The impacts of an invasive species citizen science training program on participant attitudes, behavior, and science literacy

Citizen science can make major contributions to informal science education by targeting participants’ attitudes and knowledge about science while changing human behavior towards the environment. We examined how training associated with an invasive species citizen science program affected participants in these areas. We found no changes in science literacy or overall attitudes between tests administered just before and after a one-day training program, matching results from other studies. However, we found improvements in science literacy and knowledge using context-specific measures and in self-reported intention to engage in pro-environmental activities. While we noted modest change in knowledge and attitudes, we found comparison and interpretation of these data difficult in the absence of other studies using similar measures. We suggest that alternative survey instruments are needed and should be calibrated appropriately to the pre-existing attitudes, behavior, and levels of knowledge in these relatively sophisticated target groups.

[1]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science , 2002 .

[2]  Christine M. Cunningham,et al.  Invasion Ecology. Student Edition. Cornell Scientific Inquiry Series. , 2003 .

[3]  Melinda Laituri,et al.  The art and science of multi-scale citizen science support , 2011, Ecol. Informatics.

[4]  G. Ruiz,et al.  Exotic insects and their pathways for invasion , 2003 .

[5]  R. Bonney,et al.  Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project , 2005 .

[6]  Brain Wynne,et al.  Public understanding of science research: new horizons or hall of mirrors? , 1992 .

[7]  Thomas J. Stohlgren,et al.  Improving and integrating data on invasive species collected by citizen scientists , 2010, Biological Invasions.

[8]  Martin W. Bauer,et al.  What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda , 2007 .

[9]  Kristine F. Stepenuck,et al.  Volunteer Stream Monitoring and Local Participation in Natural Resource Issues , 2004 .

[10]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Misunderstanding science?: Misunderstood misunderstandings: social identities and public uptake of science , 1996 .

[11]  B. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1966 .

[12]  Kristin Shrader-Frechette,et al.  Nonindigenous Species: Ecological Explanation, Environmental Ethics, and Public Policy , 2003 .

[13]  P. Tuss.  From Student to Scientist , 1996 .

[14]  Va Arlington.  National Science Board. , 2010 .

[15]  Keith R Hayes,et al.  Biological invasions: recommendations for U.S. policy and management. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[16]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[17]  Jon D. Miller.  Public Understanding of, and Attitudes toward, Scientific Research: What We Know and What We Need to Know , 2004 .

[18]  R. Bonney,et al.  Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen‐science project , 2000 .

[19]  M. Lombard,et al.  Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability , 2002 .

[20]  Ann B. Messmore.  Measuring the Impact of Grassroots Outreach , 1996 .

[21]  R. Driver,et al.  Young people's images of science , 1996 .

[22]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science , 1992 .

[23]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The “New Environmental Paradigm” , 1978 .

[24]  J. Silvertown.  A new dawn for citizen science. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  J. Cohn.  Citizen Science: Can Volunteers Do Real Research? , 2008 .

[26]  David N. Bonter,et al.  Citizen Science as an Ecological Research Tool: Challenges and Benefits , 2010 .

[27]  Robert R Parmenter,et al.  The spread of invasive species and infectious disease as drivers of ecosystem change , 2008 .

[28]  A pragmatic epistemology for free‐choice learning , 2005 .

[29]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States , 2005 .

[30]  Charles Luckmann,et al.  Defining Experiential Education , 1996 .

[31]  R. Cronje,et al.  Does Participation in Citizen Science Improve Scientific Literacy? A Study to Compare Assessment Methods , 2011 .

[32]  Candie C. Wilderman,et al.  Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. , 2009 .

[33]  Thomas J. Stohlgren,et al.  The Art and Science of Weed Mapping , 2007, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[34]  B. Lewenstein,et al.  Creating Connections Museums and the Public Understanding of Current Research , 2004 .

[35]  Klaus krippendorff,et al.  Measuring the Reliability of Qualitative Text Analysis Data , 2004 .

[36]  Audrey B. Champagne,et al.  The National Science Education Standards. , 2000 .

[37]  Janet L Finn Msw,et al.  The Promise of Participatory Research , 2008 .

[38]  John H. Falk,et al.  Free‐choice environmental learning: framing the discussion , 2005 .

[39]  A. Gross.  The roles of rhetoric in the public understanding of science , 1994 .

[40]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[41]  Lynn D. Dierking,et al.  Investigating public science interest and understanding: evidence for the importance of free-choice learning , 2007 .

[42]  R. Bonney,et al.  Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy , 2009 .

[43]  R. Bonney,et al.  Citizen Science as a Tool for Conservation in Residential Ecosystems , 2007 .

[44]  J. Lagowski.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[45]  J. Durant,et al.  The public understanding of science , 1989, Nature.

[46]  G. Hein.  Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits , 2009 .

[47]  L. Dierking,et al.  Lessons without limit: how free-choice learning is transforming science and technology education. , 2005, Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos.

[48]  Stephen Lacy,et al.  Sampling Error and Selecting Intercoder Reliability Samples for Nominal Content Categories , 1996 .

[49]  R. Dunlap,et al.  THE NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PARADIGM: 5 PROPOSED MEASURING INSTRUMENT AND PRELIMINARY RESULTS , 1978 .

[50]  Thomas J. Stohlgren,et al.  Assessing citizen science data quality: an invasive species case study , 2011 .

[51]  R. Jordan,et al.  Knowledge Gain and Behavioral Change in Citizen‐Science Programs , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[52]  D. Simberloff,et al.  BIOTIC INVASIONS: CAUSES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES, AND CONTROL , 2000 .

[53]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches , 1981 .