Effects of Cervical Cages on Load Distribution of Cancellous Core: A Finite Element Analysis

Methods: The study was 1 designed to analyze the load distribution of the cancellous core after implantation of vertical ring cages made of titanium, cortical bone, and tantalum using the finite element (FE) method. The intact FE model of C5–C6 motion segment was validated with experimental results. Results: The percentage of load distribution in cancellous core dropped by about one-third of the level for the intact model after the cage implantation. The difference among cages made of different materials (or different stiffnesses) was not very obvious. Conclusions: These results implied that the influence of the cage on the load transfer in the cancellous core is greatly related to the cage’s dimensions and position within the intervertebral space. The dimension and position of the cage that least disturb the load distribution in cancellous core could be criteria in cage development.

[1]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Biomechanics of the cervical spine Part 2. Cervical spine soft tissue responses and biomechanical modeling. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  K. Kaneda,et al.  In vitro biomechanical investigation of the stability and stress-shielding effect of lumbar interbody fusion devices. , 2000, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  L. Claes,et al.  Primary stabilizing effect of interbody fusion devices for the cervical spine: an in vitro comparison between three different cage types and bone cement , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[4]  M. Panjabi.  Cervical Spine Models for Biomechanical Research , 1998, Spine.

[5]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Finite element modeling of the C4-C6 cervical spine unit. , 1996, Medical engineering & physics.

[6]  A. Thambyah,et al.  Influence of PLIF Cage Size on Lumbar Spine Stability , 2000, Spine.

[7]  J P Paul,et al.  Finite element stress analysis of a cadaver second cervical vertebra. , 1994, Medical & biological engineering & computing.

[8]  Stephen M. Klisch,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of Multilevel Fixation Methods in the Lumbar Spine , 1997, Spine.

[9]  W C Hayes,et al.  Variations of stiffness and strength along the human cervical spine. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  G B Andersson,et al.  Anterior Cervical Fusion: A Finite Element Model Study on Motion Segment Stability Including the Effect of Osteoporosis , 2000, Spine.

[11]  A. Schultz,et al.  Load-displacement properties of lower cervical spine motion segments. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Vijay K. Goel,et al.  Impact Response of the Intervertebral Disc in a Finite-Element Model , 2000, Spine.

[13]  Thomas Mittlmeier,et al.  Influence of cage design on interbody fusion in a sheep cervical spine model. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[14]  B. Weiner,et al.  Lumbar Interbody Cages , 1998, Spine.

[15]  L. Claes,et al.  Effects of neck movements on stability and subsidence in cervical interbody fusion: an in vitro study. , 2001, Journal of neurosurgery.

[16]  R. Robinson,et al.  The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. , 1958, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  V. Goel,et al.  Prediction of Load Sharing Among Spinal Components of a C5‐C6 Motion Segment Using the Finite Element Approach , 1998, Spine.

[18]  M. Aebi,et al.  Cages: designs and concepts , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[19]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Finite element analysis of anterior cervical spine interbody fusion. , 1997, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[20]  N P Haas,et al.  Biomechanical Comparison of Cervical Spine Interbody Fusion Cages , 2001, Spine.

[21]  G. Bagby.  Arthrodesis by the distraction-compression method using a stainless steel implant. , 1988, Orthopedics.

[22]  Michael Kleinberger,et al.  Application of Finite Element Techniques to the Study of Cervical Spine Mechanics , 1993 .

[23]  M Nissan,et al.  A Study of Vertebra and Disc Geometric Relations of the Human Cervical and Lumbar Spine , 1986, Spine.

[24]  D N Kunz,et al.  Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Biomechanical Comparison, Including a New Threaded Cage , 1997, Spine.

[25]  G. Bagby,et al.  Cervical vertebral interbody fusion in the horse: a comparative study of bovine xenografts and autografts supported by stainless steel baskets. , 1984, American journal of veterinary research.

[26]  A. Tencer,et al.  Biomechanical Properties of Threaded Inserts for Lumbar Interbody Spinal Fusion , 1995, Spine.

[27]  L. Claes,et al.  Subsidence Resulting From Simulated Postoperative Neck Movements: An In Vitro Investigation With a New Cervical Fusion Cage , 2000, Spine.

[28]  M. Markel,et al.  Cervical Interbody Fusion Cages: An Animal Model With and Without Bone Morphogenetic Protein , 1998, Spine.

[29]  F Lavaste,et al.  A three-dimensional parameterized finite element model of the lower cervical spine. Study of the influence of the posterior articular facets. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  N. Yoganandan,et al.  Finite element applications in human cervical spine modeling. , 1996, Spine.

[31]  N Bogduk,et al.  The ligaments and annulus fibrosus of human adult cervical intervertebral discs. , 1999, Spine.

[32]  J. Lemaire,et al.  Interleukin-6 overexpression as a marker of malignancy in human gliomas. , 2001, Journal of neurosurgery.

[33]  E. Teo,et al.  Evaluation of the role of ligaments, facets and disc nucleus in lower cervical spine under compression and sagittal moments using finite element method. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.