did not differ significantly between the women treated with fluoxetine and the control women (10.5 percent and 9.1 percent, respectively), nor was the rate of major structural anomalies significantly different (5.5 percent vs. 4.0 percent). Among the 97 infants exposed to fluoxetine who were evaluated for minor anomalies, the incidence of three or more minor anomalies was significantly higher than among 153 similarly examined control infants (15.5 percent vs. 6.5 percent, P=0.03). As compared with the 101 infants exposed to fluoxetine only during the first and second trimesters, the 73 infants exposed during the third trimester had higher rates of premature delivery (relative risk, 4.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 20.8), admission to special-care nurseries (relative risk, 2.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 6.9), and poor neonatal adaptation, including respiratory difficulty, cyanosis on feeding, and jitteriness (relative risk, 8.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.9 to 26.6). Birth weight was also lower and birth length shorter in infants exposed fluoxetine late in gestation.
CONCLUSION
Women who take fluoxetine during pregnancy do not have an increased risk of spontaneous pregnancy loss or major fetal anomalies, but women who take fluoxetine in the third trimester are at increased risk for perinatal complications.
[1]
D. Goldstein,et al.
Effects of third trimester fluoxetine exposure on the newborn.
,
1995,
Journal of clinical psychopharmacology.
[2]
F. Rosa.
AbstractMedicaid antidepressant pregnancy exposure outcomes
,
1994
.
[3]
C. Vorhees,et al.
A developmental neurotoxicity evaluation of the effects of prenatal exposure to fluoxetine in rats.
,
1994,
Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.
[4]
G. Koren,et al.
Pregnancy outcome following first-trimester exposure to fluoxetine (Prozac)
,
1993,
JAMA.
[5]
M. Walsh-sukys,et al.
Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn: The Black Box Revisited
,
1993
.
[6]
M. Werler,et al.
Predictive value of minor anomalies. I. Association with major malformations.
,
1987,
The Journal of pediatrics.
[7]
B. Abrams,et al.
Prepregnancy weight, weight gain, and birth weight.
,
1986,
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[8]
W M Moore,et al.
Physical growth: National Center for Health Statistics percentiles.
,
1979,
The American journal of clinical nutrition.
[9]
David W. Smith,et al.
Congenital anomalies in the newborninfant, including minor variations
,
1964
.
[10]
G. Berkowitz,et al.
Epidemiology of preterm birth.
,
1993,
Epidemiologic reviews.
[11]
August B. Hollingshead,et al.
Two Factor Index of Social Position
,
1957
.