The same number of optimized parameters scheme for determining intermolecular interaction energies.

We propose the Same Number Of Optimized Parameters (SNOOP) scheme as an alternative to the counterpoise method for treating basis set superposition errors in calculations of intermolecular interaction energies. The key point of the SNOOP scheme is to enforce that the number of optimized wave function parameters for the noninteracting system is the same as for the interacting system. This ensures a delicate balance between the quality of the monomer and dimer finite basis set calculations. We compare the SNOOP scheme to the uncorrected and counterpoise schemes theoretically as well as numerically. Numerical results for second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) and coupled-cluster with single, double, and approximate triple excitations (CCSD(T)) show that the SNOOP scheme in general outperforms the uncorrected and counterpoise approaches. Furthermore, we show that SNOOP interaction energies calculated using a given basis set are of similar quality as those determined by basis set extrapolation of counterpoise-corrected results obtained at a similar computational cost.

[1]  M. Plesset,et al.  Note on an Approximation Treatment for Many-Electron Systems , 1934 .

[2]  J. Noga,et al.  Second-order BSSE-free perturbation theory: intermolecular interactions within supermolecular approach , 1991 .

[3]  Steve Scheiner,et al.  Calculating the Properties of Hydrogen Bonds by ab Initio Methods , 1991 .

[4]  Maciej Gutowski,et al.  Weak interactions between small systems. Models for studying the nature of intermolecular forces and challenging problems for ab initio calculations , 1988 .

[5]  M. Gutowski,et al.  Critical evaluation of some computational approaches to the problem of basis set superposition error , 1993 .

[6]  F. B. van Duijneveldt,et al.  Weakly Bonded Systems , 2007 .

[7]  T. H. Dunning.  Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen , 1989 .

[8]  M. Gutowski,et al.  THE BASIS SET SUPERPOSITION ERROR IN CORRELATED ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE CALCULATIONS , 1986 .

[9]  P. Claverie,et al.  Perturbative ab initio calculations of intermolecular energies. I. Method , 1974 .

[10]  S. Grimme,et al.  A geometrical correction for the inter- and intra-molecular basis set superposition error in Hartree-Fock and density functional theory calculations for large systems. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[11]  S. F. Boys,et al.  The calculation of small molecular interactions by the differences of separate total energies. Some procedures with reduced errors , 1970 .

[12]  Roland Lindh,et al.  The water dimer interaction energy: Convergence to the basis set limit at the correlated level , 1997 .

[13]  J. V. Lenthe,et al.  Ab initio calculations on weakly bonded systems , 1984 .

[14]  Trygve Helgaker,et al.  A systematic ab initio study of the water dimer in hierarchies of basis sets and correlation models , 1997 .

[15]  Trygve Helgaker,et al.  Basis-set convergence in correlated calculations on Ne, N2, and H2O , 1998 .

[16]  Manoj K. Kesharwani,et al.  Some Observations on Counterpoise Corrections for Explicitly Correlated Calculations on Noncovalent Interactions. , 2014, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[17]  Maciej Gutowski,et al.  Accuracy of the Boys and Bernardi function counterpoise method , 1993 .

[18]  Robert Moszynski,et al.  Perturbation Theory Approach to Intermolecular Potential Energy Surfaces of van der Waals Complexes , 1994 .

[19]  Lori A Burns,et al.  Comparing Counterpoise-Corrected, Uncorrected, and Averaged Binding Energies for Benchmarking Noncovalent Interactions. , 2014, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[20]  Edward G Hohenstein,et al.  An assessment of theoretical methods for nonbonded interactions: comparison to complete basis set limit coupled-cluster potential energy curves for the benzene dimer, the methane dimer, benzene-methane, and benzene-H2S. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[21]  J. Cullen.  An examination of the effects of basis set and charge transfer in hydrogen-bonded dimers with a constrained Hartree–Fock method , 1991 .

[22]  A. D. McLean,et al.  Accurate calculation of the attractive interaction of two ground state helium atoms , 1973 .

[23]  Trygve Helgaker,et al.  Molecular Electronic-Structure Theory: Helgaker/Molecular Electronic-Structure Theory , 2000 .

[24]  J. V. Lenthe,et al.  State of the Art in Counterpoise Theory , 1994 .

[25]  Jirí Cerný,et al.  Benchmark database of accurate (MP2 and CCSD(T) complete basis set limit) interaction energies of small model complexes, DNA base pairs, and amino acid pairs. , 2006, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[26]  Ł M Mentel,et al.  Can the Counterpoise Correction for Basis Set Superposition Effect Be Justified? , 2014, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[27]  Luca Frediani,et al.  The Dalton quantum chemistry program system , 2013, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular science.

[28]  J. Sordo,,et al.  Some comments on the counterpoise correction for the basis set superposition error at the correlated level , 1993 .

[29]  M. Head‐Gordon,et al.  A fifth-order perturbation comparison of electron correlation theories , 1989 .

[30]  L. Piela,et al.  Proper correction for the basis set superposition error in SCF calculations of intermolecular interactions , 1987 .

[31]  J. J. Dannenberg,et al.  Molecular orbital calculations of water clusters on counterpoise-corrected potential energy surfaces , 2004 .

[32]  István Mayer,et al.  Towards a “Chemical” Hamiltonian , 1983 .

[33]  István Mayer,et al.  An analytical investigation into the BSSE problem , 1991 .

[34]  A. J. Sadlej.  Exact perturbation treatment of the basis set superposition correction , 1991 .