What Works: Using Curriculum and Pedagogy to Increase Girls' Interest and Participation in Science

This article identifies instructional strategies, curricula, and organizational structures in the research literature that have been successful in encouraging girls' participation and achievement in science: science instruction in pre-kindergarten and kindergarten, relevant curricula that address girls' interests and provide opportunities for genuine inquiry and tinkering experiences, greater emphasis on physical science and the use of computers, integration of reading and writing in science, attention to how groups are formed in classrooms, activities that build self-efficacy, appropriate role models, messages that science is for everyone, and student-centered teaching. Special attention is given to the needs of children in preschool and kindergarten. In addition, research on the impact of single-sex classrooms and grouping is reviewed, along with the use of children's fictional literature to teach science. Implications derived from research literature include changes in what is taught, how it is taught, how teachers are prepared, and how these changes are paid for.

[1]  Andrew Cousins,et al.  Gender Inclusivity in Secondary Chemistry: A study of male and female participation in secondary school chemistry , 2007 .

[2]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[3]  Frank M. Pajares,et al.  Against the Odds: Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Women in Mathematical, Scientific, and Technological Careers , 2000 .

[4]  Panayota Mantzicopoulos,et al.  Motivation for learning science in kindergarten: Is there a gender gap and does integrated inquiry and literacy instruction make a difference , 2009 .

[5]  Frances P Lawrenz,et al.  Perceived Helpfulness and Amount of Use of Technology in Science and Mathematics Classes at Different Grade Levels. , 2006 .

[6]  Candace Hsiao-Ching She,et al.  Gifted elementary students’ interactions with female and male scientists in a biochemistry enrichment program , 1997 .

[7]  Christine Y. O'Sullivan,et al.  The Nation's Report Card: Writing, 2002. , 2003 .

[8]  Bob Campbell,et al.  Talking Science: The research evidence on the use of small group discussions in science teaching , 2010 .

[9]  Mary L. Trepanier-Street,et al.  The Influence of Children's Literature on Gender Role Perceptions: A Reexamination , 1999 .

[10]  L. Rennie,et al.  Teachers' implementation of gender-inclusive instructional strategies in single-sex and mixed-sex science classrooms , 2002 .

[11]  M. Volman,et al.  Gender Equity and Information Technology in Education: The Second Decade , 2001 .

[12]  Adam V. Maltese,et al.  Eyeballs in the Fridge: Sources of early interest in science , 2010 .

[13]  K. Tobin.  Gender Equity and the Enacted Science Curriculum , 1996 .

[14]  Sally Beisser.  An Examination of Gender Differences in Elementary Constructionist Classrooms Using Lego/Logo Instruction , 2005 .

[15]  Janice L. Streitmatter.  For Girls Only: Making a Case for Single-Sex Schooling , 1999 .

[16]  D. Baker.  Good Intentions: An Experiment in Middle School Single-Sex Science and Mathematics Classrooms with High Minority Enrollment. , 2002 .

[17]  H. Patrick,et al.  Learning science through inquiry in kindergarten , 2008 .

[18]  G. Leder,et al.  Mathematics classrooms, gender and affect , 1996 .

[19]  Heidi B. Carlone,et al.  The Cultural Production of Science in Reform-based Physics: Girls’ Access, Participation, and Resistance , 2004 .

[20]  Mary Ann Evans,et al.  The effect of a role model project upon the attitudes of ninth‐grade science students , 1995 .

[21]  Alexandre Gaudeul,et al.  The review of educational research. , .

[22]  L. Hoffmann,et al.  An intervention study to enhance girls' interest, self-concept, and achievement in physics classes , 2002 .

[23]  David T. Burkam,et al.  Gender differences in middle grade science achievement: Subject domain, ability level, and course emphasis , 1996 .

[24]  James B. Schreiber,et al.  Girls' academic achievement: varying associations of extracurricular activities , 2004 .

[25]  Kathy Cabe Trundle,et al.  Using Children’s Literature to Teach Standard-Based Science Concepts in Early Years , 2009 .

[26]  Jean Wollam.  The Advantage of Same-Sex Programs , 1990 .

[27]  Ellen L. Usher,et al.  Sources of Self-Efficacy in School: Critical Review of the Literature and Future Directions , 2008 .

[28]  Matthew M. Mehalik,et al.  Middle‐School Science Through Design‐Based Learning versus Scripted Inquiry: Better Overall Science Concept Learning and Equity Gap Reduction , 2008 .

[29]  Dale R. Baker,et al.  Letting girls speak out about science , 1995 .

[30]  Philip M. Sadler,et al.  Connecting High School Physics Experiences, Outcome Expectations, Physics Identity, and Physics Career Choice: A Gender Study. , 2010 .

[31]  J. Jastrow.  ELEMENTARY SCIENCE-TEACHING. , 1886, Science.

[32]  David T. Burkam,et al.  Gender and Science Learning Early in High School: Subject Matter and Laboratory Experiences , 1997 .

[33]  Brian Matthews.  Promoting emotional literacy, equity and interest in science lessons for 11–14 year olds; the ‘Improving Science and Emotional Development’ project , 2004 .

[34]  D. Treagust,et al.  Gender-inclusive technology materials for the primary school: A case study in curriculum development , 1991 .

[35]  L. Rennie,et al.  Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of single-sex and mixed-sex mathematics classes , 1997 .

[36]  Ann M. L. Cavallo,et al.  Students' Science Perceptions and Enrollment Decisions in Differing Learning Cycle Classrooms. , 2001 .

[37]  Larry D. Yore,et al.  The effects of explicit science reading instruction on selected grade 7 students' metacognition and comprehension of specific science text , 1999 .

[38]  Jane Stout,et al.  STEMing the tide: using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  Shari L. Britner.  Motivation in high school science students: A comparison of gender differences in life, physical, and earth science classes , 2008 .