The search experience variable in information behavior research

A conceptually relaxed utilization of the variable “search experience” makes it difficult for researchers to perform meaningful cross-study comparisons. The purpose of this study was to examine how search experience is defined and measured when used as a research variable. We implemented a qualitative analysis of 32 library and information science (LIS) research articles. We found that there was inconsistent terminology usage and measurements. Specifically, there were 21 unique labels to describe the search experience and 18 different measurements. The majority of the studies used a generic label “search experience” and relied on the reader to grasp specific context of the electronic information retrieval environment to which the variable applies from the description of the overall research design. In addition, there was a strong preference for measures that represented subjective self-reporting about the level of exposure to some information retrieval system. It is evident that there is a need for articles to contain detailed definitions of search experience variables for readers to truly understand the findings. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Charles T. Meadow,et al.  A study of user performance and attitudes with information retrieval interfaces , 1995 .

[2]  Mark Chignell,et al.  Assessment of the effects of user characteristics on mental models of information retrieval systems , 2001 .

[3]  Kyung-Sun Kim,et al.  Cognitive style and on-line database search experience as predictors of Web search performance , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Harm J. A. Biemans,et al.  Differences between novice and experienced users in searching information on the World Wide Web , 2000 .

[5]  Gary Marchionini Information Seeking in Full-Text End-User-Oriented Search Systems: The Roles of Domain and Search Expertise , 1993 .

[6]  Dietmar Wolfram,et al.  Hypertext vs Boolean-based Searching in a Bibliographic Database Environment: A Direct Comparison of Searcher Performance , 1998, Inf. Process. Manag..

[7]  Ingrid Hsieh-Yee,et al.  Effects of Search Experience and Subject Knowledge on the Search Tactics of Novice and Experienced Searchers. , 1993 .

[8]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  A profile of end‐user searching behavior by humanities scholars: The Getty Online Searching Project Report No. 2 , 1993 .

[9]  P. M. Turner,et al.  The effect of baud rate, performance anxiety, and experience on online bibliographic searches , 1990 .

[10]  Thomas L. Jacobson,et al.  Computer, system, and subject knowledge in novice searching of a full-text, multifile database , 1992 .

[11]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Why are Online Catalogs Hard to Use? Lessons Learned from Information=Retrieval Studies , 1986 .

[12]  Raya Fidel,et al.  Factors affecting online bibliographic retrieval: A conceptual framework for research , 1983, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[13]  Natalie Schoch King Search Characteristics and the Effects of Experience on End Users of PaperChase , 1991 .

[14]  Prudence W. Dalrymple,et al.  Users' Experience of Information Retrieval Systems: An Exploration of the Relationship between Search Experience and Affective Measures. , 1992 .

[15]  Dania Bilal Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine: II. cognitive and physical behaviors on research tasks , 2001 .

[16]  Christoph Hölscher,et al.  Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[17]  Weijing Yuan End-user searching behavior in information retrieval: a longitudinal study , 1997 .

[18]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  A review of web searching studies and a framework for future research , 2001 .

[19]  Stephen P. Harter Online Searching Styles: An Exploratory Study. , 1984 .

[20]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  All users of information retrieval systems are not created equal: An exploration into individual differences , 1989, Inf. Process. Manag..

[21]  Charles T. Meadow,et al.  A study of the use of variables in information retrieval user studies , 1999 .

[22]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Cognitive strategies in web searching. , 1999 .

[23]  Charles T. Meadow,et al.  Speculations on the Measurement and Use of User Characteristics in Information Retrieval Experimentation. , 1994 .

[24]  Liwen Qiu,et al.  Markov Models of Search State Patterns in a Hypertext Information Retrieval System , 1993, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[25]  Helen Howard,et al.  Measures that discriminate among online searchers with different training and experience , 1982 .

[26]  Wendy T. Lucas,et al.  Training for Web search: Will it get you in shape? , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[27]  Carol H. Fenichel,et al.  Online searching: Measures that discriminate among users with different types of experiences , 1981, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[28]  Madjid Ihadjadene,et al.  The effect of individual differences on searching the web , 2003, ASIST.

[29]  David Miller,et al.  The role of individual differences in Internet searching: an empirical study , 2001 .

[30]  David Jonassen,et al.  Teachers’ Perceptions about Usability Of a Case Library , 2005 .