Altered nanofeature size dictates stem cell differentiation

The differentiation of stem cells can be modulated by physical factors such as the micro- and nano-topography of the extracellular matrix. One important goal in stem cell research is to understand the concept that directs differentiation into a specific cell lineage in the nanoscale environment. Here, we demonstrate that such paths exist by controlling only the micro- and nano-topography of polymer surfaces. Altering the depth (on a nanometric scale) of micro-patterned surface structures allowed increased adhesion of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) with specific differentiation into osteoblasts, in the absence of osteogenic medium. Small (10 nm) depth patterns promoted cell adhesion without noticeable differentiation, whereas larger depth patterns (100 nm) elicited a collective cell organization, which induced selective differentiation into osteoblast-like cells. This latter response was dictated by stress through focal-adhesion-induced reorganization of F-actin filaments. The results have significant implications for understanding the architectural effects of the in vivo microenvironment and also for the therapeutic use of stem cells.

[1]  J. Hubbell,et al.  An RGD spacing of 440 nm is sufficient for integrin alpha V beta 3- mediated fibroblast spreading and 140 nm for focal contact and stress fiber formation , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[2]  Taekjip Ha,et al.  Measuring mechanical tension across vinculin reveals regulation of focal adhesion dynamics , 2010, Nature.

[3]  Fei Wang,et al.  Material Properties of the Cell Dictate Stress-induced Spreading and Differentiation in Embryonic Stem Cells Growing Evidence Suggests That Physical Microenvironments and Mechanical Stresses, in Addition to Soluble Factors, Help Direct Mesenchymal-stem-cell Fate. However, Biological Responses to a L , 2022 .

[4]  G. Pastorin,et al.  Thin films of functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes as suitable scaffold materials for stem cells proliferation and bone formation. , 2010, ACS Nano.

[5]  R. Bareille,et al.  Role of neural-cadherin in early osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells cocultured with human umbilical vein endothelial cells. , 2010, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[6]  F. Guillemot,et al.  Cyclo-(DfKRG) peptide grafting onto Ti-6Al-4V: physical characterization and interest towards human osteoprogenitor cells adhesion. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[7]  F. MacKintosh,et al.  Nonequilibrium Mechanics of Active Cytoskeletal Networks , 2007, Science.

[8]  D. Mooney,et al.  Combined Angiogenic and Osteogenic Factor Delivery Enhances Bone Marrow Stromal Cell‐Driven Bone Regeneration , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Stretching Single Talin Rod Molecules Activates Vinculin Binding , 2009, Science.

[10]  Gabriela Kalna,et al.  Nanotopographical stimulation of mechanotransduction and changes in interphase centromere positioning , 2007, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[11]  Z. Chang,et al.  Spata4 promotes osteoblast differentiation through Erk‐activated Runx2 pathway , 2011, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  D. E. Discher,et al.  Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage — Soluble factors that limit osteogenesis , 2009 .

[13]  R. Oreffo,et al.  Osteoprogenitor response to semi-ordered and random nanotopographies. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[14]  Sungho Jin,et al.  Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  G. Fechine,et al.  Surface characterization of photodegraded poly(ethylene terephthalate). The effect of ultraviolet absorbers , 2004 .

[16]  D. Mooney,et al.  Bone regeneration in a rat cranial defect with delivery of PEI-condensed plasmid DNA encoding for bone morphogenetic protein-4 (BMP-4) , 2005, Gene Therapy.

[17]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[18]  Patrik Schmuki,et al.  Nanosize and vitality: TiO2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. , 2007, Nano letters.

[19]  The soft framework of the cellular machine , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[21]  A. Páldi,et al.  Bistable Cell Fate Specification as a Result of Stochastic Fluctuations and Collective Spatial Cell Behaviour , 2010, PloS one.

[22]  T. Webster,et al.  Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[23]  Flemming Besenbacher,et al.  Fibronectin adsorption, cell adhesion, and proliferation on nanostructured tantalum surfaces. , 2010, ACS nano.

[24]  Kimiko Yamamoto,et al.  Fluid shear stress induces differentiation of Flk-1-positive embryonic stem cells into vascular endothelial cells in vitro. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[25]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. , 2007, Nature materials.

[26]  G. Pharr,et al.  An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments , 1992 .

[27]  Alain Guignandon,et al.  The effect of RGD density on osteoblast and endothelial cell behavior on RGD-grafted polyethylene terephthalate surfaces. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[28]  J. Ringe,et al.  Priming integrin α5 promotes human mesenchymal stromal cell osteoblast differentiation and osteogenesis , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  M. Stojkovic,et al.  Downregulation of Multiple Stress Defense Mechanisms During Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2008, Stem cells.

[30]  M. Kassem,et al.  Heat Shock–Induced Enhancement of Osteoblastic Differentiation of hTERT‐Immortalized Mesenchymal Stem Cells , 2006, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[31]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Collective cell guidance by cooperative intercellular forces , 2010, Nature materials.

[32]  A. Curtis,et al.  CONTROL OF CELL BEHAVIOR: TOPOLOGICAL FACTORS. , 1964, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[33]  Kyucheol Cho,et al.  Inhibition of Wnt signaling by the osteoblast-specific transcription factor Osterix , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  B. Guillotin,et al.  Differentiation of pre-osteoblast cells on poly(ethylene terephthalate) grafted with RGD and/or BMPs mimetic peptides. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[35]  Linhong Deng,et al.  Universal physical responses to stretch in the living cell , 2007, Nature.

[36]  Wei Wang,et al.  Two‐step photodegradation process of poly(ethylene terephthalate) , 1999 .

[37]  Ivan Martin,et al.  The FASEB Journal express article 10.1096/fj.01-0656fje. Published online December 28, 2001. Cell differentiation by mechanical stress , 2022 .

[38]  J. Ringe,et al.  Priming integrin alpha5 promotes human mesenchymal stromal cell osteoblast differentiation and osteogenesis , 2009 .